StubHub FanProtect guarantee failed. Here’s how one buyer fought back.

Photo of author

By Christopher Elliott

In This Case – StubHub Concert Tickets

in this case

  • Jeff Balesh bought two Eric Clapton tickets through StubHub for $780 in Section 114. He paid over $100 in service fees for StubHub’s FanProtect Guarantee. The seller backed out.
  • StubHub canceled the purchase and offered replacement seats in Section 108 or 207. These were dramatically inferior seats. StubHub said the system gave what it could offer and nothing more.
  • Balesh wrote to customer service and copied executives. This was his 24th wedding anniversary gift for his wife. They had already booked travel and hotel in Philadelphia. Can they get a refund?

When Jeff Balesh buys tickets to see Eric Clapton in Philadelphia, he counts on StubHub’s FanProtect Guarantee to protect his purchase. It fails. Now, with travel booked and a 24th anniversary on the line, he needs StubHub to honor its promise.

Question

I bought two tickets to an Eric Clapton concert in Philadelphia through StubHub a few months ago. The seats were in Section 114, and I paid $780, including over $100 in service fees, because I wanted the protection of StubHub’s FanProtect Guarantee. That guarantee promises buyers the exact tickets they ordered — or comparable or better replacement seats.

But the seller backed out of the deal. StubHub canceled my purchase and offered replacement seats in Section 108 or 207 — dramatically inferior to what I paid for. 

I wrote to StubHub’s customer service team and even copied several executives, but I was told “the system” had given me what it could offer and nothing more.

This was supposed to be a special anniversary gift for my wife, and we’ve already booked travel and a hotel in Philadelphia. A refund is not acceptable. I just want StubHub to honor its promise and provide tickets in Section 114, 124, or floor sections. Can you help? — Jeff Balesh, Towson, Md.

Answer

StubHub’s FanProtect Guarantee is clear: If your seller cancels, the company promises replacement tickets that are the same or comparable to those you originally booked. But there’s a significant asterisk buried in that guarantee, and I’ll get to it in a moment.

Your paper trail shows you did everything right. You contacted customer service, asked for help on social media, and escalated your complaint to the executive level. (I publish the names, numbers and email addresses of the StubHub executive contacts on my consumer advocacy site, Elliott Advocacy.)

StubHub still wouldn’t budge. Instead, it told you that its system dictated the replacement tickets, even though you could see better seats available on its own site. That’s the kind of corporate doublespeak that makes consumers feel cheated and disrespected. Kind of like something right out of an Eric Clapton song, come to think of it. (Related: Ticketmaster sold me “great seats” that turned out to be obstructed. Where’s my refund?)

EMBARK Beyond is a luxury travel advisory dedicated to creating thoughtfully designed experiences that go beyond a destination. Focused first on client needs, we have built (and continue to build!) relationships with the world’s most sought-after lifestyle and fashion brands to open the world - beyond imagination - to our clients. Find out more at EMBARK Beyond.

You were also right to push back against a refund, which was your other option. But remember that asterisk I was talking about? Here it is: According to the guarantee, StubHub will “find you comparable or better tickets to the event, or offer you a refund of what you paid for your purchase or credit of the same amount for use on a future purchase.” In other words, under the guarantee, StubHub could offer you a refund and it would be in compliance. Top Comment – AJPeabody

🏆 Your top comment

“The System!” And there you have it. StubHub is just a computer program; human beings do not override system failures, nor are the programmers asked to fix the system. Tickets are sold via a monopoly that effectively denies any significant purchases directly from the venue, resales are done through secondary sellers with huge markups over face, then charge massive fees, and the real fans are SOL. Just pay and pay and pay and hope you get something similar to what you paid for. Welcome to the future.

– AJPeabody
Read more insightful reader feedback. See all comments.

Why StubHub’s FanProtect guarantee has a major catch

Quick sidebar: Our advocacy team has been receiving a growing number of StubHub complaints lately, many involving the FanProtect Guarantee. If StubHub is going to advertise that it protects ticket buyers, it needs to make good on that promise — or change the way it promotes its guarantee. There’s no two ways about it. (Related: StubHub charged me $3,300 for Coldplay tickets I never received — can I get my money back?)

Your case shows why persistence matters. When a company makes a bold promise like StubHub’s FanProtect, customers should expect it to follow through. If it isn’t, don’t accept excuses about what the “system” can or can’t do. Press for the resolution you’re owed.

I reached out to StubHub on your behalf. After some back-and-forth, the company finally honored its guarantee. It issued you tickets in the same section you originally booked, just as you asked. You and your wife will celebrate your 24th anniversary at an Eric Clapton concert after all. Your Voice Matters – StubHub Concert Tickets

Your voice matters

Jeff Balesh bought Eric Clapton tickets for $780 in Section 114 through StubHub. He paid over $100 in fees for the FanProtect Guarantee. The seller backed out. StubHub offered dramatically inferior replacement seats and said the system gave what it could offer and nothing more.

  • Should ticket resale platforms be legally required to honor comparable seat guarantees or face automatic full refunds plus travel costs?
  • Should platforms be prohibited from blaming automated systems when they fail to deliver on customer guarantees they advertise?
  • Should service fees be refunded when platforms cannot deliver the tickets or seat quality they promised in their guarantee?
66552
Should ticket resale platforms be allowed to charge service fees when they can't deliver the tickets they sold?
What You’re Saying – StubHub Concert Tickets

what you’re saying

Our community is discussing ticketing monopolies, service fees, and why the system fails real fans.

StubHub is just a computer program with no human oversight

AJPeabody says the system runs on autopilot with no human beings to override failures. Programmers aren’t asked to fix it. Tim points out StubHub is a ticket scalper with a website instead of a shady guy near the venue. The FanProtect guarantee favors the company by allowing simple refunds.

Service fees are junk fees

Gerri Hether refuses to buy concert tickets from third parties. If she can’t buy directly from the venue, she doesn’t go. Brooklyn only attends if she can buy at the box office in person or reserve by phone and pick up tickets the night of the show. She won’t pay advance ticket prices.

Sellers should transfer tickets before listing them

Joe X suggests all tickets should be instant download. Sellers should have to transfer tickets to StubHub or SeatGeek when they list them, preventing sellers from backing out after buyers have made plans. CasaAlux asks why people still use StubHub given the problems and would rather not go than use secondary markets.
Photo of author

Christopher Elliott

Christopher Elliott is the founder of Elliott Advocacy, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that empowers consumers to solve their problems and helps those who can't. He's the author of numerous books on consumer advocacy and writes three nationally syndicated columns. He also publishes the Elliott Report, a news site for consumers, and Elliott Confidential, a critically acclaimed newsletter about customer service. If you have a consumer problem you can't solve, contact him directly through his advocacy website. You can also follow him on X, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or sign up for his daily newsletter.

Related Posts