Bartosz Jusypenko rents a car through Turo in Canada and returns it without incident — or so he thinks. The host claims a new scratch appeared during the rental, but the car was dirty at pickup. Now Turo wants him to pay $1,200 to fix the damage. Is that right? 

Question

The car was covered in mud when I picked it up, making it impossible to inspect for existing damage. At drop-off, it was dark, snowy, and my phone was dying, so my photos were too dim to prove anything. 

The host admitted the damage could’ve happened after I left the car in an unsecured parking spot. He refused to meet in person to discuss the alleged damage. He rented the car out again immediately, and Turo backed his $1,200 claim despite mechanics saying the scratch was minor.  

Turo ignored my evidence and raised the charge by $400 for “hidden damage” found after other renters used the car. As a student living on less than $2,000 a month, this fee is devastating. Did I just become a victim of a Turo scam?  — Bartosz Jusypenko, Olszanica, Poland  

Answer

Turo, which is like Airbnb for cars, should have ensured the host followed its own policy requiring vehicles to be clean at pickup. A dirty car prevented you from documenting pre-existing damage, violating the company’s terms (Turo’s guidelines state hosts must “clean the vehicle before each trip”). 

Alberta’s Consumer Protection Act also requires businesses to act in good faith, which Turo ignored by rubber-stamping blurry photos and refusing to address your evidence.  

But you made a few mistakes, too. First, you shouldn’t have accepted a muddy car. If you had no choice, you should have spoken with your Turo host about the difficulty of documenting any pre-existing damage. (For me, knowing what I know about damage claims, I would have been highly reluctant to accept anything other than a written waiver from the host.)

You should have taken better photos at drop-off. But the host’s refusal to allow an inspection — and Turo’s failure to mandate one — tilted the process unfairly. 

Always keep a detailed paper trail, as you did, and escalate to executives if a company stonewalls you. I’ve published Turo’s contacts on my consumer advocacy site, Elliott.org.

Before I get to the resolution of this case, I wanted to note that I agree with Turo and the host on one issue. If a renter damages a car while they have it — even if it’s not their fault — they are responsible. In other words, if someone scratched your car and you didn’t notice, it doesn’t matter. You’re still on the hook.

But the evidence in this case was as muddy as the side of your Turo car. The photos were inconclusive. Turo didn’t follow its procedures, and neither did the car’s owner. The company needed to take another look at your case. 

I contacted Turo on your behalf. The company admitted the host’s photos were “unclear” and voided the claim. “We remind all hosts and guests of the importance of clear trip photos,” a representative told me.

Moral of the story? Never let a company pressure you into paying for damage that was not visible at the time of pickup — and always snap those pre-trip photos, even if it means borrowing a flashlight.