in this case
- A family uses United miles for a Lufthansa flight, but a schedule change creates an impossible connection for their daughter, who uses a wheelchair.
- A United agent trying to fix the problem makes another mistake, canceling a key flight and leaving the family with a much longer, more difficult itinerary.
- After the airline offers a meager voucher, the family wonders if they’ll ever get the flights they need.
Brian Landmann books award tickets on Lufthansa through United Airlines. But when United changes his itinerary, he’s left with an impossible connection. Can he get United to fix this?
Question
My family and I booked flights from Berlin to Seattle on Lufthansa using United Airlines miles. Our initial itinerary had us flying from Berlin to Munich to Seattle. Lufthansa canceled the Munich to Seattle flight, rebooking us on a flight from Berlin to Frankfurt to Seattle, with a stopover in Frankfurt of only 1 hour and 25 minutes.
My daughter requires a powered wheelchair and a ventilator. This connection time was not enough time to make our flight.
What’s the minimum connection time you’re comfortable with for an international flight? Should airlines be required to provide longer “legal” connection times for passengers who declare a disability?
Have you ever felt like you received worse service when traveling on an award ticket compared to a paid fare? Or have you been treated better because of your loyalty status?
Share your stories of airline schedule changes and booking errors in the comments below.
I contacted United, and they rebooked us on a flight from Berlin to Frankfurt, with an overnight stay in Frankfurt to ensure we had enough time for our connecting flight from Frankfurt to Seattle.
But then United Airlines changed the flight, this time booking us with connecting flights from Frankfurt to Washington Dulles to Seattle. This is a much longer flight duration — at least 5 hours longer than the direct flight — and adds an extra connection, which will be very difficult for my daughter.
When I contacted United to complain, an agent who had rebooked our flights had mistakenly canceled the Lufthansa direct flight, and because there were no more award seats available, United rebooked us on the connecting flights. When I asked United to fix the problem, the airline only offered us a $75 voucher per person, which is unacceptable.
We need United to either book us on the direct Lufthansa flight or provide us with adequate compensation for this mistake. — Brian Landmann, Woodinville, Wash.
Answer
When an airline makes a mistake, the airline must fix it, not you. And this was quite a mistake, and an insensitive one at that. I can’t even make an international connection in Frankfurt in less than 1 ½ hours — at least I couldn’t the last time I tried. How do they expect someone in a wheelchair to make it?
Your case raises several questions. For example, are you considered a second-class citizen if you are redeeming miles for your flight? You probably felt that way. But actually, the opposite should be true. Your airline should be treating you better because of your loyalty. Someone should have ensured that you were booked on flights with reasonable connection times — after all, you’re one of United’s best customers.
Read more insightful reader feedback. See all comments.
Another question: Should United have gone the extra mile for a passenger with a disability? Clearly, yes. United has a dedicated department for special-needs passengers that should have been able to help. I didn’t see any correspondence with that department in your paper trail, but that might have been a shortcut to a solution.
You might have also tried reaching out to one of the United Airlines executives. I publish their names, numbers and email addresses on my consumer advocacy site, Elliott.org. Ultimately, when I look at your itinerary, I might have gone with an Icelandair flight with one stop in Reykjavik that would have gotten you to Seattle in about 12 hours. You could have saved your points for another flight.
I contacted United Airlines on your behalf. After reviewing your case, the airline agreed to rebook you on a flight from Berlin to Newark with a two-night layover in Newark, followed by a direct flight from Newark to Seattle. This new itinerary allows enough time for your daughter to comfortably transfer between flights. The airline also issued you a $350 voucher per person as compensation for the inconvenience caused by the changes to your itinerary.
While the new itinerary may not be perfect, it allows your family to travel comfortably and safely.
Grounded rights
How systemic service failures affect airline passengers with disabilities
The promise of access vs. the reality of travel
The Air Carrier Access Act (ACAA) guarantees equal access, yet disability-related complaints filed with the DOT have soared. This investigation reveals these are not isolated incidents, but systemic breakdowns.
1. The digital disconnect
The language of need
Airlines use Special Service Request (SSR) codes (like WCHC for aisle chair need) to communicate a passenger’s disability requirements. This data is critical for safe travel.
The automated breakdown
During flight disruptions, automated rebooking systems designed for speed often fail to transfer SSR codes, effectively erasing the passenger’s needs and creating “impossible itineraries.”
2. The anatomy of an agent error
Pressure cooker metrics
Agents are judged on speed (Average Handle Time). Complex disability cases hurt their metrics, creating pressure to find a quick fix—like a voucher—instead of a real solution.
The burden shift
Offering a voucher or refund is the path of least resistance. It resolves the call quickly for the agent but shifts the entire burden of rebooking onto the passenger, violating their right to resolution.
3. The regulatory void
Law vs. contract
The ACAA guarantees access. Airline Contracts of Carriage are written to limit liability. This contradiction creates a legal gray area that airlines exploit to deny service.
A trickle of enforcement
Historically, the DOT has acted only on “patterns” of complaints. With thousands of complaints filed annually but very few fines, it has been cheaper for airlines to fail than to fix their systems.
Recommendations for systemic reform
- For the DOT: Shift from reactive enforcement to proactive audits of airline IT systems and agent training. Mandate that technology must preserve disability data during rebookings.
- For airlines: Reform agent performance metrics to prioritize quality over speed for disability-related calls. Empower agents with the authority to book on other airlines to solve problems.
- For passengers: Meticulously document all interactions. When a problem occurs, immediately ask for a Complaint Resolution Official (CRO) and file a formal complaint with the DOT, not just the airline.
Related reads
