My ticket change request is lost in translation. Can I get my $4,352 back from Austrian Airlines?

Photo of author

By Christopher Elliott

in this case

  • Randal Marchessault attempts to rebook his business-class trip to Egypt after a tour cancellation, but an Austrian Airlines agent completely misunderstands his request.
  • Instead of rebooking him like his wife, the airline cancels his ticket entirely, refunding only $108 of the $4,352 fare and calling the mistake “irreversible.”
  • Facing a total loss due to a simple communication error, he fights to prove that “tour canceled” does not mean “cancel my ticket.”

Randal Marchessault watches in disbelief as Austrian Airlines refunds him just $108 after a botched ticket change request. But the airline rebooks his wife’s identical ticket without any problem. Now he’s fighting to get a $4,352 refund.

Question

My wife and I booked business-class tickets to Cairo through Austrian Airlines and Lufthansa for a tour of Egypt. The tour operator canceled the trip because of the conflict in the Middle East. When I called Austrian to rebook, the agent misunderstood “tour canceled” as “cancel booking.” 

The airline refunded only $108 instead of rebooking my $4,352 ticket. But the airline handled my wife’s identical ticket perfectly. Austrian insists the refund is “irreversible.” Can you help?  

Randal Marchessault, Maple Grove, Minn.  

Answer

That sounds like a real “lost in translation” moment — and it’s one reason you should always handle ticket changes online, where there’s less chance that someone will misunderstand you. But still, there’s no such thing as “irreversible” — even in the airline industry.

Here’s what should have happened: When you called Austrian Airlines to explain that your tour was canceled because of a regional conflict, the agent should have confirmed your intent. Did you want to cancel for a refund or rebook for future travel? Then the agent should have rebooked you, as requested. Airlines are supposed to have consistent policies, especially for flexible, changeable tickets like the one you had.

I’m shocked that the agent rebooked one of your tickets properly, but not the other. Based on that alone, your request should have prompted a review of your call to see what went wrong. The email correspondence you provided — and my subsequent communication with Austrian Airlines — suggests there was no high-level review of your case.

If Austrian Airlines canceled your flight against your wishes, it owes you a full refund under Department of Transportation rules. 

Global Rescue is the world’s leading provider of medical, security, evacuation and travel risk management services. Founded in 2004, Global Rescue has exclusive relationships with the Johns Hopkins Emergency Medicine Division of Special Operations and Elite Medical Group. Global Rescue provides best-in-class services that identify, monitor and respond to client medical and security crises. Learn more about Global Rescue.
🏆 Your top comment

I voted “yes” in the survey that the company is responsible financially if their representative misunderstood the customer. However, before that, a human should review the call to ensure the customer was clear on what they wanted.

I suspect the representatives manning the phones for Austrian Airlines understand many languages besides their own, so I agree that there was no “lost in translation” issues but more of an incorrect action on the rep’s side.

– Tim
Read more insightful reader feedback. See all comments.

You might have been able to prevent this by asking for an immediate written confirmation of your ticket change. A quick review and escalation to one of Austrian Airlines’ executives might have turned this around for you.  

I contacted Austrian Airlines on your behalf, and I have to confess, I quickly concluded that this was more than just a “lost in translation” issue. The airline continued to ask for documentation you had already sent them. No, this appeared to be an airline that had made a mistake and then doubled down on it. The representatives understood what you were saying.

After you made several attempts to send Austrian the information about the improperly canceled flight, it finally credited you the full $4,352.

There’s a lesson for all of us here. The next time you have to make a ticket change, stay off the phone if you can. Because if a mistake happens, chances are, you will pay for it.

Your voice matters

A single phone call turned a routine rebooking into a $4,000 mistake. When an agent mishears you, who should pay the price: the airline or the customer?

  • Should airlines be required to record and review calls when a customer disputes a transaction, or is that too much to ask?
  • Have you ever had a “lost in translation” moment with a customer service agent that cost you money?
  • Is it safer to handle all ticket changes online to create a paper trail, even if the website is frustrating?
24016
Should airlines be held financially responsible if a call center agent misunderstands a passenger's request?

What you’re saying

Readers were baffled by the inconsistency of the airline’s actions. How could one ticket be rebooked perfectly while the other was canceled? Most agreed that “lost in translation” is no excuse for a $4,000 error.

  • The agent is the airline

    Tim and Gerri Hether argued that since the agent represents the company, the airline bears full financial liability for their errors. JenniferFinger added that delaying the fix was likely a deliberate attempt to hold onto the funds.

  • The mystery of the split outcome

    myterp and OnePersonOrAnother tried to solve the puzzle: Did the couple call separately? Dealing with different agents seems like the only logical explanation for such drastically different outcomes for identical tickets.

  • ‘Irreversible’ is a lie

    M.C. Storm and Jennifer called out the airline’s defense. They noted that the moment the wife’s ticket was handled correctly, it should have triggered an automatic review. Labeling a mistake “irreversible” is just a stall tactic.

Photo of author

Christopher Elliott

Christopher Elliott is the founder of Elliott Advocacy, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that empowers consumers to solve their problems and helps those who can't. He's the author of numerous books on consumer advocacy and writes three nationally syndicated columns. He also publishes the Elliott Report, a news site for consumers, and Elliott Confidential, a critically acclaimed newsletter about customer service. If you have a consumer problem you can't solve, contact him directly through his advocacy website. You can also follow him on X, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or sign up for his daily newsletter.

Related Posts