Help! Avis charged me $7,671 for a one-day car rental

Photo of author

By Christopher Elliott

In this case: Avis $7,671 loss of use charge

in this case

  • An Avis customer is rear-ended (not his fault) but gets a surprise $7,671 charge for 29 days of “loss of use.”
  • Avis issues a receipt for a 29-day rental, not “loss of use,” causing the customer’s insurance to deny the claim.
  • See how advocacy helped cut through the internal “confusion” and get a massive billing error from Avis and Sedgwick reversed.

Nicholas Chandler was rear-ended while driving an Avis rental car. Even though the other driver was at fault, Avis charged him for the entire time the car was out of commission. Can he get a refund?

Question 

I rented a car from Avis for one day and was unfortunately rear-ended by another car. It was the other driver’s fault. Avis charged my credit card for 29 days of rental for loss of use. My insurance covers loss of use, but my insurance company won’t pay because the Avis receipt just shows a 29-day rental and doesn’t mention loss of use. 

Avis told me on the phone that the charge is for loss of use, but they won’t give me a new receipt.

Sedgwick, Avis’s third-party claims service, is pursuing loss of use from the other driver’s insurance company. Sedgwick told me that they think Avis made a billing error because I was not at fault for the accident. I don’t understand why Avis charged my credit card for 29 days. When I call to ask, they just say loss of use. Can you help me get a refund? — Nicholas Chandler, Windham, Maine Your voice matters: Unfair loss of use charges?

Your voice matters

Nicholas Chandler was charged $7,671 for “loss of use” after an accident that wasn’t his fault. Avis’s misleading receipt nearly cost him thousands. We want to hear your thoughts.

  • Should car rental companies be allowed to charge “loss of use” fees, especially when the customer isn’t at fault?
  • Have you ever been caught in a billing dispute where a company’s bad paperwork caused your insurance to deny a claim?
  • What’s your best advice for dealing with a rental car company’s third-party claims administrator like Sedgwick?

Answer

Unfortunately, you’re on the hook for the vehicle’s loss of use. When you rent a car, you accept responsibility for the vehicle no matter who is responsible for the accident, and since your name was on the contract, Avis sent you a bill.

But the company made some errors when it charged you.

It looks like there was a series of miscommunications in your case. For some reason, Sedgwick only charged the other driver $1,222, presumably for repairs, leaving you responsible for the difference. And, according to your records, Avis would not send you a bill for the loss of use. Instead, it just appears as if you rented a car at the most expensive daily rate, which no one would do. (Related: Can I fix this Avis “fantasy” rental charge?)

Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection covers consumers and their travel dreams, backed by Berkshire Hathaway Specialty Insurance Company’s financial strength and security. Choose travel insurance designed specifically to your trip and travelers, plus the fastest claims payments in the travel insurance industry. Get more information at Berkshire Hathaway Travel Protection.
Top comment: When Hertz did the right thing
🏆 YOUR TOP COMMENT

Quite a few years ago, at least 15 I think, my rental car was parked and an impaired driver lost control and hit 3 parked cars on the street including my rental. The car was undriveable. I called Hertz and they sent a tow truck to get the car.

I rode with the tow truck driver to Harrisburg airport where I had rented and they had a replacement car ready for me. Fortunately the impaired driver had insurance which the police officer gave me. I passed that on to Hertz and never heard anymore about it. I guess this was at a time when Hertz did the right thing.

— Carol P
Read more insightful reader feedback. See all comments.

I would be remiss if I didn’t mention that loss of use is highly controversial. The car rental company is charging you the maximum daily rate for what it would have earned if it had been able to rent the car while it was in the shop. But that assumes it could have rented the car the entire time. I believe loss of use is not a fair charge, even if your contract permits it. Many consumers, insurance companies and state regulators agree with me. We can discuss loss of use another day, though. (Related: Billed twice by Avis car rental? There’s a fix for that, travelers.)

You were a model customer. You had insurance that covered you and you responded quickly to Avis and Sedgwick when they asked for your insurance information. You drove the car carefully. You tried to work within the system to clear up the miscommunication. (Here’s our best guide to renting a car.)

I think you should have appealed this to a manager. I list the names, numbers and emails of the Avis customer service managers and Sedgwick customer service managers on my consumer advocacy site, Elliott.org. 

This was a confusing case. But after several conversations with Avis, it appears that there were “some issues” with the car rental location and the tow truck, which created some confusion in its internal system.

“We’re adjusting the contract back to a one-day rental and removing all the additional days that the customer didn’t have the vehicle,” a representative told me.

A short while later, you reported back.  

“Avis charged me one day for the rental as you mentioned and refunded me the rest,” you said. “The credit was posted back to my card this morning. This is incredible, and I can’t thank you enough for all of your help.” Infographic: How to fight unfair car rental charges

How to fight unfair car rental charges

Your guide to fighting ‘loss of use’ and billing errors

Understand the “loss of use” trap

You are responsible (at first): Your rental contract makes you liable for the car’s condition, even if an accident is not your fault. The rental company will charge you first.
What “loss of use” means: Companies charge the full daily rate for every day the car is in the shop, claiming they lost potential income. This is a highly controversial fee.

Demand the right paperwork

Get an itemized receipt: A vague bill (like a “29-day rental”) will likely be rejected by your insurance. The receipt must specifically state “loss of use” and list repair charges.
Document everything: Keep all emails, bills, and insurance communications. Get names and reference numbers for any phone calls, then follow up with a summary email.

Escalate and resolve the issue

Be proactive with insurance: Do not just send the bill. Call your insurer, explain the charge, and ask exactly what paperwork they need. Then, go back to the rental company to get it.
Go up the chain: When frontline staff or third-party administrators give you the runaround, find and email the company executives.
Executive Contacts: Avis Budget Group

Executive Contacts

Stuck in a loop with Avis over a billing error or loss of use? Take your complaint straight to the top. Here are the executives who can help you resolve your issue.

Primary Contact

Joe Ferraro

President and CEO, Americas

joe.ferraro@avisbudget.com

Secondary Contact

Gerard Insall

EVP and Chief Information Officer

gerard.insall@avisbudget.com

Chief Executive

Izzy Martins

EVP and Chief Financial Officer

izzy.martins@avisbudget.com

26276
Should car rental companies be allowed to charge you for loss of use?
What you’re saying: ‘Loss of use’ feels predatory

What you’re saying

The $7,671 bill for a one-day rental is absurd, even if the driver wasn’t at fault. Readers are furious, calling “loss of use” charges predatory and arguing that the burden of proof always falls on the customer, not the company.

  • “Loss of Use” is predatory

    Readers like Ben argue that charging for loss of use “should be illegal” if you’re not at fault. Darla V suspects Avis was trying to “get paid twice,” and JenniferFinger finds the whole concept “scary” and just another way to “squeeze the customer.”

  • The burden of proof is on you

    Tina notes the clear moral: “document everything.” She argues that when the system fails, “the burden magically shifts to the renter.” Jason Hanna mentions that while his mistake was fixed, Avis *did* try to charge him twice for a windshield.

  • Company reputations matter

    Experiences vary wildly. Top commenter Carol P recalls a time when Hertz “did the right thing” after an accident. But Chris Johnson avoids Avis entirely, calling them “so badly run,” yet noting he “never” has issues with Budget, their sister company.

Read more: Avis stories
Photo of author

Christopher Elliott

Christopher Elliott is the founder of Elliott Advocacy, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that empowers consumers to solve their problems and helps those who can't. He's the author of numerous books on consumer advocacy and writes three nationally syndicated columns. He also publishes the Elliott Report, a news site for consumers, and Elliott Confidential, a critically acclaimed newsletter about customer service. If you have a consumer problem you can't solve, contact him directly through his advocacy website. You can also follow him on X, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or sign up for his daily newsletter.

Related Posts