Funny cell phone math on my trip to St. Maarten

Karen Daukantas-Jones takes her Verizon phones to St. Maarten. But it doesn’t travel well, and now they’ve charged her an extra $81. Find out what happens next.

Question: We took a very nice 14-day trip to St. Maarten recently. We had investigated various options for phone usage during the trip including renting a phone on the island, renting a sim card or using the Verizon Wireless Global Plan.

We were informed by a Verizon representative that the cost for using our Verizon service during our trip would be $40 per line for 100 minutes and 100 text messages (send).

Elliott Advocacy is underwritten by Virtuoso. The leading global network for luxury and experiential travel. This invitation-only organization comprises over 1,000 travel agency locations with 17,500 advisors in over 45 countries, and holds preferred relationships with 1,700 of the world’s finest travel companies. Virtuoso advisors collaborate with their clients to create personalized itineraries featuring exclusive perks, while also providing advice, access, advocacy, and accountability. For more information, visit

We were instructed to turn off the data feature on our phones or it would be billed as an additional usage charge. We were also told to call right before we left on the trip to minimize our costs. We called just before we left and activated our Global Plan.

When we returned, we received a $186 bill for the month, including the first three days of our trip. The Global feature for both phones showed the entire billing and the fee of $40 for each phone.

I called to make sure the Global Plan had been canceled. I learned that the service hadn’t been canceled but supposedly they canceled during our conversation. I was first told that we would be charged an additional $40 for each phone on the next billing cycle.

It did not make sense that we would be charged $160 for 14 days of service. A supervisor finally agreed and prorated the charges resulting in a credit of $75, including the related fees, and stated that the adjusted bill payment should be $113, which was promptly paid.

We received our latest bill and were amazed that the total bill was now $251. This bill reflects the $75 credit, $40 global charges for two billing cycles and $72 in roaming charges. So it appears that the supervisor didn’t follow through on her promise.

I called and was offered an adjustment of $14. By my calculations, it should be more like $81.– Karen Daukantas-Jones, Baltimore

Answer: Ah, roaming fees! Even though cellular companies swear they hate them, I think they secretly love them. I had an almost identical experience with AT&T on a recent trip to Italy. First, the promises. Then, the bill. And another bill.

I can’t take credit for getting AT&T to back down. That goes to Kari, my better half, who stayed on the line until every penny was accounted for, like the good MBA she is. (Thanks, Kari.)

Like almost any other company, cellular carriers will always do the math in their favor. You were right to be careful, and calling Verizon was a prudent move. But you know what they say – talk is cheap. You needed to have all this in writing, and unfortunately, you didn’t.

A better way to avoid this is to get a SIM card for your vacation. Don’t involve your carrier, because there’s a good chance they’ll add a “tip” to their bill for doing you the favor of allowing you to connect while you’re away.

This case got resolved the right way – without me having to get involved. You reached out to the executive contacts on my site.

“In less than 18 hours, I was contacted by a Verizon executive team member, who processed credits exceeding my expectation,” you told me. I love a happy ending.

Christopher Elliott’s latest book is “How To Be The World’s Smartest Traveler” (National Geographic). You can get real-time answers to any consumer question on his new forum,, or by emailing him at [email protected]

This article was first published June 29, 2015.

4 thoughts on “Funny cell phone math on my trip to St. Maarten

  1. I wish I saw this when published because I had the same exact thing happen to me in Turks and Caicos. AT&T charged me $800 extra though. Meanwhile, I was connected to hotel wireless the entire time, non roaming and have unlimited data and everything else. I still don’t understand it. Feel free to intervene in my case too. In full disclosure, I was able to negotiate them down to $400 (above my regular bill). The vacation was 2 nights and 3 days.

    1. I would like to know how AT&T Explained its charges in depth to you, considering you were only using the hotel’s wireless (I assume you meant Wi-Fi)? Did you have everything else turned off on your cell phone so that it was not roaming with all the things you have turn, on your phone? If not, those things can add up in a hurry. And, are sure that you actually hooked to and used the hotel’s Wi-Fi the whole time you we there? Could you have thought were hooked to it and yet actually were still connected to the cell provider for that area which in turn billed it to AT&T and to your account?

      1. All of those things are possible and I have no real way to refute them, like if my phone inadvertently connected to a local carrier for a few minutes when wifi was spotty here or there. Oddly, the billing details indicated that the only time data downloaded while I was away was for a very short time in the airport on my way home, as there was no wifi there. The exact moment was while I was on the security line and I answered a phone call from– guess who– AT&T re: data overuse. I told them I had no limit and would use as much as I pleased and hung up the phone. About 30 minutes later I turned it off and boarded. After a series of annoying negotiations, they offered @400 and I accepted just to be done with it.

  2. Ah, the joys of adhesion contracts! And yet another reason to record every word spoken by those tricky CSR’s who are trained to deceive, um I mean (mis?) inform. I hate to even suggest that ‘Gubbimint’ intervention could improve the most perfect of free markets, where we have a near infinite number of producers and consumers who can’t influence the price of products & services, but then again, that ship never landed in the USA, let alone sailed. When the gubbimint auctions off spectrum licenses to cell phone providers, they are giving that company the exclusive right to sell communication services over that spectrum. Most ‘free marketers’ are delusional, believing that no responsibility goes with the exclusive license to a ‘public good’. If indeed, the company breaks the public trust egregiously, they could, in theory have their public good seized by the government. In practice, it hardly ever happens, thanks to lobbyists and others who trade money for favors by our, or is it their elected representatives?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: