Do I really have to pay for this chip on my hood?

1-chip on hood (bonnet)Do you see the chip on Peter Wade’s rental car? Neither do I. But that isn’t stopping Thrifty Car Rental from charging him $165 for damage to the Ford Focus he rented in Glasgow, Scotland.

“The damages were unreasonable,” he told me. “Even comical.”

Elliott Advocacy is underwritten by Sodexo North America. Sodexo North America Sodexo North America is part of a global, Fortune 500 company with a presence in 80 countries. Sodexo is a leading provider of integrated food, facilities management and other services that enhance organizational performance, contribute to local communities and improve quality of life for millions of customers in corporate, education, healthcare, senior living, sports and leisure, government and other environments daily. Learn more at


I’ll let him explain.

Wade took every precaution he could. Or at least, he thought he had.

“When we were taking the pictures at the start of the rental, the Thrifty employee checking us out asked, ‘Why are you doing that? They won’t show anything’,” he remembers.

When he returned the vehicle at the end of the week, the same employee greeted him.

He claimed two items of damage: a minute rock chip of less than one square millimeter on the hood and a ¼ inch scratch on the passenger side front hubcap.

I was flabbergasted. These are items no reasonable car rental company would normally assess.

Wade’s credit card was charged $165 on the spot. Thrifty didn’t bother to show him a repair bill.

“I do not feel anyone should be obligated to pay this bill,” he told me. “I know I’m responsible for the vehicle when it is in my possession. However, there has to be a limit of what is reasonable to charge to a customer.”

Wade appealed the charge, but Thrifty repeated its claim that he was responsible, no matter how small he thought the damage was, and that it really didn’t have to show him anything else.

This looked suspicious to me. Shouldn’t the car rental company have sent him a bill after it knew how much the “damage” to its hood and tire would cost? And a car rental company actively discouraging customers from photographing its vehicles makes me even more suspicious.

Here’s how Thrifty responded to my request for a review.

Please again accept our sincere apologies for your continued dissatisfaction with the handling of your rental and damage charges.

Please again understand that our locations work to maintain their respective fleet based on the restrictions of the provider agreements including condition on return.

The specific response from our location to your original case is below, and explains the process utilized for smaller damage issues. Any other damage that may have been present at the beginning of your rental was, likewise, handled with this process.

Although you convey the areas of damage assessed to you as small, they are nonetheless valid as assessed.

I was impressed with how quickly they responded to Wade. It’s unlikely Thrifty contacted the Glasgow location to ask for its side of the story.

Unfortunately, this one is a “case dismissed” file. But there are a few important takeaways for all of us. First, if a car rental employee tells you there’s no point in taking a picture of the car, don’t walk away — run. It could be a sign that it really doesn’t matter what your pictures show, and that the company is running a ding-and-dent scam.

And second, never pay a repair bill without an invoice. Thrifty should have shown Wade an itemized bill before charging him for the repairs. If it didn’t, he should have disputed the charge with his credit card.

Should car rental companies charge a customer for damage on the spot, even without a repair bill?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

%d bloggers like this: