So you think that after criticizing the tarmac troopers recently, I’ll lay off my monthly series on the tarmac delay hall of shame?
I’m sorry to disappoint you.
The latest losers were released this morning by our friends over at the Department of Transportation. They’re for the month of September.
Only two flights had ground delays that exceeded four hours.
Delta Air Lines flight 1015 from Philadelphia to Atlanta, 9/21/09 – delayed on tarmac 275 minutes
American Airlines flight 1672 from Dallas/Fort Worth to Tulsa, Ok, 9/21/09 – delayed on tarmac 267 minutes
That is just way too long. You don’t need me to tell you that.
If you make it three hours, you see the players don’t change at all. It’s still Delta and American. (Here’s what you need to do if your flight gets delayed or canceled.)
I haven’t asked DOT about the reasons for the delays — were they mechanical or weather-related? — Oumbut my sense is that since they occurred on the same day, they may have been weather-related.
(FlightAware.com suggests both the American and Delta were delayed because of the weather.)
Would a ‘Passenger Bill of Rights’ have made a difference in tarmac delay situations?
Maybe Delta and American would be looking at some fines, but the passengers would have been just as stranded for more than four hours. And I’m not sure they would have received any kind of compensation, under the proposed law.
Have a question about this story? Tell us what happened — we read every comment.
Join the conversation
