Spirit Airlines, as you might have heard, is trying to raise $300 million in a public stock offering.
Here’s the Form S-1 it filed last Friday with the Securities and Exchange Commission. It’s worth a read. Companies are required to disclose any risks to potential investors. And it’s interesting to see how Spirit characterizes its own reputation when it comes to customer service.
Negative publicity regarding our customer service could have a material adverse effect on our business.
In the past we have experienced a relatively high number of customer complaints related to, among other things, our customer service, reservations and ticketing systems and baggage handling.
We generally experience a higher volume of complaints when we make changes to our unbundling policies, such as charging for baggage.
In addition, we entered into a consent order with the DOT requiring us to pay a civil penalty of $375,000. Our reputation and business could be materially adversely affected if we fail to meet customers’ expectations with respect to customer service or if we are perceived by our customers to provide poor customer service. (Related: Spirit’s Baldanza: “We don’t force customers to pay for services they don’t want or need”.)
Our business and reputation could have been harmed by the business shut down during the June 2010 pilot strike and any perceived failure to meet customer expectations during the strike and related negative publicity from the strike.
OK, then. I wonder how other airlines might describe their own risks, when it comes to customer service. A reader’s friend passed away. The reader expected the airfare refund to be fast and problem-free, but it wasn’t.
We normally write about more consumer-related complaints, like the Spirit Airline seat that was too small. But today’s topic is a bit more serious in nature. I wonder how passengers would describe it? (A reader’s honeymoon plans didn’t account for a British Airways strike.)