Donald Trump is making American consumers great again. Here’s how

By | May 1st, 2017

Donald Trump is good for consumers.

And not necessarily in the way you’d think. The new president is busy deregulating vast swaths of American industry with reckless abandon. But he has also — undoubtedly without meaning to — created a class of consumer that will be more enlightened and harder than ever to rip off. If you’re reading this, you may be among them.

This is the first of two articles that will explore the effects of the Trump presidency on American consumer behavior. This week I’m looking at the benefits, and next week, in the interests of fairness, I’ll examine the other side.

Lower prices?

In some cases, lowering regulation is thought to reduce the cost of products. A 2016 George Mason University study suggested that federal regulation raised the price of goods and services, affecting the poor disproportionately. It would follow, then, that deregulating everything from airlines to financial services would benefit consumers, particularly working-class Americans.

So the current administration’s oft-repeated promise of eliminating “burdensome” federal regulations might lead to lower prices for consumers. (And I know some of you, dear readers, are silently screaming that it could also lead to higher profits, if not also more dangerous products. Noted, but let’s deal with those in next week’s column.)

Removing regulations could also make some products more accessible to consumers. Take credit cards, for example. The 2009 CARD Act, which tightened regulation on credit cards and other financial products, reduced access to credit cards for younger consumers, according to a study by the Wisconsin School of Business. Specifically, it found those under the age of 21 were 15 percent less likely to have a credit card after passage of the legislation.

Related story:   Can this trip be saved? A lost sweater -- and now, radio silence

“We know the CARD Act reduced the use of credit cards by young people,” says Andra Ghent, an associate professor at the Wisconsin School of Business. “But the public policy benefits of that change are less clear.”

A glimpse into the mind of consumers

Cheaper, but possibly more dangerous, products. Kids with credit cards. OK, that might not be yuge for consumers. But consider what’s happening in the minds of consumers, now that Trump is in office.

If you spend all day talking to consumers, as I do, you’ve probably noticed a significant change. It started in November, when unabashedly anti-regulation candidate Trump was elected to office. Fearing the new administration would systematically dismantle vital federal protections, consumers began to realize that if they wanted help, they would have to help themselves.

But what is happening in the mind of customers? And how is the Trump administration making American consumers great again?

Consumers trust the government less — a lot less

Now that the administration appears to be on the side of American businesses, consumers are becoming increasingly aware of the fact that they have no ally in Washington. That’s turning even the most big-government Democrats into borderline Libertarians, at least when it comes to their skepticism of the government. And that’s not necessarily a bad thing. A healthy dose of disbelief serves all consumers well, regardless of political affiliation.

Consumers don’t take product claims at face value

In an era of “alternative” facts, customers are far less likely to believe anything, including the heavily advertised product claims a company makes. It’s increasingly clear that a skilled politician — or showman — can weasel out of any claims made (like wiretapping). That’s particularly useful when it comes to contracts. Should a consumer simply trust a company to do the right thing? Or even, to honor its word? Increasingly, the answer to those questions is “no.”

Related story:   Priceline promised to bend the rules, but now it's backtracking

Consumers know they have to work harder for a positive resolution

Since November, I’ve noticed a significant uptick in the number of consumers who simply refuse to take “no” for an answer. They’re aware that they can’t count on a federal or state agency to compel a company to do what’s right. Instead, they are determined to see their case all the way to the Supreme Court, if necessary. As a consumer advocate, I’ve been waiting for years for something to light a fire under aggrieved consumers. I’ve said it before, and I’ll say it again: You are your own best advocate.

Donald Trump and his surrogates may think that bulldozing away regulations will usher in a golden era for corporate profits. But it appears to be having the exact opposite effect. Consumers are more skeptical and empowered than they have been in perhaps a generation, thanks to the administration’s pro-business policies.

And in the end, that can only benefit you.

  • Alan Gore

    Deregulation is fine so long as it applies equally to both sides of the market. If businesses want fewer regulatory restraints, then let them give up the governmental restrictions on competition that they now enjoy. If Americans were allowed to buy generic medications on the world market as easily as we now buy computer chips, there would be no more artificial monopolies caused by exclusive marketing arrangements. If our airlines had to compete with Etihad and Singapore, the would all run like Southwest.

  • Hanope

    That’s one way to make orange juice out of the orange we have in the white house. But, of course, only the most savy consumers will fight for the rights, most of the rest will just bemoan the increased corporate power. And even those consumers who do fight, how many are getting satisfaction? Hopefully enough to get the corporations to make some changes. Of course, getting the word out to consumers via facebook and twitter helps too.

  • Alan Gore

    Social media has already gone a long way to equalize consumer rights in venues of corporate control. Just remember the Golden Rule of social media: tweet others as you would have them tweet you.

  • michael anthony

    Etihad might not be the best example anymore. In the June issue of Airliners, they Take a critical look at the carrier. And their bigger is better method is hurting them and they might be in some $$$ trouble soon, if things don’t change.

    Competition is great. Foreign competition on your own turf means loss of American carriers and jobs. Canada made some excellent points when they stopped Emirates from expanding thru out their country. We’d be wise to pay heed.

  • Barry

    There is nothing wrong with profits. it’s a basic fact that you need to make money in order to pay employees so that they can live. Also getting rid of regulations is a good thing if it means reducing stupid rules that don’t help anyone, which I believe is what President Trump is trying to do.

  • Wuerzburg

    I would think that there would be more of a job shift, especially with check in agents, ground staff, and gate agents. Why is it that almost every other business in the USA has to compete with foreign companies but airlines are protected. I think one of the best ways to make the USA owned airlines behave rationally and take care of customers would be to let foreign carriers transport passengers within the USA by eliminating Cabotage Laws.

We want your feedback. Your opinion is important to us. Here's how you can share your thoughts:
  • Send us a letter to the editor. We'll publish your most thoughtful missives in our daily newsletter or in an upcoming post.
  • Leave a message on one of our social networks. We have an active Facebook page, a LinkedIn presence and a Twitter account. Every story on this site is posted on those channels. The conversation ranges from completely unmoderated (Twitter) to moderated (Facebook and LinkedIn).
  • Post a question to our help forums or ask our advocates for a hand through our assistance intake form. Please note that our help forum is not a place for debate. It's there primarily to assist readers with a consumer problem.
  • If you have a news tip or want to report an error or omission, you can email the site publisher directly. You may also contact the post's author directly. Contact information is in the author tagline.