Can things get any worse for the TSA?

By | March 5th, 2011

To say the TSA just had a bad week would be a lot like saying Muammar Gaddafi is dealing with a little opposition in Libya.

And how.

This week’s TSA shenanigans are almost too bad to be true. I take absolutely no pleasure in reporting them, because after all, this agency is supposed to be protecting us when we travel.

Boxcutters on planes! A passenger at JFK accidentally carried three boxcutters — yep, the same kind used by the 9/11 terrorists — on a plane last week. The breach reportedly grounded the flight for three hours last Saturday night and drew fury from Port Authority cops, who accused the Transportation Security Administration of being asleep on the job. “In case anyone has forgotten, the TSA was created because of a couple boxcutter incidents,” one law enforcement source told the New York Post. The agents who let the boxcutters through are being “retrained.”

Did we forget to screen you? At least 27 officers with the Transportation Security Administration in Honolulu are reportedly being investigated because of reports that they were not screening checked-in baggage for explosives, as their jobs require. The officers worked at Lobby 4 at Honolulu Airport, which services 12 airlines. They, too, face “appropriate disciplinary action” in an ongoing investigation, according to the TSA.

Genetic pat-downs? Although TSA denies it’s doing this, The Daily reports TSA is testing a DNA scanner that would essentially give passengers a “DNA patdown.” Who do you believe?

Portable scanners coming soon? Here’s another story the TSA denies. Newly uncovered documents show that as early as 2006, the Department of Homeland Security has been planning pilot programs to deploy mobile scanning units that can be set up at public events and in train stations, along with mobile x-ray vans capable of scanning pedestrians on city streets, according to the Electronic Privacy Information Center. Soon, they’ll be everywhere.

Touch our junk and go to jail. New Hampshire has introduced a bill that would make the touching or viewing of a person’s breasts or genitals by a government security agent a sexual assault. When did it not become sexual assault? That’s what I’d like to know.

Related story:   Tick tock! Your ticket credit's gone -- and you may be a scammer

Give us more money, or else … Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano told Congress this week that luggage fees have prompted more passengers to hold onto their bags, which means more items for TSA officers to inspect at security checkpoints at a cost of about $260 million annually. She wants more money, otherwise air travelers can expect delays at the airport. As if we don’t have enough delays already.

Passengers are fed up with this nonsense.

“In the final analysis, the TSA will never make our air travel system 100 percent airtight secure,” says reader Douglas Shachnow. “And I still can’t help believing that TSA procedures at our airports are little more than theater.”

In fact, it is theater.

I’m encouraged that TSA is considering some changes to the way it screens us.

I hope it does so soon.

What do you think? Has the TSA hit rock bottom this week, or can things get any worse than this?

Yes, they can.

  • Doesn’t our illustrious House hold the purse strings for TSA – they need to “de-fund” it yesterday!!!

    Those who would sacrifice freedom for security deserve neither

    — Benjamin Franklin

We want your feedback. Your opinion is important to us. Here's how you can share your thoughts:
  • Send us a letter to the editor. We'll publish your most thoughtful missives in our daily newsletter or in an upcoming post.
  • Leave a message on one of our social networks. We have an active Facebook page, a LinkedIn presence and a Twitter account. Every story on this site is posted on those channels. The conversation ranges from completely unmoderated (Twitter) to moderated (Facebook and LinkedIn).
  • Post a question to our help forums or ask our advocates for a hand through our assistance intake form. Please note that our help forum is not a place for debate. It's there primarily to assist readers with a consumer problem.
  • If you have a news tip or want to report an error or omission, you can email the site publisher directly. You may also contact the post's author directly. Contact information is in the author tagline.