Lyft charged me $150 for cigarette burns. But I don’t smoke!

Photo of author

By Christopher Elliott

After LeeAnn Hicks takes a Lyft ride, the company broadsides her with a $150 charge for cigarette burns. But she says she didn’t cause the damage. Does she still have to pay?


After a recent ride in a Lyft rideshare, the company charged me a $150 damage fee for an alleged cigarette burn to the vehicle. I have sent numerous emails to Lyft informing them that I did not cause the damage.  

I asked Lyft for the driver’s statement and evidence that led them to conclude that I caused the damage, but I never got an answer. A Lyft representative claims the company has reviewed the damage charges. 

“As per checking the report made by your driver, it appeared that an investigation has been conducted and found that the claim was valid,” Lyft said. “With that having said, please know that no adjustment will be made to this claim.”

I do not smoke. Can you help me get my $150 back, please? — LeeAnn Hicks, Bronx, N.Y.


Lyft should not charge you for cigarette damage to one of its cars unless it has hard evidence. And there should be a system to handle any dispute arising from a damage claim.

I reviewed the photos of the alleged damage sent to Lyft by Timothy, your driver. They appear to show a small cigarette burn in the side of the passenger seat. However, they are low-resolution images. The metadata, which would show the location and type of camera used, appears to have been removed. That makes it impossible to tell if this is Timothy’s car or if you had been the passenger. (Related: Lyft surprised me with a $150 cleaning charge. Is that allowed?)

And that’s not the only thing that doesn’t make sense. If you burn a cigarette in Timothy’s car seat, that means you smoked in the vehicle. If that happened, I’m sure Timothy would have pulled over and asked you to extinguish your cigarette. But I don’t see any accompanying incident report that claims you smoked in the car. What’s more, you told me that you’ve never smoked. A Lyft representative admitted in writing that the driver only provided “anecdotal evidence of the situation.” That made me a little suspicious about this claim.

Global Rescue is the world’s leading provider of medical, security, evacuation and travel risk management services. Founded in 2004, Global Rescue has exclusive relationships with the Johns Hopkins Emergency Medicine Division of Special Operations and Elite Medical Group. Global Rescue provides best-in-class services that identify, monitor and respond to client medical and security crises. Learn more about Global Rescue.

Company dismissed the appeal

Lyft charges passengers anywhere from $20 for minor damage such as mud, dirt, or animal fur in the car, to $150 for “major” damage like biowaste all over the car or physical damage to fixtures inside or outside of the car. But it requires that drivers report the damage within two hours and take at least two photos of the damage. It isn’t clear to me if Timothy followed all of the rules.

Even if he did, there should have been some way for you to dispute the charge. However, according to the email thread between you and Lyft, the company dismissed your appeal and insisted that you pay. Despite this setback, you blocked Lyft from charging your card (smart move) and then contacted me. (Related: Lyft vomit fraud: Everything you need to know — and how to avoid it.)

You could have taken this to an executive at Lyft. I list the names, numbers and email addresses of the Lyft executives on my consumer advocacy site,

Will Lyft refund the damage fee?

Lyft should not be able to arbitrarily charge $150 to your credit card without giving you a chance to review the evidence and respond. If a driver ever alerts you to damage, in this instance cigarette burn damage, make sure you take pictures. Make note of the condition of the vehicle and be prepared to defend yourself against any charges. The system Lyft has in place appears to heavily favor its drivers and fails to give passengers their due process. It can do better. (Here’s what you need to know before you rent your next car.)

I contacted Lyft on your behalf. 

“After a thorough investigation into the claim, we found that the description of the events did not warrant enough proof that the passenger created the damage, therefore we elected to refund the damage fee,” a Lyft spokeswoman told me.

Photo of author

Christopher Elliott

Christopher Elliott is the founder of Elliott Advocacy, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization that empowers consumers to solve their problems and helps those who can't. He's the author of numerous books on consumer advocacy and writes three nationally syndicated columns. He also publishes the Elliott Report, a news site for consumers, and Elliott Confidential, a critically acclaimed newsletter about customer service. If you have a consumer problem you can't solve, contact him directly through his advocacy website. You can also follow him on X, Facebook, and LinkedIn, or sign up for his daily newsletter.

Related Posts