What's the book corporate America doesn't want you to read? Find out now -- or you could get scammed.

Full text of SD 1544-09-06 authorizing pat-downs, physical inspections

December 27, 2009

Since the government has been unresponsive to my requests to clarify its new security measures, I thought it would be best to publish the security directive in its entirety.

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Transportation Security Administration

Aviation Security Directive

Subject: Security Directive
Number: SD 1544-09-06
Date: December 25, 2009

EXPIRATION: 0200Z on December 30, 2009

This Security Directive (SD) must be implemented immediately. The measures contained in this SD are in addition to all other SDs currently in effect for your operations.

INFORMATION: On December 25, 2009, a terrorist attack was attempted against a flight traveling to the United States. TSA has identified security measures to be implemented by airports, aircraft operators, and foreign air carriers to mitigate potential threats to flights.

APPLICABILITY: THIS SD APPLIES TO AIRCRAFT OPERATORS THAT CARRY OUT A SECURITY PROGRAM REGULATED UNDER 49 CODE OF FEDERAL REGULATIONS (CFR)1544.101(a).

ACTIONS REQUIRED: If you conduct scheduled and/or public charter flight operations under a Full Program under 49 CFR 1544.101(a) departing from any foreign location to the United States (including its territories and possessions), you must immediately implement all measures in this SD for each such flight.

1. BOARDING GATE

1. The aircraft operator or authorized air carrier representative must ensure all passengers are screened at the boarding gate during the boarding process using the following procedures. These procedures are in addition to the screening of all passengers at the screening checkpoint.

1. Perform thorough pat-down of all passengers at boarding gate prior to boarding, concentrating on upper legs and torso.
2. Physically inspect 100 percent of all passenger accessible property at the boarding gate prior to boarding, with focus on syringes being transported along with powders and/or liquids.
3. Ensure the liquids, aerosols, and gels restrictions are strictly adhered to in accordance with SD 1544-06-02E.

2. During the boarding process, the air carrier may exempt passengers who are Heads of State or Heads of Government from the measures outlined in Section I.A. of this SD, including the following who are traveling with the Head of State or Head of Government:

1. Spouse and children, or
2. One other individual (chosen by the Head of State or Head of Government)

3. For the purposes of Section I.B., the following definitions apply:

1. Head of State: An individual serving as the chief public representative of a monarchic or republican nation-state, federation, commonwealth, or any other political state (for example, King, Queen, and President).

2. Head of Government: The chief officer of the executive branch of a government presiding over a cabinet (for example, Prime Minister, Premier, President, and Monarch).

2. IN FLIGHT

1. During flight, the aircraft operator must ensure that the following procedures are followed:

1. Passengers must remain in seats beginning 1 hour prior to arrival at destination.
2. Passenger access to carry-on baggage is prohibited beginning 1 hour prior to arrival at destination.
3. Disable aircraft-integrated passenger communications systems and services (phone, internet access services, live television programming, global positioning systems) prior to boarding and during all phases of flight.
4. While over U.S. airspace, flight crew may not make any announcement to passengers concerning flight path or position over cities or landmarks.
5. Passengers may not have any blankets, pillows, or personal belongings on the lap beginning 1 hour prior to arrival at destination.

AIRCRAFT OPERATOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT: The aircraft operator must immediately provide written confirmation to its assigned PSI indicating receipt of this SD.

AIRCRAFT OPERATOR dissemination required: The aircraft operator must immediately pass the information and directives set forth in this SD to all stations affected, and provide written confirmation to its PSI, indicating that all stations affected have acknowledged receipt of the information and directives set forth in this SD. The aircraft operator must disseminate this information to its senior management personnel, ground security coordinators, and supervisory security personnel at all affected locations. All aircraft operator personnel implementing this SD must be briefed by the aircraft operator on its content and the restrictions governing dissemination. No other dissemination may be made without prior approval of the Assistant Secretary for the Transportation Security Administration. Unauthorized dissemination of this document or information contained herein is prohibited by 49 CFR Part 1520 (see 69 Fed. Reg. 28066 (May 18, 2004).

APPROVAL OF ALTERNATIVE MEASURES: With respect to the provisions of this SD, as stated in 49 CFR 1544.305(d), the aircraft operator may submit in writing to its PSI proposed alternative measures and the basis for submitting the alternative measures for approval by the Assistant Administrator for Transportation Sector Network Management. The aircraft operator must immediately notify its PSI whenever any procedure in this SD cannot be carried out by a government authority charged with performing security procedures.

FOR TSA ACTION ONLY: The TSA must issue this SD immediately to the corporate security element of all affected U.S. aircraft operators.

FOR STATE DEPARTMENT: Retransmittal to appropriate foreign posts is authorized. Post must refer to STATE 162917, 201826Z Sep 01, Subject: FAA Security Directives and Information Circulars: Definitions and Handling, for specific guidance and dissemination.

Gale Rossides
Acting Administrator

(Photo: aka_zoe/Flickr Creative Commons)

Christopher Elliott is the author of Scammed: How to Save Your Money and Find Better Service in a World of Schemes, Swindles, and Shady Deals. Critics have called it “eye-opening” and “inspiring” — it’ll “grab your attention and won’t let go.” Order your copy now on Amazon, Barnes & Noble or iTunes.

100 comments

  • AntiVigilante

    PROFILE ALL SHARP DRESSED MEN SMUGGLING IN SUDANESE WHO ARE REALLY FROM NIGERIA AND WHOSE FATHER WARNED THE EMBASSY THEY WERE IN YEMEN IN A TERRORIST TRAINING CAMP!

    DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!DOWN WITH SHARP DRESSED MEN!

  • Pingback: TSA Subpoenas Bloggers | Flight Wisdom

  • john 2000

    I sure would like to have a sense of the hh:mm time-line of the directive being received by you and the actual “incident” on the flight. That was some pretty quick and detailed stuff from the acting administrator, on Christmas Day no less. It’s almost as if the directive already existed. TSA should be investigated to when the directive was fabricated also.

  • Mac

    This is a win-win for the terrorists. If the plane had gone down, they win because of the tragedy, then also because of the ensuing chaos (long term as we are now experiencing). So the plane didn’t go down. They still win because of the (ensuing) long term chaos as we are now going to experience until who-knows-when! I am not sure that the TSA really knows what they are doing or should be doing.

    This seems to me to be a lot of scrambling around LOOKING busy but not really getting anything done.

    The terrorists are laughing themselves silly seeing how the chaos has spread and how imposed-upon air travelers are having to cope with all of this nonsense. Like all of these new restrictions are going to keep us safe? I do not think so. But they will keep us in line longer, and even more uncomfortable while in the air, and holding our bladders when we usually have to go the most, at then end of the flight. Like now the gov’t is going to regulate MY bladder? One of our most precious rights is being taken away. The right to relieve oneself when necessary. Maybe they can issue each passenger a paper towel and one empty plastic bottle or we could just use the barf bag. Nothing like turning your air travel into a third-world country experience.

  • Arkyump

    This is your captain, we are flying over Mecca, be prepared to bail out.

  • Pingback: TSA Fights The Real Problem - Bloggers | Fred Posner dot com

  • ian

    Yet another good reason to take AmTrak instead. Yes, it make take a day longer, but you’re not going through a process that manages to both humiliate and be ineffective at the same time.

    Explain to me how any of this would stop some whack job from simply shooting down an airplane with an uzi or a stinger missile near an airport? What does TSA plan to do? Install monitoring cameras in each private home or office within 10 miles of all USA airports?

  • http://rantingsofanindependentthinker.blogspot.com Bill

    I look forward to flying naked after the anal probe. This is the only sure fire way to ensure no one has anything on them (literally) to blow themselves up.

    My solution:
    1. Everyone goes through metal detectors (already doing).
    2. Everyone gets a quick sniff from explosive sniffing dog.
    3. Anyone acting suspicious is sent to full body scan.
    3a. Anyone with a Muslim/middle eastern sounding name is sent to full body scan (not all Muslims are terrorists, but all/most terrorists are Muslim/from middle east).
    3a1 – If Muslim’s/middle eastern people don’t like it, they can take action to police their own people and maybe get them to stop trying to blow people up.
    3b. Anyone refusing to cooperate is taken into custody till their risk is determined. If risk, arrest and hand over to FBI. If no risk, put on permanent no fly list and no compensation.
    4. Remind people that flying is a voluntary way to travel. Don’t like the rules? — Don’t fly!

  • Pingback: The chilling effect: TSA tries to plug a leak by slapping travel bloggers with subpoenas | Upgrade: Travel Better

  • Pingback: Chris Elliott submits objection to DHS subpoena over security directive disclosure | Tnooz

  • Pingback: Bloggers Who Posted TSA Instructions Get TSA Subpoenas - Hit & Run : Reason Magazine

  • http://www.advicegoddess.com Amy Alkon

    The only way to be safe is to do exploratory surgery on all passengers before boarding to make sure they haven’t swallowed explosives drug-mule-style.

  • Pingback: Bill Ryan’s Other Blog » Blog Archive » Freedom of Speech, Just Watch What you Say

  • Alice

    When did the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution get repealed?

  • Pingback: Did Google Get A TSA Subpoena Over Security Directive? It Can’t Say

  • Kristin

    @ Alice: From all the post-publishing legal actions, both the 1st and the 4th amendments to the US Constitution appear to have been repealed.

  • Pingback: In reversal, DHS withdraws subpoena of journalist Chris Elliott | Tnooz

  • Pingback: TSA withdraws subpoenas over leaked security directive | Homeland Stupidity

  • m3th

    TSA threats/bullying in relation to the publication of this information (information the TSA sent to thousands of places):

    http://rawstory.com/2009/12/tsa-strongarms-bloggers/

    Bloggers are having their harddisks taken from them, etc.

  • Charlie Chaplin

    Too bad the TSA wasn’t around in the early 1900′s. We could have had hours of entertainment watching their antics on the big screen along with the Keystone Cops.

  • http://tek-tips.nethawk.net Rob

    So it seems that the attempt to coerce the name of the provider of this document to these guys was simply to avoid embarrassment? The embarrassment being the after-the-fact attempt to take some rudimentary measures in the wake of their jobs? And when they realized it was more embarrassing to make a stink over it, especially since it was everywhere, thus bringing to light their overly zealous intimidation tactics against your rights, they backed off? Is that the way you guys see this? Is this Nepolitano at the buck stop? It would seem by now they would have been able to figure out how to handle airports, yet I am more terrified by the TSA people, than I am by the real terrorists.

  • Pingback: US Government alienated rights of citizen again « New Economic Thought

  • Sturle

    This is just silly. What retard would want to blow his bomb during the last hour of the flight when most of the fuel is spent? A two year old just potty trained child who is denied access to the toilet, perhaps. Airport security is just an expensive and time consuming theatre for the customers. Even El Al allows equipment with lithium batteries on board. If one shorts and catches fire, it will be impossible to extinguish. It doesn’t need to be touched. Most computers are able to switch on at a specified time, even slightly modified ones. Boom, luggage on fire.

    Drop the entire theatre and spend the resources on finding the terrorists. Be somewhat extra suspicious of people from terrorist training camps in Yemen whose concerned father calls and warns the embassy, perhaps.

  • John

    This is strictly a continuance of the attempt to control every phase of our lives. Well I’m not buying it, as it was a false flag anyway, and will never fly again. We appear very close to hitting critcal mass in this country which is why I moved hundreds of miles from any major city. The real terrorists are within the boarders of the USA and not in some far off land.

  • Pingback: Welcome to Con Air, welcome to the freedom! - The Moscow Expat Forums

  • Pingback: EFF Helps Blogger Subpoenaed by TSA, TSA Backs Down | Left to chance

  • Dave

    Great, the show goes on. They had already created a “ritual” of “security” to impress/depress the travelling public and create an illusion of safety, at the expense of quality of life. There will always be nutters. You can’t legislate against every nutter out there. There will always be individuals who blow up airplanes, murder random people, etc. So it was, is and always will be. You have to take *reasonable* measures to protect people but there comes a point where the risk/benefit balance is tipped.

    I just want to say that as a parent with a baby (lots of baby stuff needed – oh and access to it too) and a toddler just out of nappies (diapers) (access to a toilet on-demand required, or piss all over aircraft – soiling fee?) I will be avoiding this crazy paranoid country as I do not want me and my family to be treated like animals in this way.

    Family package holiday to Disneyland anyone? No thanks. I think I’ll go to Paris instead.

  • Jay

    Visited the uSa 10-15 years ago, travelled all over the country, guess 10-12000 miles on amtrak, reckon have seen enough for a long time.

    Immigration queues are known to be long, so not fun to be told that can’t use the toilet before landing and have to wait until have gotten thru immigration.

    Plenty of other countries to visit before UsA

  • Pingback: Chris Elliott, Full text of SD 1544-09-06 authorizing pat-downs, physical inspections, and subpoenas « Offbeat Travel Blog

  • Pingback: xenoactive.org » Blog Archive » When The TSA Is At Your Door…

  • Pingback: Finance Geek » The TSA’s Intimidation Of Bloggers Over Leaked Security Rules Is A Disgrace

  • Pingback: The TSA’s Intimidation Of Bloggers Over Leaked Security Rules Is A Disgrace | TechBlogs Today

  • Pingback: The double standards of blogging: Report like a journalist, respond like a citizen « Soup of Media

  • Pingback: New TSA security measures mean long-term changes for air travel | Tnooz

  • Pingback: Intelligent Travel Blog

  • Pingback: EFF Helps Blogger Subpoenaed by TSA, TSA Backs Down « Help Topic Business Information

  • Pingback: ETF FOOL

  • aughra

    Does anyone have an explanation regarding why TSA assumes that the last hour of the flight is the most dangerous, and therefore limits movement/activity in the plane at that time? Is it only because that’s when this last incident took place? Isn’t this new directive, then, as short-sighted and reactionary as assuming all shoes can be turned into bombs–because that’s how the last guy tried it?

    That sums up my problem with the TSA–all policies are reactionary rather than proactive. It means we’ll always be one step behind the disaster, rather than preventing it. I guess I’ll be doing more driving; none of this makes anyone safer, only more annoyed.

  • ByeByeTourists

    Stupid, reactionary, imbecilic and frankly useless… What the hell is the TSA’s remit anyway? To make the US look like a bunch of fundemental zenophobic hysterics? Anyone with a slight understanding of airline operations could bypass all the new rules and regs… The terrorists win again even when they fail with this sort of dumbass directive. The multitude of honest decent folk get lumbered with more hoops to jump through with no security gain… Will be taking my hard earned holiday money elseware and I know I won’t be alone.
    BTW: Has anyone checked trading activity on the full body scanner manufacturers stock BEFORE the detroit flight? Just asking, you know!

  • Pingback: TSA strong-arms bloggers who published new airport procedures | We Are Change Utah

  • Kevin Dunphy

    Yes, let’s fortify the Maginot Line known as airport security once again. Never mind the possibility of an airport employee using a valid airport ID to bypass a security checkpoint to get a bomb or a gun on an airplane. After all, the Maginot Line worked so well that the Germans invaded France by going around it, not through it.

  • Pingback: Papers, Please! » Blog Archive » Lessons from the case of the man who set his underpants on fire

  • Pingback: Analysis: Public kept in dark about new TSA flying rules « Hacking Away

  • Pingback: Screw terrorists: US security forces go after the journalists who upset them « blogs.independent.co.uk

  • Pingback: A Perfect Example of the Need for a Federal Shield Law « Stacey Woelfel

  • Kristin

    I am a teacher with 9 years of college under my belt. I would be fired immediately for taking any action like the TSA agents. If I think a child has a gun, I cannot pat them down and take naked photos of them. This is NOT about security it is about the government trying to control our every move.

    I read in one blog earlier today, that if these screening were in place before 9-11 we would not be complaining today. Well I would have complained then and I am complaining now. I will not be flying until my rights are re-instated, or better methods of screening can take place. Why are we not x-raying? The scanners have radiation so do x-rays, I am sure there is a difference in levels, but I would prefer more privacy and more radiation of an x-ray.

    A TSA agent groping my body parts is one thing, grouping my teenage daughter and son is completely a different matter.
    We have the technology to do better than this, we need to stand up for our rights and not be afraid of the terrorists. I mean seriously, there have been terrorists since the beginning of human times. What in the heck do you think the Indians thought of us? Basically we were terrorists to them in this country, the great US of A. We release lethal diseases in the Native American populations to decrease their numbers. Terrorism is everywhere and has been for a long time. We risk our lives everyday just by waking up. don’t let the government for the people, by the people change into the government in charge of the people and their legal rights to privacy. My two cents

  • http://wordpress.pocosin.com Counsel

    I’d like to know if Elliott.org was contacted by TSA about posting the SD. If so, what happened? :)

    Kristin: Governmental agencies are those that must provide warnings or have “reasonable suspicion” for the Pat-Down (See Terry v. Ohio – the “Terry Stop”). Private firms you contract with can implement screenings/searches that you can agree to by agreeing to the contract.

    US. v. Davis is a 9th Circuit case re: airport searches. While I may not agree that a contract with a private firm waives my 4th Amendment protections, the 9th Circuit appears to disagree with me ;p

  • http://www.nib.com.au/home/newtonib/travel/Pages/TravelInsurance.aspx Travel Insurance

    Immigration queues in US is possible the worst thing about travelling in the states , i came in to fews sticky situations and would advise to buy travel insurance before travelling

  • Pingback: The continuing fallout of NW253 – IFE is back on … but… - Ghetto IFE

  • http://latevil.la LateVilla

    I am completely in favor of better security, such as the body-scan imaging systems, but I oppose rules that reduce everyone else’s quality of life and travel enjoyment without providing a tangible security benefit.

Previous post:

Next post: