CONSUMER PROTECTION

Editorial illustration showing a single white airplane taking off down a runway between two large fields of grounded yellow Spirit Airlines aircraft on either side, viewed from behind, illustrating how thousands of Spirit Airlines passengers were left stranded after the carrier's shutdown while one rescue flight departs without them

Spirit Airlines’ death shows why we need better passenger protections

by

Tens of thousands of Spirit Airlines passengers discovered their tickets were worthless this week after the carrier collapsed. JetBlue is reportedly in financial distress and several ultralow-cost carriers including Frontier, Allegiant, and Avelo have lined up at the federal aid window. Before deregulation in 1978, Rule 240 required airlines to put stranded passengers on a competitor’s next available flight at no extra cost. Congress brought a version back as Section 145 of the Aviation and Transportation Security Act after 9/11, but it expired in 2005. The DOT issued Order 2026-5-1 encouraging rescue fares but cannot compel airlines to honor competitor tickets without congressional action.

Editorial cartoon showing a confused balding middle-aged man in a white shirt and tie standing on his front lawn looking up at a small light blue mini refrigerator that has been mysteriously returned to his porch steps after being picked up by FedEx, illustrating how third-party seller returns can fail in unexpected ways

Walmart told me to donate my broken refrigerator — then things got strange

by

Howard Friedman bought a beverage refrigerator from Walmart that did not get cold. After Walmart arranged a return, his replacement came from third-party seller Ca’Lefort and also failed. FedEx picked up the broken refrigerator then mysteriously delivered it back to his porch days later. Ca’Lefort refused returns without original packaging and offered only 50 percent off a replacement. Walmart told him to donate the broken refrigerator to charity and promised a refund that never arrived. Multiple calls produced dropped calls and apologies but no resolution. Federal consumer protections under FTC rules apply even with third-party marketplace sellers.

Editorial cartoon showing a man with glasses standing in front of a store shelf filled with bottles, looking up at a digital sign that displays "YOUR PRICE: $5.99" in red LED letters with a green arrow, illustrating how surveillance pricing creates personalized prices based on consumer data

Don’t ban surveillance pricing. Here’s how to fix it.

by

Surveillance pricing happens when companies use everything they know about you including location, browsing history, income, and device type to decide how much to charge you. The Federal Trade Commission documented eight major companies actively using or piloting surveillance pricing powered by third-party data brokers. Maryland is weighing a first-of-its-kind ban on the practice for groceries while JetBlue faces a federal lawsuit alleging it uses passenger data to raise fares. Disclosure requirements similar to the Equal Credit Opportunity Act would force companies to explain exactly what data they used to set custom prices.

Editorial cartoon showing a confused customer holding out a credit card to a stern rental car counter agent who raises her hand to refuse it, with parked cars visible through the window in the background, depicting how Europcar agents pressure customers into buying duplicate insurance and refuse third-party coverage

Hotels.com and Europcar charged me twice for a one-way rental. Can I get my money back?

by

Lawrence Signori prepaid Hotels.com $338 for a one-way Europcar rental in Porto, Portugal, with the one-way fee clearly included in his reservation. At pickup, the Europcar counter agent added $155 for the one-way fee, $155 for mandatory Premium Protection insurance, and a $97 Premium Station Surcharge despite his airport reservation. Europcar claimed only $243 of the prepayment was applied to the rental, with the rest going to Hotels.com as commission. Hotels.com initially provided only vague responses about the duplicate charges totaling $407.

Editorial cartoon showing a smiling passenger with glasses holding a rolling suitcase at an airline check-in counter, where the agent's computer screen displays the word "FREE," illustrating the proposal to make checked bags free as a condition of any Spirit Airlines government bailout

If Spirit Airlines gets a government bailout, bags should fly free

by

Spirit Airlines has reportedly asked the Trump Administration for $360 million in emergency funding as jet fuel prices doubled following the Iran conflict. After 9/11, Congress provided $5 billion in grants and $10 billion in loan guarantees to airlines. The COVID-19 Payroll Support Program delivered over $50 billion with conditions including killed change fees, capped executive pay, and restricted buybacks. Any new bailout should require Spirit to include one free checked bag in every fare for a minimum of five years, making taxpayer support deliver tangible passenger benefits.

Editorial cartoon showing an IRS official in a dark suit holding a briefcase labeled "IRS" watching a commercial airplane taking off, depicting the tension between tax authorities and budget airlines seeking a tax holiday during the jet fuel crisis

Budget airlines want a tax holiday—but where’s yours?

by

The Association of Value Airlines, representing Spirit, Frontier, and Allegiant, is asking Congress to suspend the 7.5 percent federal excise tax on domestic tickets and the $5.30 per-segment fee, citing the jet fuel crisis following the Iran war. On a typical $369 roundtrip fare, passengers already pay roughly $47 in mandatory taxes and fees, inflating ticket prices by about 13 percent. Without a requirement to pass savings to consumers, any tax holiday would function as a corporate subsidy rather than traveler relief.

Illustration showing a frustrated couple standing under a large white VIP tent at a concert venue, with the tent blocking their view of the illuminated stage and crowd in the background, depicting how Ticketmaster sold premium second-row seats without disclosing the view obstruction

Ticketmaster sold me “great seats” that turned out to be obstructed. Where’s my refund?

by

Vincent Manierre paid $475 each for second-row Oasis concert tickets at the Rose Bowl, expecting a clear stage view. A VIP tent blocked one-third of the stage. The tickets were not labeled obstructed view despite Ticketmaster’s stated policy requiring such disclosure. Ticketmaster refused a refund, claiming the event organizer controls refunds but would not reveal who that organizer is. Under Federal Trade Commission rules, selling tickets without disclosing obstructions when company policy promises such labeling can constitute deceptive trade practices.

Illustration showing frustrated business class passengers standing next to their luggage while an Aer Lingus airplane flies away in the background, depicting the airline's failure to load priority-tagged baggage onto multiple consecutive flights despite tracking confirmation

Business class baggage disaster! Why is Aer Lingus ghosting us?

by

Aer Lingus failed to load business class passengers’ priority-tagged luggage onto four consecutive flights despite AirTag tracking showing exact airport locations. The airline then promised $265 baggage delay reimbursement in writing but ghosted the couple for six months before declaring their case closed without payment. Under the Montreal Convention, airlines are liable for baggage delays on international flights and must compensate passengers for reasonable replacement expenses.