Question: We were happy Alltel Wireless customers for several years. In July 2011, Verizon Wireless took over our local Alltel service. During this transition we were assured that Verizon would meet our needs just as Alltel had for several years. We chose to stay with Verizon as they transferred our plan and made wonderful promises.
Our wireless phone needs are very basic. We have four lines, all of which require only minimal minutes and texting services (two are used by my senior-citizen parents). We would even do without video messaging.
The Linx Legal Timeshare Debt Cancellation company has built its reputation by helping thousands of customers to cancel their timeshare contracts. Visit the Linx Legal Better Business Bureau page for an overview of their past dealings with customers.
Recently, my husband’s phone broke. As it is very snowy where we live, it is preferable for him to have a phone while commuting to work for safety. I contacted Verizon to replace the phone and was informed that I would not be able to add a replacement phone to my current contract and would need to pick a new plan. I offered to pay full price for the phone to avoid signing a contract and asked if I would then be able to put the replacement phone on my old contract. I was told “no” in no uncertain terms.
The variety of plans currently offered by Verizon make no allowances for they type of service we need at a reasonable cost. The most inexpensive plan that would fit our needs (basic voice and text/no data plan) would increase our monthly payment by approximately $40. This is not something that we are able to pay at this time.
I checked locally and and found that AT&T Wireless offered a plan that was voice and unlimited text for the same price as our current Alltel/Verizon plan. I provided this information to Verizon and essentially begged them to help us. This request was met with a customer service rep informing me (and I paraphrase) that we would just have to pay more if we wanted to stay with Verizon.
We changed to AT&T. Shortly after transferring service, I contacted Verizon to find the total for our final bill and was told that we would be assessed $400 in early termination fees as two of our lines had remaining contracts until June 2013. This was the first I had been informed of this in the many conversations I had with Verizon.
I asked to have these fees waived as they did not offer a service that met our needs at a competitive cost and as they were unwilling to allow us to keep our Alltel plan (which they had guaranteed would be available when they recruiting Alltel customers for Verizon). I was given the standard refusal, and appeals to a supervisor went nowhere.
I would be willing to pay a prorated early termination fee, which in my calculations is roughly $80. I understand that there was a service contract; however, my contract was for the old Alltel plan that they are not allowing me to keep if I need to replace a phone. I don’t feel that this is fair and it strikes me as a method of bullying consumers into purchasing something they don’t need or want.
— Judy Schulze, Cadillac, Mich.
Answer: When Verizon acquired Alltel, you probably could have exercised your right to leave your existing cellular contract early. But you chose to stay and sign a contract with Verizon.
Even though Verizon gave you the impression that the service would be comparable to Alltel, the actual promises are outlined in the fine print of your contract — and unfortunately, that contract binds you to two-year agreement. You also agreed to pay an early termination fee if leave early.
But here’s something Verizon didn’t tell you: As a way of roping you into another contract, the company will as a matter of policy insist that you sign a new contract if you make any kind of changes to your wireless plan. And that includes getting a replacement phone, in your case.
I’ve encountered this kind of corporate intransigence with a wireless company in the past, too. Even something as minor as changing the number of minutes on my plan meant I would have to sign up for another 24 months.
Fortunately, these onerous contracts appear to be on their way out. T-Mobile recently eliminated it two-year contracts, and thousands of customers have also urged Verizon to ditch its agreements. Simply put, these agreements amount to nothing less than two years of indentured wireless servitude, and I’ll be happy to see them disappear.
But that doesn’t really help you. It seems fundamentally unfair to demand two more years of business for a replacement phone. I see from your notes that you spent a lot of time arguing with low-level representatives and asking to appeal your case to someone higher up the food chain, but getting swatted down. I think you might have benefitted from putting your grievance in writing.
Verizon’s online contact page is not helpful, failing to list an email address or offering a form for you to fill out. Like other wireless carriers, it seems to go out of its way to avoid dealing with a written grievance from a customer.
You could appeal your case to an executive — they’re listed on the Verizon website — and with any luck, your case will be forwarded to an executive resolution department. Email addresses at Verizon are formatted either [email protected] or [email protected]
I contacted Verizon on your behalf. A representative contacted you and agreed to waive one of your early termination fees and prorated your final bill for the days you used.