What's the book corporate America doesn't want you to read? Find out now -- or you could get scammed.

Truthsquadding the Southwest Airlines “Act of God” controversy: “Ultimately this is a reporting error run amok”

July 25, 2010

During the last week, several news outlets and bloggers — including most recently, the Arizona Daily Star — have breathlessly reported that Southwest Airlines quietly revised its contract to define mechanical delays as an “Act of God.”

Seriously? Mechanical delays are now the work of the Almighty?

As someone who almost attended seminary, I was interested in that development from a theological perspective. I feel sorry for my friends at Southwest who had to answer my email — and on a Sunday, no less. But much to their credit, they did.


Here’s what the airline’s contract says:

Force Majeure Event means any event outside of Carrier’s control, including, without limitation, acts of God, meteorological events, such as storms, rain, wind, fire, fog, flooding, earthquakes, haze, volcanic eruption or any other event, including, without limitation, government action, disturbances or potentially volatile international conditions, civil commotions, riots, embargoes, wars, or hostilities, whether actual, threatened, or reported, strikes, work stoppage, slowdown, lockout or any other labor related dispute involving or affecting Carrier’s service, mechanical difficulties, Air Traffic Control, the inability to obtain fuel, labor or landing facilities for the flight in question or any fact not reasonably foreseen, anticipated or predicted by Carrier.

The consensus among my media colleagues seems to be that Southwest is saying all mechanical delays are beyond its control — that they are essentially an act of God.

Unless you’re a Calvinist, this is theologically problematic. So I checked with Southwest to see how it interprets its new contract.

“I have learned today that despite lengthy phone calls and explanations with both the Arizona Daily Star and Smarter Travel, confusion still reigns supreme,” said spokeswoman Linda Rutherford. “Other news accounts have been taking ‘mechanical difficulties’ completely out of context. So, ultimately this is a reporting error run amok in our new age of the Internet.”

Rurtherford says Southwest had never before defined force majeure events in its contract of carriage, which is its legal agreement between customers and the carrier.

She adds,

In our latest update, we offered our definition, which states that “Force Majeure Event means any event outside of Carrier’s control” and so the “mechanical difficulties” we are referring to as Force Majeure events would be those outside of our control, such as airport mechanical difficulties (e.g., the airport de-icing system breaks) or Air Traffic Control issues (e.g., airport or regional tower goes down).

We are not referring to our own aircraft mechanical difficulties, which would clearly be under our control. Our policies and practices confirm this interpretation.

None of our procedures have changed — we still accommodate customers exactly the same as we did previously in the event of our own aircraft mechanical issues occur.

In other words, Southwest is defining mechanical difficulties that it can’t control and that are classified as a force majeure event.

As I review the contract language, I don’t necessarily see how Southwest is calling mechanical delays an act of God. But I think it would be helpful to clear that up during the next contract revision.

(Photo: Swami bu/Flickr Creative Commons)

Christopher Elliott is the author of Scammed: How to Save Your Money and Find Better Service in a World of Schemes, Swindles, and Shady Deals. Critics have called it “eye-opening” and “inspiring” — it’ll “grab your attention and won’t let go.” Order your copy now on Amazon, Barnes & Noble or iTunes.

17 comments

  • http://blog.flightwisdom.com Flight Wisdom

    Chris, we looked at this last night…

    http://blog.flightwisdom.com/2010/07/25/the-plane-is-broken-but-dont-blame-us-its-force-majeure/

    Act of God and Force Majeure are not quite synonyms. We went over what traditionally the obligation to prove force majeure in a court of law is.

    And Linda points out that their policies and practices do generally confirm what she says is the proper interpretation. However, as you pointed out, most casual observers agree that the contract of carriage does not logically lead to the conclusion Southwest Airlines says it will follow, and thus they definitely should consider rewording the language to be more specific.

  • SirWired

    If that is truly what Southwest really means (and frankly, if it were any other airline, I’d say they were full of it), then the error is not in “reporting”, its with some real sloppy lawyers.

    The CoC CLEARLY states that “mechanical difficulties” can be regarded as a Force Majeure event. This is not “out of context” or some tortured reading of the contract language. The language is confusing, at best. I can think of many ways in which an airline could argue that a mechanical difficulty was “outside of its control.” For instance, an emergency Airworthiness Directive…

    If Southwest truly means what they are saying privately, then they should amend the language to read: “mechanical difficulties with equipment not owned or operated by SWA”; that would clear things up in a hurry.

  • Ryan

    I think you missed the words ‘or any other event, including without limitation’, which appeared AFTER the specified Acts of God were described. By your reading mechanical difficulties as acts of God, you would also, then have to read all the other described items as acts of God. By your definition God would cause government action, embargos, wars and strikes among many other items.

  • http://gottogovacationrentals.com Tom

    It looks like with the wording they used, nothing is ever going to be their fault. No organization can be held accountable for things like sever weather or civil unrest, but they should be able handle basic things like fuel and maintenance. I hope that the wording was inadvertent.

  • Barry Graham

    They are not claiming mechanical failures are an act of G-d however it is not reasonable to shirk their responsibility which mechanical failures are.

  • David Z

    Carver…Farrell…maybe you can help? :)

  • http://www.wanderingaramean.com Wandering Aramean

    It is their CoC and it is up to them to be specific about what they are covering. If they mean mechanical failures of airport equipment rather than aircraft then that is what they should state. They are the ONLY carrier that has included this clause in their CoC and I don’t trust them at all to enforce it in my favor should the time come.

  • Ed

    Well, let’s look at this, shall we? What causes a mechanical problem? A part breaks or wears down. What causes a part to bread or wear down, most likely fatigue. Which in turn is ultimately a force of entropy. Entropy is a force of nature, which by definition is an act of god. So a mechanical failure is an act of god, QED!

  • Les

    I completely agree with @SirWired. Either the wording of this C of C is the work of sloppy lawyers (well – it could be) or SWA has left itself a loophole it could drive a 737 through.

    By the way – the phrase, “contract of carriage, which is its legal agreement between customers and the carrier” – is somewhat misleading. It could perhaps be amended to read, ” the legal conditions a customer is forced to accept in return for a ticket “.

  • Joe Farrell

    Help? With what? These are contracts of adhesion. you have zero ability to negotiate the terms – meaning they are tightly construed against their drafters – I simply cannot imagine a court anywhere allowing WN to negotiate away their common law [and federal regulatory] obligation to ensure properly maintained aircraft = One of these days an airline is going to overreach so far that their entire contract of carriage will be set aside for being unconscionable. Its like the Cruise contracts – if you read them they have no obligation to leave port, do anything or go anywhere . . ..

    WN says it only applies to other peoples mechanical problems and ATC failures. Like the Arizona bill and racial profiling, we shall see how it is put into practice in order to decide if they actually will enforce it that way. . . .

  • MVFlyer

    The lawyers may not be sloppy–maybe they’re very smart, with a vague rule that’s completely unenforceable and easy to manipulate.

    And quite frankly, I don’t care what Linda Rutherford said–regardless of the *intent* of the rule, it seems to me the written portion linking the term ‘mechanical difficulties’ with ‘acts of God’ with no qualifiers gives Southwest a huge out.

  • http://www.wordhole.com Boon Sheridan

    I look forward to the day when Calvinism takes hold in the airline industry.

    It would do away with attempts to rationalize awkward language or customer service with a wave of “we all strive for perfection – what makes you believe YOU deserve it? NEXT!”

    Carriages of Contract will be seen as needless. There are a limited number of people who get to their destination so sell as many tickets for a flight and let those who deem themselves worthy get on the plane. Those left at the gate were doomed by their own misdeeds anyway.

    “Perseverance of the saints” INDEED.

  • Julia Silvers

    Force majeure is French for “superior force” which is why contract language specifies events “outside their control.” Although Acts of God are listed first (and clarified with numerous meteorolgical examples), a lot of other conditions are listed before mechanical difficulties including war, civil commotions, embargoes, etc., which I doubt any reasonable reader of the actual contract language would consider an act of God. Sloppy reporters at the AZ Daily Star.

  • http://www.nslphotographyblog.com Ned Levi

    Chris, I think Southwest Airlines spokesperson, Linda Rutherford, is speaking out of both sides of her mouth at the same time and it’s coming up Red-Red-Red, on the Truth-O-Meter.

    I’ve read the Southwest Contract of Carriage for myself.

    The word mechanical shows up in three places. In the first two locations it is in the Force Majeure Event section, including it as a Force Majeure Event.

    According to the Dictionary, “Force Majeure – a natural and unavoidable catastrophe that interrupts the expected course of events; “he discovered that his house was not insured against acts of G-d”

    In the last instance it’s in the Service Interruption Section and it clearly says that Southwest is not liable for service interruptions due to mechanical difficulties. It does give an out for anything in 9a above that section, however, there is no mention of mechanical difficulties in 9a above that.

    Personally I think that Southwest will follow their Contract of Carriage and not Rutherford’s legally unenforceable utterance.

    Despite Rutherford’s claim that this is “this is a reporting error run amok in our new age of the Internet” it’s clear to me that Southwest is equating mechanical difficulties to an “act of G-d.” Nowhere in the Contract of Carriage do they distinguish their mechanical problems from mechanical problems in general. That adds up to a lie on the part of Southwest to me.

  • Paul Lawler

    I just hate it when people don’t understand the purpose of a COMMA! ;o)

  • Pingback: Force Majeure

  • Bill

    If you speak to devout Christians, they regard pretty much anything as an act of God. Even if you do something for them, they will thank God for it. If you make a wise decision and build your house on a hill and are not flooded like your neighbors on the valley floor, they will say to thank God for not having the river flood your property. It would have nothing to do with your decision to build on the hill.

    If the flight attentant spills hot coffee on you, it is an act of God. If some kid kicks your seat, it is an act of God.

    This could also be to the passengers’ advantage. For example, if you are late and miss your flight, it is an act of God, therefore you needn’t worry about your ticket being no good. If you fail to purchase your ticket far enough in advance, that too is an act of God, so you should be entitled to the advance discount.

    It is all a matter of perspective.

Previous post:

Next post: