Although there is plenty of ongoing discussion about a passenger bill of rights, no industry association has come out against the proposed legislation. Until now.
The Business Travel Coalition, an organization that advocates for corporate travel buyers, has condemned the new rules, saying they would reduce the margin of safety, increase the number of canceled flights and lead to higher airfares.
“Congressional mandating of customer service standards in any industry represents a dangerous precedent,” the coalition said in a statement.
It would not be a constructive use of my time — or yours — to dissect each of these arguments. The BTC is certainly entitled to its opinion, even if a vast majority of air travelers probably disagree with it.
But here’s what puzzles me: If the BTC represents corporations that buy travel, and those companies at least theoretically should be concerned with their employees’ welfare, then how could BTC oppose rules that would make air travel a more customer-friendly experience?
I agree with the BTC on a lot of issues. This just isn’t one of them.
Christopher Elliott is the author of Scammed: How to Save Your Money and Find Better Service in a World of Schemes, Swindles, and Shady Deals. Critics have called it “eye-opening” and “inspiring” — it’ll “grab your attention and won’t let go.” Order your copy now on Amazon, Barnes & Noble or iTunes.

Elliott is consumer advocate
WHAT'S YOUR PROBLEM? If you're having trouble with a travel business - any business - and you've reached a dead end, maybe I can help. Send me an