Grandmother arrested after refusing to delete JetBlue fight video

August 14, 2008

Marilyn Parver filmed an altercation between two passengers on a recent JetBlue flight. When she refused to delete the footage from her video camera, she says the airline threatened to blacklist her and accused her of interfering with a flight crew, which is a federal crime.

You can read the account of Parver’s flight and subsequent arrest here. And look for Parver on ABC’s Good Morning America, along with the incriminating footage.

Parver contacted me yesterday to, as she put it, “get the word out.”

I am a 56-year-old grandmother who has never had so much as a speeding ticket. But on July 26th, I was taken by armed officers, in handcuffs, off JetBlue flight 195 for refusing to delete a video I had taken of a minor altercation between passengers over a screaming kid.

The flight crew made up a charge of interfering with the crew. My recording proves I did nothing wrong. I never even stood up. I was left with the threat that I will never be able to fly on JetBlue, that I will go on the no-fly list, and have a report written about me filed with the FAA.

I only refused to delete a legal short video. This is a complete misuse of power and what happened to me could happen to anyone.

I’m not a lawyer, but I can’t find any rules that would prohibit a paying passenger from filming the interior of a JetBlue aircraft or of any commercial plane. Parver said she phoned JetBlue later, and that a representative told her she could tape whatever she wanted.

My reading of the law — and again, I’m no expert — suggests the JetBlue flight crew overstepped its boundaries. In a big way.

I asked Parver if she would consider posting her footage to the Web so that we could see what the fuss was about. She said the JetBlue crew specifically told her they didn’t want the material posted on YouTube, which is why they were so insistent that she delete the videotape.

Instead, Parver is taking her case to ABC News, where its legal department can fend off any attack from JetBlue. I think that’s probably a smart move. YouTube might delete the footage, anyway.

This case underscores the travel industry’s sensitivity to the growing influence of social media, and particularly to viral videos. Makes me wonder how many other passengers have been asked to delete images that were not flattering to an airline.

✓ Get the latest travel news, tips and commentary from Elliott’s E-Mail, the subversive newsletter from industry gadfly Christopher Elliott. You’ll travel like a pro. Sign up here. It’s free.

Similar Posts:

114 comments

{ 7 trackbacks }

The Middle Seat Terminal : JetBlue Detains Passenger Who Shot Video in Plane
August 14, 2008 at 1:51 pm
Granny frog-marched off plane for refusing to delete video | News in brief
August 15, 2008 at 5:37 am
Online Travel Review » Passenger Detained by Police After Filming During JetBlue Flight
August 15, 2008 at 8:22 am
PeterGreenberg.com » Travel News Roundup, August 16, 2008
August 16, 2008 at 10:02 am
tripso.com | Breaking: Inspector Clouseau hired by TSA
August 22, 2008 at 4:38 am
www.buzzflash.net
August 23, 2008 at 1:33 pm
JetBlue wanted to censor « The Obambi.com Blog www.obambi.com
August 28, 2008 at 3:18 am

{ 107 comments… read them below or add one }

Larry Harrison June 23, 2009 at 5:09 pm

First-off, it is perfectly legal to film and photograph anyone in public, including children. Parents who oppose this have no legal footing. It’s called candid/street photography and it’s actually a legitimate art-form (although I doubt I’d call this “art”). I engage in it sometimes myself, parents need to lighten up–by the way, I’m a parent.

Second, I agree 100% that a flight should be free of the noise of a crying child. It is an extremely annoying sound and parents need to control it. Instead they too-often think it’s their God-given right to take 30-11 children on the plane with them and the disruption that occurs and the disrespect to other fliers that results from it–too bad. That is a wrong attitude. I can tell you, I’d never take my 2-year old on a plane with me unless she could behave–and if she didn’t, I’d take her to the bathroom and whip her hind-end good.

Third, kudos to the grandmother for refusing to delete the footage. She did nothing wrong and there is way too much of an anti-photography/filming sentiment going on these days.

Lisa S September 13, 2009 at 10:13 am

Thanks for letting us know about this incident, Chris. And thank you everyone for letting me know about how terrible JetBlue employees are.

Flight staff can make a flight miserable. In this case, flight staff allowed a child to impose upon other travelers for TWO HOURS by doing nothing, they then threatened and LIED to a passenger, and when the flight landed, they continued the harassment of Ms. Parver by LYING REPEATEDLY. I can’t imagine why a LVMPD officer decided to be verbally threatening and physically abusive in what was obviously a baseless claim by the flight attendants. Perhaps the officer was a friend or relation of one of the JB employees? It would be interesting to know.

I do know JB has lost my business. Flying is enough of a hassle without having to worry about threatening FAs. I hope that both JB and LVMPD face consequences for the actions of their employees and that the employees involved are all fired. I doubt that will happen, but I hope it does. And, I hope we hear about it because knowing that bullying individuals do experience negative consequences for their abusive actions would help people feel safer.

Melnik December 2, 2009 at 4:48 pm

No more JetBlue for me neither. Black list? Ha-ha! Oh, that’s treatening. Like there are no other airlines around. What if those employees would ask her to undress completely and she would refuse to do that? Interfering with the crew? Yeah, right! It’s just very stressful to go in courts and everything… And… the airline, of course, will have a good lawyer to fight. Good luck grandmother, we are with you!

namaste December 29, 2009 at 11:48 pm

Go Granny go! JB hasn’t given a damn about customers and it shows in many ways. This is just the latest example. namaste

John Adams January 1, 2010 at 1:24 pm

Supervisor to JetBlue Flight Attendants: Will this video increase the number of customers that fly with us? Help our profits (of lack of)? Will it show JetBlue in a positive light? If NOT then insist that they delete it. Threaten them with arrest if they refuse.

PrometheeFeu January 2, 2010 at 1:36 am

(Disclaimer: I am no legal expert) As I understand it, when you are on board an aircraft, the crew can basically do anything they want and if they ask you to do something you have to comply. (That’s more or less to allow the crew to keep order in the plane) So technically, I think there is a legal argument for the grandma being required by law to delete the video if the crew asked her to do so. Of course, in this case it flies in the face of the First Amendment and so we might see a constitutional ruling.

Bentor Tazenda January 10, 2010 at 5:16 pm

While this is not an American airline – We took some pictuers of ourselves and the EVA Air flight attendant was worried that we could not be all in the same picture together so she obliged and took a nice group picture.

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: