Idle hands are the Devil’s playground. While monitoring NASA’s site for the controversial air travel safety study, I couldn’t help but notice another survey that suggests the real safety hazard isn’t airlines, but airline passengers.
“Reports in the media and popular films frequently leave the impression that the main safety threats to commercial air carrier operations involve bombs, terrorist hijackings, and hazardous cargo,” the report on the Aviation Safety Reporting System (ASRS) section of NASA’s Web site declares. “Pilot and flight attendant reports to the ASRS indicate that passengers themselves are an unexpected source of many inflight safety problems, ranging from the merely annoying, to those that pose serious interference with crew duties and a potential risk to aircraft structural integrity.”
Before I continue, I should note that this is a decade-old report. But it offers interesting insights into how crewmembers felt back then — and probably still feel — about their carg … er, I mean, customers.
The survey found that a recent review of 73 database reports referencing inflight security problems revealed that passengers — “drunken, obstreperous, or dangerously uninformed” — constituted 23 percent of the reports submitted, equaling the number of incidents involving hazardous materials carried in the cargo hold. Among the most interesting ones:
» A “brazen passenger” retrieving his own bags from a commuter baggage compartment.
» An “apparently alcohol-impaired” passenger blocking an emergency exit.
» A passenger traveling with a chainsaw that began leaking during the flight.
» A deranged passenger who “tried to force open the main cabin door.”
» A sedated and inebriated passenger who “walking around the cabin with a wine bottle” and annoying his seat partner.
The NASA report concluded there was a “serious and growing problem with passenger inflight incidents.” They were right, of course. Only a few years later, the 9/11 hijackers crashed planes into skyscrapers, plunging the United States into a “war” on terrorism.
The question is, does the 2007 national survey of pilots suggest trouble ahead for air safety? And if NASA downplays the importance of the survey so that it doesn’t “hurt airline profits” is it really doing us any favors?
✓ Get the latest travel news, tips and commentary from Elliott’s E-Mail, the subversive newsletter from industry gadfly Christopher Elliott. You’ll travel like a pro. Sign up here. It’s free.
Sign up for my 
{ 1 comment… read it below or add one }
» A “brazen passenger” retrieving his own bags from a commuter baggage compartment.
Awwww, passenger could have hurt themselves and sued the airline. Altogether now – ahhhh. Seriously, if the passengers are kept away from the plane this would not have happened.
» An “apparently alcohol-impaired” passenger blocking an emergency exit.
Who let an “apparently alcohol-impaired’ passenger on the plane? If the passenger wasn’t “apparently alcohol-impaired” before they got on the plane, who served them enough alcohol for it to become a problem.
» A passenger traveling with a chainsaw that began leaking during the flight.
Who let a passenger carry a chainsaw as carry-on? Texas Chainsaw Massacre at 10,000ft anyone?
» A deranged passenger who “tried to force open the main cabin door.”
The flight attendant finally calmed the passenger down by saying “Mr President, we haven’t landed yet.”
» A sedated and inebriated passenger who “walking around the cabin with a wine bottle” and annoying his seat partner.
If the passenger was sedated how were they walking around inebriated? Again, who let them either get onboard inebriated, or let them drink enough to get that way.
I realise this study was completed many years ago but surely the fault isn’t always with the passengers. If flights continue to serve alcohol surely passengers will drink.