Now that the tarmac delay rule is “working as planned” should the government shorten the leash?

That’s a question a lot of airline observers may be asking themselves after today’s DOT report (PDF) that there was just one tarmac delay exceeding three hours in August 2010.

And look at this chart (above). What point is reporting this data to the flying public when there’s no meaningful data to report?

Elliott Advocacy is underwritten by Travel Leaders Group. Travel Leaders Group is transforming travel through its progressive approach toward each unique travel experience. Travel Leaders Group assists millions of travelers through its leisure, business and network travel operations under a variety of diversified divisions and brands including All Aboard Travel, Andrew Harper Travel, Colletts Travel, Corporate Travel Services, CruCon Cruise Outlet, Cruise Specialists, Nexion, Protravel International, SinglesCruise.com, Travel Leaders Corporate, Travel Leaders Network and Tzell Travel Group, and its merger with ALTOUR. With more than 7,000 agency locations and 52,000 travel advisors, Travel Leaders Group ranks as one of the industry’s largest retail travel agency companies.

The Transportation Department is doing a well-deserved victory lap on tarmac delays. In today’s news release, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood summed up his department’s reasons to celebrate:

These numbers show that the tarmac delay rule is protecting passengers from being trapped indefinitely aboard an airplane – with little or no increase in canceled flights.

Also, it shows that the hard work the airlines are putting into implementing the rule is paying off. With the summer travel season behind us, it appears that the rule is working as planned.


Now what?

Well, when I researched a story on tarmac delays a few weeks ago, Kevin Mitchell told me he saw no reason not to shorten the three-hour rule to two hours at some point. That’s an interesting idea.

Maybe that time is now.

At the very least, the government should start reporting two-hour tarmac delays in a meaningful way. The three-hour data is sort of irrelevant when there are only one or two flights a month that go over the limit.

Another area of interest: fines. If the rule is working as planned, shouldn’t the government be fining the airlines that go over the limit? Yet to the best of my knowledge, there have been no fines issued yet under the new three-hour rule.

What do you think? In a quick poll of more than 100 reader, most of you agree that two hours is better.