#Nophone day six and seven: Final thoughts on going phoneless

I spent most of yesterday touring United Airlines’ new corporate headquarters and meeting with customer service executives. I’ll have a full report soon. But in the meantime, here are a few final words about our #Nophone challenge, which ends today.

The big question we wanted to answer is this one: Can I travel without a phone in 2012?

Specifically, is it possible to go “data-only” — using Wi-Fi and cellular networks for Internet-based voice, video and text communications?

Elliott Advocacy is underwritten by MedjetAssist. Medjet is the premier global air-medical transport, travel security and crisis response membership program for travelers. With a MedjetAssist membership, if you become hospitalized more than 150 miles from home, we will get you from that unfamiliar hospital all the way home to the hospital you trust. All you ever pay is your membership fee. MedjetHorizon members add 24/7 personal security and crisis response benefits. Elliott.org readers enjoy discounted rates. Travel safer with  MedjetAssist.

The answer? No, not yet. Here’s why:

User habits. Old habits die hard. Even though it’s technically possible to make a phone call from an Internet-based service like Skype, it is still easier to use your regular phone to make a call. That’s at least what we found, even when as we tried to stay off our conventional lines.

Competing standards. Fact is, there’s no “one” standard for Internet-based communications, although there are several strong contenders. And until there is, I’ll have to keep several windows open on my laptop or iPad, to accommodate everyone’s preferences. That’s not a problem until I forget to fire up one app and no one can reach me. There must be a better way.

Price. This isn’t meant as a criticism — after all, everyone has a business to run — but it’s difficult to compete with free. So even though the best online communication tools cost something, it’s hard to compete with lesser applications that are free. I think some of the models out there need to be tweaked, although I’m not sure how.

Bandwidth. When I see those TV ads for 4G wireless service, I cringe. Wireless carriers are not the solution — they’re the problem. We already have the technology to facilitate smooth, super-high speed wireless communication, but commercial interest have stunted their adoption and deployment.

Walled gardens. I wrote about closed ecosystems in my latest book. These are not helpful to the next evolutionary step in wireless communication. Limiting the types of applications that can run on a smartphone because they aren’t in a cellular phone company’s commercial interests (but are in the interests of the user) limits progress and innovation.

By the way, join us tomorrow evening at 5 p.m. Eastern time under the #nophone hashtag for our party. We are not giving anything away (alas, the party favors never showed up, but so what?) but it’s gonna be a lively discussion about phones, family travel and a variety of other topics.

Ask us anything now under the #nophone hashtag, and we’ll answer it. Within reason.

%d bloggers like this: