|
What's
elliott?
About elliott
Contact us
t o p i c s
Business
Commentary
Destinations
Help
Leisure
Technology
Vault
Read
back issues. Like what you
see? Now you can become an underwriter.
a l s o
Referring sites
Public relations
Visit Tripso
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information,
call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail
to us.
|
|
Can't Have
it Both Ways
Power Trip · August 16, 2002
We've got it so
good.
Airfares are off about 40% since the government deregulated the airline
industry more than two decades ago, according to research by the likes
of Consumers Union and the National Center for Policy Analysis. The most
dramatic drop in prices happened in the last two years. Ticket prices
slid by 8.5% in 2001, to an average fare of $131, according to the Air
Transport Association. This year, they've plummeted another 12.3%.
So why do we feel so bad?
"There's been such a decline in service," says Matthew Bennett, who publishes
a newsletter called Firstclassflyer.com. "It's fallen in tandem with deregulation,
but in the last two years, it's really taken a hit. That's why business
travelers want to sit in the front of the cabin."
It could also be because until very recently, we didn't benefit from the
low fares. Early on, airlines figured out how to charge us up to four
times as much for the same seat as a leisure traveler, as I pointed out
in a recent column. Only recently have we started to take advantage of
the lower prices.
It's an odd feeling, getting what you want but not wanting what you got.
The whole idea behind deregulating the aviation industry was to increase
competition and to lower airfares. But now that prices are bottoming out,
many travelers are concluding that they don't like the result of deregulation.
As if we could somehow turn back the clock.
The decline of air travel
Flying on business used to be a pleasure. You've probably heard the stories
told by veteran frequent travelers about the comfortable seats, white
linens and friendly flight attendants that passengers came to expect on
each trip. Those aren't urban legends. I flew for the first time in 1969
and have had a front-row seat to the decline in fares and the demise of
service precipitated by the passage of the Airline Deregulation Act of
1978.
Flight attendants today indiscriminately expel us from flights for second-guessing
their absolute authority to rule the cabin. Innocent passengers such as
Akiko Mitsui, Pamela Batch Garza and John Kish — all kicked off their
flight for "crimes" that ranged from asking for a flight attendant's name
to allegedly bringing too much luggage on board — now think twice before
buying an airline ticket.
Is it any wonder that we have passengers prone to fits of air rage?
In a commentary for The Washington Post, I pointed out that only one major
airline managed to escape the hard times that have befallen the industry,
and wondered if it wasn't because they remembered a simple lesson: Air
travel is supposed to be fun. On Southwest Airlines, flight attendants
add comments like this to the safety instructions: "In event of a water
landing, please remember paddle, kick, kick, paddle, kick, all the way
back to shore." Pilots make announcements such as: "Weather at our destination
is 50 degrees with some broken clouds, but they'll try to have them fixed
before we arrive." Its current chairman, in fact, was once called "the
high priest of ha-ha."
Since the commentary was published, I've heard from travelers who agreed
that there's been a slow, steady decline in air travel. But they also
correctly pointed out that if Southwest had been more than a tiny regional
carrier in the 1970s, then it couldn't have competed with full-service
airlines on routes such as Baltimore-to-Los Angeles. After all, would
you rather eat peanuts while flying across the country in a tiny seat,
or get more personalized service, not to mention a real meal?
Time to adjust our attitude
We feel bad because we wanted the best of both worlds: low fares and high
service. We want to travel with the dignity and class of pre-deregulation
air travel while enjoying the low fares that allow us to crisscross the
country as if we were riding the subway. Maybe it's time for us to adjust
our attitude toward flying.
We can't have it both ways. Even Southwest understands that it's
unrealistic to expect low fares and high service levels. So when you complain
that air travel isn't as much fun anymore — and I agree that it isn't
— remember that in order for flying to return to its former glory, you'll
have to pay a lot more. Probably more than you're willing to.
The cut-rate trend must end. Airlines can't really cut their fares
anymore. As I write this, two carriers — US Airways and United Airlines
— are teetering on the verge of bankruptcy. One of the reasons they're
doing so poorly is that airfares have fallen to historic lows, and it's
just impossible to make any money. If ticket prices rise, could service
make a comeback? Don't count on it.
We have to adapt to the change. It is about as difficult to infuse
the surviving airlines with a sense of humor as it is to reverse the downward
spiral of airfares and service. We can't change; we have to adapt. That
means we must lower our expectations. It seems unlikely that the federal
government will ever re-regulate the airline industry — instead, it's
up to us to revise our expectations.
Many critics, such as University of Portland finance professor Richard
Gritta, believe deregulation didn't work. Gritta recently told me that
the federal government was too laissez faire, leaving the airline industry
to run itself into the ground. He's got a good point — a lot of things
went wrong when the government loosened the reins on the airline business.
But we got exactly what we wanted: cheap tickets.
It's the other consequences of airline deregulation — the reduced service
levels — we weren't prepared to live with. And now we have no choice.
We should have been more careful about what we asked for.
Christopher
Elliott is a travel commentator based in Key Largo, Fla. All e-mailed
questions may be edited, condensed or republished at the site's discretion.
|
|
|