|
What's
elliott?
About elliott
Contact us
t o p i c s
Business
Commentary
Destinations
Help
Leisure
Technology
Vault
Read
back issues. Like what you
see? Now you can become an underwriter.
a l s o
Referring sites
Public relations
Visit Tripso
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information,
call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail
to us.
|
|
Have We Learned
Nothing?
Opinion · June 6, 2002
So now airlines are
removing passengers for no reason other than that they look Middle Eastern.
That's the charge against four carriers made by the American Civil Liberties
Union in a lawsuit filed last week, a case that has unsettled, if not
surprised many travelers.
It's only human to be troubled by charges that these government-subsidized
businesses purged innocent passengers from flights after Sept. 11 because
of objections from other travelers or flight crews rather than legitimate
security concerns.
But surprise? Anyone
who believes that such behavior is impossible in a country of enlightened
and educated citizens is ignorant of our history - a sad legacy of discrimination
that extends far beyond the racial and ethnic stereotyping the airlines
now stand accused of.
Ending these abhorrent practices isn't as easy as winning a single lawsuit.
It's a matter of understanding that ejecting a passenger who looks different,
or dangerous, is a symptom of a more widespread ailment our society suffers
from: an endemic strain of xenophobia.
Just ask Hassan Sader, who was kicked off an American Airlines flight
last October after he boarded the aircraft. The Moroccan-born U.S. citizen
reportedly noticed a female passenger and a flight attendant talking and
looking in his direction. Minutes later, an airline agent asked him to
leave the plane. He was rebooked on another flight, issued a $10 meal
voucher but denied an explanation or apology.
Or talk to Arshad Chowdhury, who was taken off a Northwest Airlines flight
and denied passage on any of the carrier's flights even after being cleared
by the airport police, airline security officials and the FBI. His crime?
The pilot had found a "phonetic similarity" between Chowdhury's name and
someone on Northwest's watch list.
Similar stories are told by passengers on Continental Airlines and United
Airlines, two of the other carriers named in the ACLU lawsuit. Stories
of travelers with dark skin and foreign-sounding names being denied transportation
for no valid reason.
We've seen this before, in the internment of Japanese civilians during
World War II, in the hysteria of McCarthyist witch-hunts, and even in
the Jim Crow laws of the late 19th Century. We feared what was different
- whether it was racial, ethnic or ideological. We reacted inappropriately.
Ironically, history repeated itself only a day after the ACLU filed its
lawsuits. The Justice Department announced it would propose new regulations
to require tens of thousands of Muslim and Middle Eastern visa holders
to register with the government and be fingerprinted. The federal government
might as well have submitted a friend of the court brief supporting the
four airlines who removed the passengers of Middle Eastern descent from
their flights.
In a free society, we don't just have the luxury of public introspection.
We have an obligation to look at ourselves and ask: are our actions justified?
Is our policy reasonable? Or are we reacting now, as we have in the past,
in a way we'll later regret?
Our xenophobia is curable. But first we must want to be healed.
Christopher
Elliott is a travel commentator based in Key Largo, Fla. All e-mailed
questions may be edited, condensed or republished at the site's discretion.
|
|
|