|
What's
elliott?
About elliott
Contact us
t o p i c s
Business
Commentary
Destinations
Help
Leisure
Technology
Vault
Read
back issues. Like what you
see? Now you can become an underwriter.
a l s o
Referring sites
Public relations
Visit Tripso
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information,
call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail
to us.
|
|
Size Does
Matter
Opinion · June 21, 2002
Oversize airline
passengers, meet your dietician. Its name is Southwest Airlines. The no-frills
carrier last week began enforcing a rule that compels overweight customers
to buy a second ticket if they can't fit in the standard 18 3/4-inch-wide
seats.
As you might expect, every advocacy group from the International Size
Acceptance Association to the National Association for the Advancement
of Fat Acceptance is piling on the criticism. They say Southwest is discriminating
against portly passengers and are threatening to take the carrier to court.
Is Southwest guilty as charged? Yes, but in ways the defenders of the
obese never imagined. Southwest has always been obsessed with size. Ever
since the beginning. Persecuting the plump is a favorite corporate pastime
- and not just travelers. The airline also puts bloated competitors on
its hit list, the kind that fail to make money under the crushing weight
of high operating expenses.
Southwest flies only one kind of aircraft, the diminutive Boeing 737.
It's a small plane, with a capacity of about 140 passengers. Its seats
are small, offering only 32 inches of legroom. So is the plane's price
- about $40 million, or half the cost of a Boeing 757. While Southwest's
rivals amassed a fleet of planes from multiple manufacturers, the Dallas
airline stuck with just one plane made by one company. Cheaper to maintain,
cheaper to fix, it figured. The all-737 fleet is widely credited with
increasing Southwest's efficiency, which helped it make money.
Then there are the meals. Southwest doesn't serve real food on its planes.
Its flight attendants fling packages of peanuts at starving passengers
before offering them a beverage. Is the airline sending us a message?
Maybe it already knew that travelers would be better off eating a McDonald's
Big Mac, French fries and washing it all down with a strawberry milkshake,
since it's healthier than the average airline meal (a study by the Web
site eFit.com came to that conclusion). We should thank Southwest for
sparing us from such excess. Of course, its lack of in-flight cuisine
directly affects the airline's bottom line, which is good for business
too.
But the outraged travelers who must now pay extra for their tickets should
be grateful they're not one of Southwest's competitors. The airline wastes
no opportunity to pummel its pudgy rivals which are overburdened by the
weight of an inefficient route system, an impractical fare structure or
irrational labor costs. "When they zig," quips Southwest spokesman Ed
Stewart, "we zag." That's a nice way of saying it. During the reign of
Herb Kelleher, who is now the airline's chairman, the corporate brass
delighted in insulting its enormous competitors, hurtling epithets at
the airlines that were, for the most part, unprintable.
It's worth wondering if Southwest's fixation on size is a good thing.
Certainly the airline was taken aback by the public reaction to its decision
to begin enforcing its long-standing rule on large passengers. Two years
ago Continental Airlines contemplated a similar move. A manager leaked
the proposed decision to me and I published a story that said the airline
was thinking of charging big travelers more money for tickets. No sooner
had the article seen the light of print did Continental not only back
down; it also denied it had even considered such a policy change. Seems
the obese travelers carry a lot of weight.
But when it comes to operating a smaller, more nimble, competent airline,
Southwest might be on to something. The proof is in the profits - the
airline has made money for three consecutive decades, including last year,
when the industry lost an astounding $7 billion.
It might not be the politically correct thing to say, but apparently size
does matter.
Christopher
Elliott is a travel commentator based in Key Largo, Fla. All e-mailed
questions may be edited, condensed or republished at the site's discretion.
|
|
|