|
What's
elliott?
About elliott
Contact us
t o p i c s
Business
Commentary
Destinations
Help
Leisure
Technology
Vault
Read
back issues. Like what you
see? Now you can become an underwriter.
a l s o
Referring sites
Public relations
Visit Tripso
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information,
call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail
to us.
|
|
Airlines
Ignore Web Whines
The
Travel Critic · July
5, 1999
It is the season of discontent for
air travelers. Fares are soaring this summer, planes are flying at capacity
and airport terminals are crowded, hot and uncomfortable.
Passengers are furious. They're calling their representatives and demanding
new laws to keep them from being treated like cattle. They're writing
the Department of Transportation with their complaints. They're even e-mailing
me to vent about their last flight.
In response, Web sites are appearing to field travelers' gripes. Old online
veterans such as Untied.com, the ever-popular United Airlines-bashing
site, are being joined by a host of newcomers ranging from the slick PassengerRights.com
to the homegrown NorthworstAir.org.
The sites imply that participants who post their grievances will get quick
results - either because of a special arrangement the site has with an
airline or because the airlines will be shamed into action. But the statistics,
such as they are, don't support those claims. In fact, the new sites serve
mainly as a sounding board for disgruntled passengers and airline employees.
NorthworstAir.org, founded by Grand Blanc, Mich., inventor and entrepreneur
Ronald Riley, wastes no opportunity to pummel Northwest Airlines. "The
threshold of pain has to get to a certain point before Northwest will
do something about my site," says Riley. "Eventually, I'll punish them
enough so that they'll have to react."
Riley, who started the page this spring when Northwest refused to reimburse
him for a damaged laptop computer, says his efforts have already led to
the firing of at least one airline employee (his claims were impossible
to confirm). He doesn't know of any other disgruntled passengers who have
gotten results through his Web site, but thinks it's only a matter of
time until the airline will be cornered into resolving some of the complaints.
So will they? Unlikely, says Northwest spokesman Jon Austin. "Sites like
NorthworstAir.org aren't effective at all in resolving consumer complaints,"
Austin says.
"We don't monitor those sites. We don't react to information posted on
those sites. If someone has a legitimate gripe with us, the best thing
to do is to come to us directly."
A look at the best-established of the consumer airline sites, Untied.com,
suggests that he's right. Of 483 e-mailed complaints logged during a recent
three-month period, United Airlines answered only three. Jeremy Cooperstock,
an electrical and computer engineering professor at McGill University
who started the site after an unpleasant flight on the Chicago airline,
admits, "United isn't very good about responding."
Brian Swain, a Lynnwood, Wash., importer who launched his AirlinesSuck.com
this spring, says he's helped one user solve a problem, but like Riley,
he doesn't expect it to be his last.
"What we're really looking to do is create a place where passengers can
unite and have their complaints heard and resolved," he says. "The pilots
have a union, the airlines have a union, but the passengers don't have
a union. They don't speak with one voice."
Swain, who posted the page after a string of bad flights, intends to change
the status quo by recruiting subscribers and lobbying for improvements
in air travel. One of the best-orchestrated of the lot, PassengerRights.com,
is equally long on promises and short on results. Unlike the other consumer
sites on the Internet, PassengerRights.com isn't the product of one passenger's
disaffection. Rather, it is connected to Global Travel International,
a Maitland, Fla., operator of a home-based travel agency network.
Asked how many consumer complaints the site had resolved since its launch
earlier this year, spokeswoman Missy Ward could not furnish any specific
numbers.
"I can only say right now that out of all the people that have contacted
us, which is about 1,000, the majority of people have gotten responses,"
Ward says. "We're getting notes from people telling us that they've received
monetary settlements. And I've gotten a lot of e-mails to say thank you
for our help."
"Interactive Travel Report" editor David Kirby believes the new consumer
sites will continue to struggle because the Internet is viewed differently
by airlines.
An e-mailed complaint isn't taken as seriously as a fax or letter, he
points out.
"I think there's still too much of a temptation when you're on the Web
and you have this mailto link to just blather on and spew out complaints,"
he observes. "If I was going to complain, I would still try to compose
a nice intelligent, reasoned, detailed complaint letter and try to go
through the regular mail channels."
I wish Kirby were wrong, but I'm afraid he isn't. Firing off an electronic
tirade to an airline may feel good, but for now, you're not likely to
get much more than a form response followed by silence in reply.
Christopher
Elliott is a travel commentator and author of A
Bridge to Nowhere: A Year in the Florida Keys. All e-mailed questions
may be edited, condensed or republished at the site's discretion.
|
|
|