|
What's
elliott?
About elliott
Contact us
t o p i c s
Business
Commentary
Destinations
Help
Leisure
Technology
Vault
Read
back issues. Like what you
see? Now you can become an underwriter.
a l s o
Referring sites
Public relations
Visit Tripso
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information,
call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail
to us.
|
|
Annoying
Lists
The
Travel Critic · October
5, 1999
The other day someone asked what makes
me crabby. Lots of things tick me off, from the pitiful amount of personal
space in economy class to the extra charges that get tacked onto your
bill when you rent a car.
But if I had to narrow it down, I'd say it's the lists.
The travel industry is full of lists that do absolutely nothing except
confuse and mislead travelers. Hotel chains release lists of "top travel
destinations" in which every location, coincidentally, has one of their
properties. Cruise lines publish lists of "most popular ports of call"
- and they happen to conveniently serve all of them.
The Connecticut Office of Tourism, for example, recently released a list
of "Top Viewing Spots and Top Scenic Roads lists for Connecticut's Foliage
Season." Never mind that there aren't really any good spots this year
because of the drought that's been plaguing the Northeast. Topping the
chart is Haystack Mountain State Park, followed by Macedonia Brook State
Park and Mohawk State Forest. Nice places, I'm sure, but the state of
Connecticut and its tourism industry will benefit from the distribution
of the list in many ways, not the least of which is financially.
"Of course these lists are deceiving," says Ed Shaw, a veteran media consultant
in Lighthouse Point, Fla. As a former public relations executive in the
motion picture business, he remembers a common ploy for publicity: Issuing
a list of the Top 10 stars in Hollywood - "and six of them were clients
of mine, of course."
The travel industry is no different. Everyone from the most reputable
travel magazine to the lowliest supplier uses lists to lure "the average
schmuck into going to that destination or patronizing that advertiser,"
says Shaw. "There really ought to be more disclosure."
Indeed, there should be. Ann Waigand, who edits the "Educated Traveler,"
a bimonthly newsletter about special-interest travel, says lists that
mention advertisers or clients are an easy way of duping travelers, which
is why she offers an unusual disclaimer with her lists. "We even go so
far as to publish the advertising-supported pages in a different color
in the newsletter," she says.
By and large, however, the standards for these rankings range from so-so
to downright awful. Visit Florida, a public-private organization that
promotes Florida tourism, just released a list of "2000 Reasons to Visit
the Sunshine State." Great tie-in with the millennium there, but how did
it come up with the reasons?
"We had many sources, including brochures, guidebooks and other printed
material," explains spokesman Doug Luciani. "You didn't have to be a member
of Visit Florida, but many of the reasons do come from members."
Not everyone is as forthcoming. For years, the glossy travel magazines
have been publishing so-called "reader surveys" with the top destinations,
airlines and cruise lines. I can't help but wonder if when editors whittle
down the list of nominees, they sort out the advertisers from the non-advertisers.
The lower down the journalistic food chain you go, the worse it gets.
At most travel trade publications - widely read and believed by travel
agents - you usually don't stand a chance of making one of its lists unless
you're shelling out big advertising bucks.
So why am I so upset about lists? Perhaps Judy Rosenberg, a psychologist
in Beverly Hills, Calif., sums up my sentiments the best. "You've got
two things going on here," she says. "There's the lowering of resistance
through mass public opinion. And there's the influence of mass media and
advertisers on travelers. Combine the two together and what you come up
with is followers."
I'm skeptical of a magazine pretending to know what the top destinations
in the United States are. I think anyone who thinks they have a lock on
the best airlines is full of hot air, since strictly speaking, there are
no good airlines. But most of all, I wish they'd do us all a favor and
end the lists.
Enough, already.
Christopher
Elliott is a travel commentator and author of A
Bridge to Nowhere: A Year in the Florida Keys. All e-mailed questions
may be edited, condensed or republished at the site's discretion.
|
|
|