|
What's
elliott?
About elliott
Contact us
t o p i c s
Business
Commentary
Destinations
Help
Leisure
Technology
Vault
Read
back issues. Like what you
see? Now you can become an underwriter.
a l s o
Referring sites
Public relations
Visit Tripso
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information,
call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail
to us.
|
|
Gay
Travelers Rap United
The
Travel Critic · June
21, 1999
The news that his partner's father
was sick cut Court Passant's recent Palm Springs, Calif., trip short.
United Airlines booked the pair on the next flight back to Newark and
charged them $75 to change their tickets.
But when the New York television producer called United for a refund on
the fee, the carrier balked. "The representative explained that she could
only refund the service charge for a family member, but could not refund
my money since I was not related," he says.
Passant isn't related to his partner because he doesn't have the option
of marrying him. "I feel that the policy is anti-gay," he says.
United doesn't see it that way. It contends that it already offered Passant
and his partner a break on the return trip and that its decision to keep
the $75 fee is unrelated to his sexual orientation. But I was skeptical,
so I made a few inquiries.
"We are fairly flexible on this and tend to handle bereavement fares on
a case-by-case basis," says United spokesman Matt Triaca. He added that
sexual orientation and marital status aren't necessarily factors.
Nonetheless, there's a perception that the Chicago carrier is anti-gay.
In San Francisco, United Airlines is fighting a domestic partners ordinance
that would extend employment benefits to same-sex couples. I've even gotten
e-mails from United employees asking me to write about this subject.
United insists that its reluctance has to do with a local government trying
to regulate a national industry and isn't discriminatory.
But not everyone buys that. Members of San Francisco's board of supervisors
and gay rights advocates last year called for a nationwide boycott of
United Airlines. And this spring, an activist group called the Equal Benefits
Advocates began airing nationwide television ads supporting a boycott.
Billy Kolber-Stuart, editor of Out & About, a monthly newsletter for gay
and lesbian travelers, says the gay community is disappointed with the
way United is handling the same-sex benefits issue. His publication regularly
evaluates the carriers based on their policies toward homosexual travelers,
and he says "United is not free from discrimination."
Take the bereavement fare issue. "American Airlines specifically includes
same-sex partners in its bereavement fares policy," says Kolber-Stuart.
"United doesn't. And because of that, gay people are frequently denied
bereavement fares on United."
Question is, does United deserve a bad rap - and even a boycott? A look
at Out & About's airline scorecard suggests that there are other airlines
that are far more deserving of the "discriminatory" label. Only 3 of 12
major carriers surveyed earlier this year specifically offered bereavement
fares for domestic partners - American, Northwest and US Airways.
Although United was awarded the publication's "Rock Bottom" award last
year, it has made something of a turnaround in 1999, getting a "B" and
kind words from Out & About.
Still, Los Angeles antidiscrimination lawyer Bradley Gage says the airline
is on shaky legal ground, both in the way it treats employees and passengers.
"The law has been evolving to recognize couples, straight or gay, that
live together in a monogamous relationship in which they treat each other
as husband and wife. If one person's parent dies, the other one would
want to accompany them."
When it comes to bereavement fare policies, it's clear that United isn't
the worst offender. When it comes to extending benefits to same-sex partners
of employees, same thing. So if I were to nail an airline for being homophobic,
it wouldn't be United.
I think the carrier just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong
time and got caught up in an unfortunate legal spat.
Passant's problem highlights the fact that there's still a lot of progress
to be made throughout the airline industry in the way of policies toward
gays and lesbians.
Christopher
Elliott is a travel commentator and author of A
Bridge to Nowhere: A Year in the Florida Keys. All e-mailed questions
may be edited, condensed or republished at the site's discretion.
|
|
|