|
What's
elliott?
About elliott
Contact us
t o p i c s
Business
Commentary
Destinations
Help
Leisure
Technology
Vault
Read
back issues. Like what you
see? Now you can become an underwriter.
a l s o
Referring sites
Public relations
Visit Tripso
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information,
call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail
to us.
|
|
Creative
Delays
The
Travel Critic · March
16, 1998
Ever
board a flight that went nowhere? Maybe the plane just rolled out onto
the runway and then returned to the gate, or worse still, it never even
moved?
Happens all the time. Although neither the Department of Transportation
nor the Federal Aviation Administration collect statistics on mechanical
delays, experience tells us that roughly 5 percent of all scheduled flights
are hampered by some kind of "technical" trouble.
Just look at an airline's delay numbers, discount the weather, and you've
got a good idea of the kind of havoc mechanical problems can wreak on
a carrier's schedule.
None among us would be in favor of taking off with broken engines or flaps.
But is that usually what they're talking about when they tell us our flight
has been grounded because of mechanical trouble?
Often it's not. It seems carriers have begun adopting a very generous
definition of "mechanical" trouble. When an apologetic flight attendant
gets on the PA system and announces that you're stuck because the aircraft
is "experiencing mechanical problems," it might be that it's an aircraft
other than yours that's, in fact, having trouble. Or the problem might
not be the kind that you would think would ground a plane-a clogged toilet,
perhaps, or a button that's not illuminating. Airline insiders say carriers
have canceled flights for everything from a broken coffeemaker to wet
glue under the windshield to rather vague (read nonexistent) "engine irregularities."
"They call it mechanical trouble," says Frank Kogen, president and chief
operating officer for corporate travel agency Advanced Travel Management
in New York. "But it isn't. Not the way we think of it."
Well then, what is it? It could be a couple of things. According to Paul
Hudson, executive director of the Aviation Consumer Action Project, a
nonprofit consumer advocacy group based in Washington, D.C., "there's
an interest in exaggerating mechanical delays, because they're excluded
from on-time performance statistics kept by the FAA."
So if a plane is running late, just call it a mechanical delay and it
won't go on the airline's record. Heck, cancel the flight-it won't matter.
Airlines routinely ice underbooked flights for "mechanical" reasons and
send travelers out on a later flight. What the airline won't tell you
is that your plane works just fine. It's another aircraft-perhaps one
that's got more passengers on it-that's broken.
"It's a joke," admits an American Airlines crewmember, who will remain
nameless so she can keep her job. "We're telling passengers that the flight
is canceled because of a mechanical problem, but what we really should
be saying is that their plane is needed elsewhere."
If you're still a skeptic, I invite you to check out the "departures"
screen on your next layover in Denver or Atlanta. Try this on a day when
the weather is quiet and there are few passengers in the terminal. Saturdays
and Sundays are best. Now count the number of cancellations and ask yourself:
what are the odds of that many flights succumbing to mechanical trouble
at the same time?
On a layover in Dallas last week, with the weather clear as a bell, I
saw a whole column of cancellations. Unless there's a saboteur at work
at DFW, I figured this was prime example of airline cancellation greed.
Which airlines have a lot of dubious cancellations? Charters are the worst,
mostly because they only operate a limited number of aircraft. For them,
a "mechanical" problem can be something as insignificant as a stopped-up
toilet.
Not every airline pulls this stuff. Last year, after one of its flights
from New York to London broke down, British Airways offered to re-book
the stranded passengers. Only one traveler, who happened to be related
to a flight attendant, refused to go. He wasn't in any hurry, he said,
and would gladly take the flight once it was fixed. He ended up being
the lone passenger on the Boeing 747.
"It was a little embarrassing, to be honest, having only one passenger
on that flight," says British Airways spokeswoman Margie Vodopia. Her
carrier's rule is simple. It operates the flights whether they're overbooked
or underbooked. I like that policy.
Christopher
Elliott is a travel commentator and author of A
Bridge to Nowhere: A Year in the Florida Keys. All e-mailed questions
may be edited, condensed or republished at the site's discretion.
|
|
|