|
What's
elliott?
About elliott
Contact us
t o p i c s
Business
Commentary
Destinations
Help
Leisure
Technology
Vault
Read
back issues. Like what you
see? Now you can become an underwriter.
a l s o
Referring sites
Public relations
Visit Tripso
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information,
call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail
to us.
|
|
No
Booze? No Way!
The
Travel Critic · July
27, 1998
A rowdy crowd of mile-high imbibers
fired a barrage of angry messages in response to my column last week suggesting
that airlines lose the liquor service.
They called me everything from a modern-day prohibitionist to a Nazi.
Sober passengers, meanwhile, remained relatively quiet - and voted.
Of some 7,363 respondents to our Internet poll, 40 percent supported an
outright ban on alcohol. One-third thought carriers should limit in-flight
liquor service, while only 27 percent wanted to keep the cocktails coming.
I got some supportive e-mails, like this one from Dawson Springs, Ky.-based
traveler Martha Thomas: "The statistics back the fact that people and
liquor don't always go well together," she writes. "Keep the friendly
skies friendly-no liquor please."
Indeed, the pro-alcohol contingent was decidedly unfriendly.
"Ban, ban, ban," complains Eric Crossley,
a network analyst from Concord, Calif. (and one of the more well-mannered
e-mailers, by the way). "Where is the logic in punishing 75 percent of
flight takers because 25 percent are irresponsible? Alcohol doesn't cause
the problems; irresponsibility does."
"Gimme a break!" says Robert Proctor of Hartford, Conn. "Banning alcohol
on flights is another example of treating the symptom and ignoring the
cause, which here is a breakdown in social order and personal respect.
It penalizes the many travelers who want only to pass the miles in a relaxed
and convivial setting."
"Ban stupidity," chimes in another angry reader.
Yet another suggests: "Simply ban Christopher Elliott from all flights."
Fine by me. Like most readers of this column, I'd give anything to never
set foot on a plane again. I hate to fly. But that's about as likely to
happen as a total alcohol ban on flights, so I'll just dream on.
Some folks reacted to the horrific examples of in-flight hooliganism in
last week's column: an inebriated passenger brandishing a 3-inch blade;
a trashed traveler trying to toss a flight attendant out of an emergency
exit; and the guy who mistook a food cart for a toilet.
On a flight from Japan, Kevin Vance Carter of Vancouver, Wash., sat next
to a professional heavyweight boxer who had fought the previous evening
and "needed some wine" for his headache. Lots of wine, actually.
"Over the nine-hour flight, the attendants gave him 12 bottles of wine.
In the sixth hour of the flight, he became profane, ranting about police
authority in his hometown," Carter reports. "He was on the verge of physical
violence. The flight attendants evaporated, leaving me to deal with the
problem they created."
Atlanta Web developer Wendy Darling also felt uncomfortable on a recent
trip from London, when crew members kept offering her seatmate refills
on wine.
"He drank not one, not two, not three, but seven-possibly even eight-glasses
of wine," she remembers. "After he had accepted his third drink, I expected
that the flight attendants would stop offering it to him. In this case,
there were no problems, but I could easily imagine someone with a different
disposition being greatly affected by that amount of alcohol and causing
a disturbance."
Other readers reminded me that ridding the cabin of booze wouldn't work
because most passengers already board the plane intoxicated, having loaded
up at the airport bar.
"Banning alcohol on flights will not help anything unless you also ban
alcohol in airports," writes Jeff Burnside of Alexandria, Va. "People
oftentimes are drunk when they get on the plane."
Brian Bunn, a systems analyst from Tucson, Ariz., agrees. "I would say
these rowdy travelers did the majority of drinking in the airport terminal
waiting for their flights. If you ask me, banning in-flight drinking is
not the solution, but making airlines stick to their posted flight schedules
is. This would minimize the time a frustrated traveler would have to potentially
get into trouble."
I can't blame anyone for drinking in the airport, much less on a plane.
As Ernst Borchert IV, an engineer from Rock Hill, S.C., points out, flying
is rarely a pleasant experience these days. "I feel like a schoolkid on
the bus when I fly," he says.
No kidding: The food's awful, the service stinks, the seats are squished
together. If you're a nervous flier, you'd probably feel better after
a couple of drinks.
All good points. But, despite the persuasive e-mails, I stand by my original
recommendation. Drinking and flying don't go together. Making the cabin
dry is a small sacrifice that has the potential for big rewards-fewer
disruptions and altercations and, of course, healthier passengers.
Christopher
Elliott is a travel commentator and author of A
Bridge to Nowhere: A Year in the Florida Keys. All e-mailed questions
may be edited, condensed or republished at the site's discretion.
|
|
|