<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Two bills, one room &#8212; and zero options</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliott.org/the-troubleshooter/two-bills-one-room-and-zero-options/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-troubleshooter/two-bills-one-room-and-zero-options/</link>
	<description>Consumer advocate Christopher Elliott&#039;s site.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carver Farrow</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-troubleshooter/two-bills-one-room-and-zero-options/comment-page-1/#comment-14520</link>
		<dc:creator>Carver Farrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 14:21:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=5207#comment-14520</guid>
		<description>@Josh, Then you won&#039;t be staying at any hotels.  Hotels consider the guest to be ultimately responsible for the room that they occupy. They consider it a courtesy to bill third parties including your employer, the airline company that gave you a travel voucher, and even your credit card.  If they don&#039;t get paid they come after you.  When you check  in, you agree that you are ultimately responsible, and your signature is right next to the agreement.

Now, I agree that&#039;s billing months later, especially without contacting the guest, is bad form, but appears to be the industry norm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Josh, Then you won&#8217;t be staying at any hotels.  Hotels consider the guest to be ultimately responsible for the room that they occupy. They consider it a courtesy to bill third parties including your employer, the airline company that gave you a travel voucher, and even your credit card.  If they don&#8217;t get paid they come after you.  When you check  in, you agree that you are ultimately responsible, and your signature is right next to the agreement.</p>
<p>Now, I agree that&#8217;s billing months later, especially without contacting the guest, is bad form, but appears to be the industry norm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-troubleshooter/two-bills-one-room-and-zero-options/comment-page-1/#comment-14512</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 05:30:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=5207#comment-14512</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the hotel was very wrong here (possibly fraudulent).  I can see charging extra for a wrecked room, minibar, other charges, etc, but that should be within one day of checking out, if not at checkout.  The hotel has a responsibility and ability to balance its accounts.  There seems to be no possible justification for adding charges &quot;a few months later&quot;; that should be an immediate slam dunk charge reversal from the credit card company.  Either hotwire hadn&#039;t paid (and the hotel should have denied checkin in that case) or it had; the hotels bookkeeping backlog isn&#039;t the customer&#039;s issue.  I for one would avoid any hotel that did that...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the hotel was very wrong here (possibly fraudulent).  I can see charging extra for a wrecked room, minibar, other charges, etc, but that should be within one day of checking out, if not at checkout.  The hotel has a responsibility and ability to balance its accounts.  There seems to be no possible justification for adding charges &#8220;a few months later&#8221;; that should be an immediate slam dunk charge reversal from the credit card company.  Either hotwire hadn&#8217;t paid (and the hotel should have denied checkin in that case) or it had; the hotels bookkeeping backlog isn&#8217;t the customer&#8217;s issue.  I for one would avoid any hotel that did that&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

