What's the book corporate America doesn't want you to read? Find out now -- or you could get scammed.

An impossible connection in NYC

June 2, 2005

Q: I bought tickets through Travelocity to fly to from Richmond, Va., to Paris, in September.

But when I saw the itinerary, I noticed a problem. When I change planes in New York, I have to transfer from JFK to La Guardia. I only have two hours to do that, and Travelocity agrees that’s not enough time to deplane and collect my luggage, get a travel voucher, drive to the airport during rush hour and then check in and go through security.

The first two people I spoke with, a gentleman named Jonathan in the customer service department and someone named Eric in the reissue department, were polite when I explained my reason for requesting a change. But they told me I would have to pay $389.90 for a new ticket.

I asked to speak to a supervisor and was transferred to Pearl. She spoke to me as if I were an errant child, scolding me for not noticing the problem when I purchased the ticket. I was stunned and asked to speak to her supervisor. Pearl first told me that she was the only supervisor there. I asked again, and she said the supervisor was busy and would just tell me the same thing anyway. I persisted, and was put on hold.

Finally, I got through to someone named Susan. She explained that the itinerary I had selected was designed for people who travel overseas without luggage, and that this was a cheaper flight. She offered to waive $100 of the fee. After hanging up, I checked Travelocity and found that the earlier flight that I would like to be on was actually $75 cheaper than the $803 I had paid.

I appealed to Travelocity’s executive office, to no avail. I asked my local TV station’s consumer segment, 12 On Your Side, to intervene, but it couldn’t do anything, either. Can you help?

– Joyce Wells
Richmond, Va.

A: Travelocity is right – and wrong. You should have checked your itinerary at the time of booking. But at the same time, Travelocity shouldn’t have offered you that kind of itinerary in the first place.

I don’t buy the supervisor’s story that this impractical itinerary is for people who travel without luggage. The only kind of travelers who would go to Europe with only carry-ons are business travelers, and they would do anything to avoid a cross-town drive in bumper-to-bumper traffic.

So what’s going on here? I think Travelocity is trying to rationalize an itinerary its computer shouldn’t have generated. And its representatives weren’t very convincing.

You were correct to escalate your complaint to the next level, even though a representative insisted that there were no more supervisors to talk to. You took your case all the way to the top and in the end, you managed to reduce the cost of your ticket change by $100.

There are two things I think you should have done differently. One would have been to check your schedule before you clicked on the “book” button. Also, you should have considered using a human travel agent. No travel counselor on earth would have stuck you with that ticket.

Fortunately, Travelocity is in the middle of revamping its customer-service procedures. I’ve been assured by the company that it has taken steps to prevent the kind of service nightmare you experienced — particularly the unpleasant interaction you had with Pearl.

Travelocity agreed to change your ticket to a more reasonable itinerary at no charge.

Christopher Elliott is the author of Scammed: How to Save Your Money and Find Better Service in a World of Schemes, Swindles, and Shady Deals. Critics have called it “eye-opening” and “inspiring” — it’ll “grab your attention and won’t let go.” Order your copy now on Amazon, Barnes & Noble or iTunes.

4 comments

  • Art Johnson

    This time I side with the opposition (very rare!!) You should have checked your itinerary before purchase, plain and simple. Short connections are quite common on the on-line sites, and you have a responsibility to look at the itinerary (ever heard of buyer beware?). Perhaps you don’t fly much and don’t realize the short connection risk, but that is pretty much like claiming ignorance of the law. It don’t fly!!! Sorry, but no sympothy. I turn down lots of flights–of course the “cheap” ones–because of connection wrecks. Your responsibility–don’t blame someone else. Accept responsibility (politically incorrect, I realize, but accept it!).

  • http://aol barbie45

    I do sympathize with you; As Chris stated Travelocity is revamping its customer service procedures so they claim; glad Chris gave you some sound advice and got your refund back; I do wonder about the quality of the employees at the big three; when I read one employees comment on this blog about her company well what company does it right the first time.

  • Howard

    While it’s true that passengers should review their itins before purchasing but Travelocity does not help because all the details other than airline and flight start and end times are in smaller font size when you book the flight. If you are not working with a 20 inch monitor or selected a higher screen resolution than ideal for this website, those details are difficult at best to read. They also do not highlight anything unique for any flight and while they are kind enough to provide on-time accuracy details for those who are connecting, once again its done with a telephone book font that is difficult to read.

  • Steve

    “Short connections are quite common on the on-line sites, and you have a responsibility to look at the itinerary (ever heard of buyer beware?).”

    I think there’s an important distinction to be made between a short connection and an impossible one. Two hours to deplane, claim baggage, travel to another airport, recheck baggage, and get through security for an international flight sure sounds impossible to me.

    I would make the following comparison: if a travel website proposes a connecting flight that departs the same airport 30 minutes after my first flight is scheduled to arrive – sure, buyer beware. If the site proposes a connecting flight that departs 3 minutes after my first flight is scheduled to arrive, I’d say that’s their mistake and they should eat the cost of the necessary changes.

Previous post:

Next post: