What's the book corporate America doesn't want you to read? Find out now -- or you could get scammed.

An extra night at the Hyatt

June 28, 2006

Q: I recently stayed at the Hyatt Regency Chicago for two nights while in town for a trade convention. After my second night, I decided to extend my stay by one day because of weather conditions at my home airport, Minneapolis.

But when I checked with the hotel about staying, a hotel representative told me they were sold out. I was given a bill for two nights and made arrangements to check into another hotel.

Imagine my surprise when I received my credit card bill and saw that I was being charged for a third night at the Hyatt. It turns out that my travel agent had made a reservation for the third night without my knowledge. But the hotel employee didn’t tell me about it when I tried to extend my stay. Can they just arbitrarily charge you for additional nights, after they have given you your bill?

Arlis Miller, Mound, Minn.

A: Obviously, you should pay only for the number of nights you stayed at the Hyatt.

It sounds as if everyone was a little confused. I can only imagine the scene at the Hyatt on the morning you asked to extend your stay. It was probably chaotic with worsening weather conditions and the hotel running at 100 percent occupancy.

Under those circumstances, it’s possible that your reservations agent didn’t notice that your travel agent had already confirmed a third night. I seriously doubt that the Hyatt intended to dupe you into paying for an extra night. This is very unusual at a major chain hotel (but alas, not unheard of).

Here’s what you should have done. First, you should have phoned the hotel to discuss your problem. A quick review of its own records would have shown that you weren’t at the hotel a third night, and the Hyatt would probably have issued you a credit. You could also have appealed to someone on the corporate level (to find out how, go to Hyatt’s Web site, and click on “About Hyatt”).

There are at least three other levels of appeal: your credit card company, through which you could have filed a dispute; a small-claims court, which could have remedied this with a brief court appearance; and, of course, me.

I’m pretty sure Hyatt would have fixed this if you had gone to them first. But I checked with Hyatt on your behalf. A representative called you and apologized for the misunderstanding, credited you for the extra day and sent you a voucher for a free night’s stay at the Hyatt in Chicago.

Christopher Elliott is the author of Scammed: How to Save Your Money and Find Better Service in a World of Schemes, Swindles, and Shady Deals. Critics have called it “eye-opening” and “inspiring” — it’ll “grab your attention and won’t let go.” Order your copy now on Amazon, Barnes & Noble or iTunes.

5 comments

  • BritGalHere

    Why is the travel agent blameless in this?
    Why didn’t the travel agent alert the traveler to the already-booked third night?
    Traveler Arlis Miller needs to change travel agents.

  • Chris

    And why is the Hyatt at fault here? Assuming the second, separate reservation was guaranteed by a credit card (i.e. the hotel would have charged a night’s stay for a non-cancelled no-show), it’s entirely on Mr. Miller and his travel agent. As someone who used to work in customer service, I can say that it’s vary hard to match up two separate reservations to the same person unless the customer takes the initiative to mention it. The third night’s stay should be treated as a separate reservation, and the charges should be absorbed by the travel agent. The Hyatt should not have had to lose a night’s revenue on a room they could have rented out, and they certainly shouldn’t have issued a free night’s stay certificate. They were not at fault. Anything they did is purely a gesture of goodwill.

  • http://members.aol.com/ajaynejr/travel.htm Allan J.

    No it is not “on Mr. Miller and his travel agent”. Mr. Miller is entirely out of the loop.

    Instead it is “on the hotel and the travel agent”. Even after 6 PM the hotel should have a “window” where the reservation will be held with no penalty until the traveler can be contacted for confirmation. It is not the traveler’s responsibility to possess a cell phone. The window does not have to be large. Should the window pass and the traveler is not suceeded in being contacted, the reservation is simply cancelled.

    Yes I am a computer geek but I still maintatin that while hardly any of us do not work with computers, the hotel is not totally blameless when it works with numbers rather than names and as a result the traveler who actually had a reservation is turned away. Crossing in the mail is part of the cost of doing business, not a traveler beware, and in this case it resulted in an empty room for a night.

    There is nothing wrong with issuing a certificate “for insult” if not to improve customer relations.

  • Carol

    Chris, Does the Innkeepers law come into effect in this situation?

    If Arlis was already a guest at the hotel and informed the hotel she would be staying another night, the hotel must allow her to stay (according to the law). They can’t “put her out in the cold”. They are forced to allow her to stay.

    I would like to know if this is a national law and one which innkeepers would rather we not know about?

  • http://www.modarehberim.com/ Moda

    Thanks for charing.
    This is really nice blog :)

Previous post:

Next post: