Too good to be true? 4 times you should just say ‘no’ to a deal

April 17, 2010

If you found a bargain airfare, you’d book it, right?

But what if you knew the price was a mistake? Would you still do it?

In an era of too-good-to-be-true prices, gimmicky discounts and even an occasional zero fare, travelers have to make that call every day.

Sometimes they get it right. Sometimes not.

Last fall, for example, British Airways accidentally offered a $40 base fare from North America to India. After taxes and fees were added, the total came to around $500 — still a deal, but not an obvious error to the untrained eye. Thousands of people booked tickets in a two-hour period.

When British Airways refused to honor the price, many inexperienced air travelers were outraged. They pointed out that if the tables were turned — if they had made a mistake on their ticket — that the airline would keep their money.

But a smaller subset of travelers spotted the $40 base fares and knew they were a mistake, but booked anyway, believing they could force British Airways to accept the purchase. Was that wrong?

William Sannwald, a lecturer at San Diego State University, says both a company and its customers have an obligation to determine if an offer is accurate. “With all the unethical things taking place in business today,” he says, “I think that customers need to be vigilant in any transaction.” And flexible, too. “We all make mistakes, and a reasonable person should understand this,” he added.

I’ve been thinking about what separates a frugal traveler from a thief, and although the experts I spoke to seem to agree on the big issues (you know, stealing is wrong) there’s no unanimity when it comes to finer points of pricing snafus. By way of full disclosure, I thought the travelers who bought tickets knowing the fare was foul were morally challenged. In a blog comment, I referred to them as “bottom feeders,” which may have been a little harsh. I probably just should have called them criminals.

When do you say “no” to a deal?

When it’s too good to be true
Everyone knows when something just doesn’t feel right. And if you’ve been around long enough, you also know when it probably isn’t — either there’s a catch or it’s a bait-and-switch or it’s a legitimate error.

“If it appears to be too good to be true,” says Charles Green, the chief executive of Trusted Advisor Associates, a business consulting firm in West Orange, N.J., “then it’s very possibly not true.” The gut-check is important. It can save you from making a small mistake, like buying an erroneous fare, to investing in a fraudulent travel club or timeshare.

If you know it’s a mistake
Virtually all of the experts I spoke with for this story told me that knowingly booking an erroneous fare is wrong. The argument that airlines wouldn’t be as understanding if the roles were reversed made no difference to them.

But what if you don’t know? Jonathan Burgstone, an adjunct professor at the University of California’s Center for Entrepreneurship & Technology, says that’s different. “If the customer is genuinely unaware of the mistake, then he or she could reasonably accept the transaction,” he says. “A reasonable-minded person can generally assume that an advertised price is correct.” (British Airways offered a $300 voucher off a future flight, incidentally.)

If the company is wishy-washy
Obviously, having to wade through pages of fine print on a “bargain” can be such a turn-off that you would want to walk away. But if you see a terrific offer and make inquiries, and the answers are less than satisfactory, perhaps you shouldn’t be making reservations.

“Check with the airline or with a travel agent,” advises Joseph Pastore, a professor at Pace University’s business school. Only if you have a clear and satisfactory answer should you assume the offer is legit. (In the British Airways case, travelers were initially told the offer was good, but it was over a weekend, when key decision-makers weren’t available).

If it’s a dramatically lower price than anyone else is offering
Ever heard of the saying, “You get what you pay for”? When it comes to pricing errors, that may be particularly true. A price that’s far lower than those of competitors can be assumed to be either wrong or defective (or both).

“To manage your risk, you might buy another reasonable fare,” says Rick Brenner, a consultant with the management consulting firm Chaco Canyon Consulting in Cambridge, Mass. If you want to hedge your bets, and are planning hotel reservations, consider booking a more expensive, refundable ticket — just in case. “When the offerer discovers its error, take the compensation and consider it your winnings,” he says. “This won’t always work, but I do believe it’s your best shot.”

I put the question to the ethicists: How should a British Airways scenario — or one like it — have played itself out? “The ethical thing to do is to flag the error,” says Shel Horowitz, an expert on marketing ethics.

“Good common sense should prevail” after that, says Mark Zupan, dean of University of Rochester’s business school. Which is to say that if an airline sells thousands of fares at $40, or even $500, it could present a financial hardship.

“Mistakes like this do get made and bearing the consequences of one’s mistakes is part of the process which one takes to pay better attention in the future,” he told me. “Where a firm’s ongoing viability is threatened by a mistake however, then it’s best for the company to fess up and find a way to make amends.” Zupan says the $300 offer was acceptable, given the circumstance.

On the question of whether a travel company should honor an incorrect price, there was some agreement among the professionals. Michael McGrath, author of the book “Decide Better! For a Better Life,” says a pricing error shouldn’t put a company out of business. “Decisions like this need to be made with consideration of what is ethical and what is a good customer practice, offset by the financial impact,” he told me.

But there’s a significant disconnect between the rhetoric and the reality. I asked Stephen Martin, a professor at the University of Denver’s business school, to poll his students about what they would have done if offered an erroneous fare. Although 90 percent believed buying an erroneous fare was unethical, a majority said they’d do it anyway.

“They felt like the airlines always take advantage of them,” Martin says.

At the same time, an equal percentage said they believed British Airways had missed an opportunity to make things right with its customers. “Most felt that $300 credit was a weak response and only intended to get more revenue,” he added.

In other words, we can talk about ethics until the cows come home. But once we’re on a plane, many of us jettison our values right out the cabin door.

(Photo: caribb/Flickr Creative Commons)

  • David Z

    “They felt like the airlines always take advantage of them,” Martin says.

    Well, the airlines can always argue people always take advantage of whatever lower fare they offer. Even to the point they’re hardly making money, just because others are seemingly able to afford to do so for seemingly the same thing.

    All’s fair in love and war…

  • Lisa S

    In an age where some companies offer free flights and then tack on tons of charges that add up to a considerable amount, eg a $40 flight that ends up costing $500, there is no way for a customer to know with 100% certainty that a mistake has occurred on a company’s website. The first time I saw a £0.00 fare, I thought the company had made a mistake and I chose a flight that had a fare attached to it. Stupid me, I paid £12.00 plus taxes extra for my ignorance. The airline didn’t offer me a refund when I later learned that if you book early enough, the flight is free but the taxes and fees cost you £75.00. Here in the States we are seeing Spirit Airlines start to implement the same pricing strategy that has been used by some European airlines for years. Please tell me how a consumer, even an experienced travel consumer, is supposed to know that a company made an error on its website and it NOT simply offering a new pricing strategy or simply trying to fill planes? Perhaps if airlines didn’t charge extra for people to call them and make a reservation over the phone such problems could be avoided!!!

  • mark leventhal

    I think the statement you made, “They pointed out that if the tables were turned — if they had made a mistake on their ticket — that the airline would keep their money” is the key to the anger.
    I think they should have considered what would have happened if the shoe was on the other foot.
    Your quote, ” Good common sense should prevail” after that, says Mark Zupan, dean of University of Rochester’s business school”, but the airlines don’t consider that when a customer makes a mistake. . Would have British Airways allowed a passenger to get out of a reservation that was an obvious mistake on the part of the customer?
    I think the answer is no . .therefor British Airways should have honored the paid reservation..

  • http://travelinggiraffe.blogspot.com Crissy

    I’ll have to agree that it’s hard to tell what’s a mistake and what’s a gimick to sell tickets. I was buying tickets to Hawaii last year and in a 3 days the price dropped $300. I’m certainly not a frequent flyer, but I do travel 2-4 times a year so I’m not a novice either. I don’t think I would notice a mistake fare if said it was a mistake.

    Having said that, if I saw one and thought, that can’t be right. I might book it and take my chances. But if the airline called and said it was invalid I would accept some deal they were offering – either cancel the flight or pay a higher amount. I wouldn’t demand they give me the flight for the price if I legitmately thought it might be wrong.

    Having said that, how do we know what someone is really thinking? Aside from them saying it. But with the way pricing is done these days thinking a price was unusually low and possibly wrong could happen everyday, that doesn’t mean every low price is a mistake and that we shouldn’t purchase a suspiciously low price. Though we should be looking for the fine print and other charges we will have to pay.

  • Bill

    First of all, I think both passenger and airline should behave in an ethical way. If any business, including an airline, makes a mistake, it is in no one’s interest to see them go out of business because of it. Since the passenger should have no expectation of an outrageously low fare, it should not be a life or death situation for them if it is not honored.

    Airlines generally do let you “get out” of things. I made a mistake a few months ago on Expedia booking a Continental flight. I phoned and agent and they voided it.

    Another time, a couple of years ago, I made another mistake..which cost a couple of hundred dollars on an airline website. I chose to take the loss in that case.

    The thing everyone has to realize is that people make mistakes, whether they are passengers or airlines – and when they do make mistakes, there has to be a “reasonable” way out of it.

    Be reasonable and fair in all of your dealings is a good motto.

  • Laura

    BA should have honored the price, it was listed and the trasnactions had been completed. You don’t go to Wal-Mart, buy a box of cereal for $1 and have them call you days later to say the item was mis-marked and it was actually $4 so you need to pay the difference if you want to keep the cereal. (Outlandish though that comparison may be stick in any other industry/commodity and you’ll see how ridiculous the airlines are).

    Our family of 3 makes 3-4 trips from Houston to Cincinnati every year. Usually tickets are priced between $250-450 but on occassion I’ve found them lower – once even at $95. Now I know it was very low for that route BUT it was what was listed I had no trouble with that trip. I think if ticket pricing was more understandable to the passenger then there is a legitimate claim to customers taking advantage. But when fares for the exact same itinerary can vary hour by hour, day to day by hundreds of dollars its no wonder these passengers thought they had just stumbled upon the rock bottom price and booked immediatly.

    Also as stated above the airline would charge me to change a typo in my name, or to make a reservation over the phone as in yesterdays article regarding United. Airlines really need to start ‘doing unto others as they would have done to them’. They really need to become more reasonable with their handling of customers if they expect us to be reasonable with them.

  • http://rjtalestold.blogspot.com Dick Jordan

    The response that the University of Denver students made when asked about this issue is telling: The corporate world has created the impression (true or not) that it will, on every possible occasion, steal with impunity from its customers, in the process forgetting the “do unto others” tenet of The Golden Rule. The best way for any business, including airlines, to do business is, on very possible occasion, to act as though the “Customer Is Always Right” even when the customer is fall-out wrong. Goodwill used to be an asset valued on the books of a business. What’s it worth today? The airline industry seems to have its head in the clouds, or stuck in the sand, and assumes it can blithely fly along forever while disregarding this most principled of principals of doing business.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    In the US, if a retailer put the wrong price sticker on an item, put the wrong price placard in front of an item, put the price tag in front of a display, etc., they are obligated to honor the price.

    In Arizona, if you are overcharged for an item at a local grocery chain, they will give you the item for free (if you have more than one item, the first item is only free).

    Giving the ‘crazy’ pricing structure of the airlines today, how could a passenger knew if the fare was incorrect given that there are airlines with $ 10 fares with a long list of fees and taxes?

    In regards to British Airways (BA), they should honor the pricing error. Maybe they should change their processes by adding another level of checking (eyes, software or both) on their fares before posting them on their website to reduce or eliminate that these pricing errors in the future. If BA overcharged their passengers with an incorrect error, will they give back the money to their customers? I doubt it.

    A few years ago, I had a sales rep that didn’t follow our company processes when pricing a system. He generated a price proposal which he left out several items resulting in a price for a system that was 50% lower than the actual price ($ 50,000 instead of $ 100,000). We honored the incorrect price, made no profits on the project and addressed the issue with the sales rep. We are a publicly-traded company so our integrity is important to us.

    BA won’t have gone out of business due to this pricing error. BA would have gain favorable goodwill if they honor the pricing error. Instead, BA elected another route of if we made a pricing mistake which we undercharge you, we are not going to honor it but if we overcharge you, we won’t give back your money. If it is okay for BA not to honor a pricing mistake, how about BA waiving the fee to change a reservation if a passenger made a mistake in the booking of their reservation?

  • Brian C

    I think this boils down to what defines a “reasonable” consumer, and I don’t think there’s a good definition.
    A reasonable consumer might look for the best price, see something that is rock bottom and try booking knowing it may be a bait-and-switch tactic, or that there may be only 1 seat available at that price for that date. The reasonable consumer in this case is trying to hold on to as much of their money as possible.

    A reasonable consumer may also be one that acts in accordance with the mainstream. This is impossible to gauge, because people booking online have no idea that hundreds of people also booked that flight. However, the fact that many many people booked these flights opens the door that this is something a reasonable consumer would do.

    What’s too good to be true? Is half off a netbook computer with mail-in rebate too good to be true? Is a flat screen TV (1 per store) for $200 on Black Friday too good to be true? Are free samples at the grocery store too good to be true? I think the reasonable consumer may conclude that low base fares with over $400 in fees might reasonably be a marketing gimmick.

    What happened at BA seems to be a systems error where an erroneous price somehow made it through whatever checks there were. When a system is at fault, the wrong response is to blame the participants in the system (customers, as the end user, are participants in the system). Instead you write it off as the cost of doing business, and concentrate on fixing the system that allowed this to happen.

  • Louise

    Long ago, in a better world. The New York Times ran an ad for B. Altman, one of New York’s premier department stores, offering bicycles for one dollar. It was the newspaper’s error. Altman’s, at the direction of Mr.Altman himself, sold the bicycles for one dollar. This is known as HONOR. And that’s one of the reasons people actually cried when Altman’s was destroyed by a rapacious takeover crook.

  • MVFlyer

    What’s the root cause of this problem? Some programmer sitting in a bunker someplace underneath Heathrow forgot to put an extra zero at the end of the fare? BA’s very complex algorithm to calculate fares (constantly changing dependent upon load, competition, fuel prices, sun spots and the cost of mangoes in Thailand) doesn’t have something that’s taught in Programming 101: an error trap? Putting in an error trap would be an incredibly simple way of preventing this type of thing from happening in the future.

    But does this mean the consumer, who sees a price and buys it, is the ‘criminal’? It’s not the consumer who made the mistake, it was the airline-and the airline needs to take responsibility. And while I agree with the point that if the transactions would *seriously* impact the health of the company, then they must back off, otherwise, honor it and live and learn (and prevent!!!!)

  • MVFlyer

    One other thing–in some ways, the airlines have created this monster themselves…BA notwithstanding (generally respected), the overall airline industry has a reputation that’s just slightly above the tobacco companies. Most of the lines in the US and many in Europe and elsewhere, treat the customer with moderate to intense disdain. So why should the customers give the airlines a break? You reap what you sow.

  • Kevin

    What about these airlines that offer $1.00 fairs? Or “Penny” fairs as promotions or specials? A $40.00 fair could easily be one of those fairs. How is an average consumer to know? Should we pass up the $1.00 or ‘Penny’ fairs because they are too cheap and must not be ‘real’ fairs meanwhile they all sell out while we try to confirm if it is legit or not? In this case some customers called BA confirmed the fair and booked it. I think BA should have honored the fair and been more careful in the future.

  • Justin

    Consider this point though. If you go to a store and they mispriced an item, they still have to honor it. One should not place the burden on the consumer. Matter of fact, if you and I sign a contract, we are held liable for it. Why should their mistake be any different. It seems the rules ONLY apply if those who do not make them are on the receiving end a lot of times….

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    If the price of an airfare was $ 100 from “I have never head of this airline before” then I think you must question the fare. However, if the fare for a flight or the rate for a hotel room came from a major player such as British Airways, United, US Airways, Hilton, Marriott, etc, I think that most people won’t question the fare or room rate of being incorrect but a special or marketing promotion.

  • Carver

    @Arizona

    That’s not exactly true. Stores are not generally required to honor a mistaken price. Of course many will and local laws differ, but no, a retailer is generally not required to honor such a price.

    I’ve been roasted for this before, but I stand by my assertion. As per Chris’ article: “Virtually all of the experts I spoke with for this story told me that knowingly booking an erroneous fare is wrong” And I believe that is correct.

    Of course some will claim that the customer never knows. This is BS.

    Of course, the vendor may choose to honor the price for goodwill or other business decision as Arizona’s company did. But that’s a different story.

  • Jim_J

    Delta Airlines used to have a low-cost subsidiary called Delta Express. For those who don’t remember it, Delta Express was created to compete with Southwest and other discount carriers. Back in 2002, I was traveling from Tampa to Boston every few weeks to visit my mother who was in a nursing home there. I had an alert set up on my Yahoo start-up page that would show the lowest round trip fare in this market. One spring day, just after noon, I looked at the alert and it said $80 for the r/t. Could that be right? The normal fare on Delta Express was over $200 and when they ran a sale, you might catch $175. The $80 fare was good from mid-June through Labor Day weekend. Holidays were not blacked out

    I thought about whether this fare was too good to be true and quickly decided that it may be but I would book the seats anyway. Should Delta claim that they had made an error, I would either pay the additional fare or book flights with another carrier. I booked three round trips for both my wife and myself including dates for the 4th of July weekend and Labor Day.

    After several days, I realized that Delta had not made a mistake. The fare was still available on their web site. Certainly, if there was an error, they would have caught it and removed the bargain fare from the site.

    I saved several hundred dollars by acting quickly. My advice if one sees a fare on a legitimate airline that looks too good to be true is to book it quickly and wait to see what happens next.

  • Jake

    “In the British Airways case, travelers were initially told the offer was good, but it was over a weekend, when key decision-makers weren’t available.”

    Given that the company itself was stating that the prices were valid, they should have been held to their word. The fact that key decision makers weren’t available was irrelevant. If they are they key, and the employees at the company had reason to believe there was an issue, they should have been disturbed on the weekend. If the employees did not have a reason to believe there was an issue, then quite frankly neither should consumers. It’s not MY job to make sure that companies are doing THEIRS correctly.

  • Arizona Road Warrior

    @ Carver – “That’s not exactly true. Stores are not generally required to honor a mistaken price…”
    - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – -
    A retail stores that has a flyer or ad in the Sunday edition of the local newspaper will generally have a disclosure such as “Not responsible for typographical errors” (Fry’s Electronics); “Not responsible for printing and typographical errors” (Office Max); “Best Buy is not responsible for typographical or pricing errors in this ad” (Best Buy).

    If it was a typographical error, stores won’t honor the price. Typically, when there is a typographical error, the store will put something by the product stating that the ad had a typographical error. However, if you went into a store and the item had a price sticker of $50 or there is a price tag on the shelf for $ 50 or placard with the price $ 50 in front of a display, the store is going to honor that price or be in violation of the Uniform Deceptive Trade Practices Act (There is a federal DTPA that covers all 50 states and there are state DTPAs where some states have added more regulations to the federal DTPA).

    When I was in college, I remember reading a case where an automobile dealership was running radio ads (this was in the 70s) stating that you can buy a brand new car for 10,000 bananas. A person came to the dealership with 10,000 bananas. The case went to court and the customer won.

    In regards to British Airways (or other travel providers), they do not have a disclosure on their website stating that they are not responsible for typographical errors in fares. If they had that disclosure on their website then I will support BA in their decision of not honoring the fare error.

    One could agrue that this could be ‘bait & switch’…airlines could put low fares on their websites to get business then turn around to say that the fare was an error and for some additional money, we can give you a seat on the flight. Airlines will become like car dealerships that used to advertised a car for $ 15,000 but the car was gone when a customer arrived at the dealership before they were regulated to disclose how cars on their lot at this price and etc.

    I could be wrong but if I remember right, BA didn’t want to give full ‘cash’ refunds back to the customer…they wanted to give them credit vouchers for future flights if they elected not to paid additional money for their flights.

    @ Carver – “As per Chris’ article: “Virtually all of the experts I spoke with for this story told me that knowingly booking an erroneous fare is wrong” And I believe that is correct.”
    - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - — – -
    Most of the people that Chris quoted in the article were academia. I don’t recalling him quoting any lawyers, FTC regulations (in the case of US based companies), DTPA regulations (in the case of US based companeis) and/or court cases in the article.

    @ Carver – “Of course some will claim that the customer never knows. This is BS.”
    - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - – - — – -
    There are airlines such as Spirit Airlines that sell tickets for $1. I have seen Southwest Airlines’ ad on TV promoting $ 99 fares to fly acorss the US. There are hotels and airlines that will have promotions from time to time with super low prices.

    These college professors talked about the ethics of the consumers. How about the ethics of these companies? If a customer made a mistake on an airline website, it is ‘screw you with the $ 150 change fee’. If the airline made a mistake, it is still ‘screw you.’ The consumers are not selling tickets here but you are expecting the consumers to know the correct pricing from an airline.

  • barbie45

    ArizonaWar Warrior, Thank you for giving a concrete example of your company attitude, Also besides being beautiful Arizona has and is enacting some positive legislation.
    Carver you are correct in the typographical statement in newapapers although it is very tiny.Chris you are very harsh in calling those who booked the BA flight criminals. By the way who are these so-called experts you refer to.

  • Steve

    Here’s my opinion: if the airlines are going to continue to insist that customers be made to pay for “fat-finger” mistakes, they shouldn’t be surprised that customers are going to want to take advantage of their errors. When a customer accidentally does a double transaction, or mistypes a name and wants it corrected (and it’s clearly an honest mistake, not an attempt to transfer the ticket to someone else), the airlines fight tooth and nail to keep the money or at least charge an exorbitant fee to fix the problem. But at the same time, they want to be able to say “oops, we made a mistake, we don’t have to honor the advertised fare” when it happens to them? Ridiculous.

    As for the statement that people should know when a fare is too good to be true, I’d argue that with the wide variations in ticket pricing it’s next to impossible to know that. People have posted here about finding flights for $29 each way, or cross-country flights for around $100. Clearly, those weren’t mistakes, or they wouldn’t have been able to take those flights. At what point does a flight become “too good to be true”?

  • Carver

    @Arizona

    A couple thoughts…

    Stores honoring misprints is more about goodwill than any legal issues. I checked the law (admittedly just skimmed) that you cite and this situation is not covered. A misprint is not an intent not to sell a product at the advertised price.

    Banana case

    We’d need to know more details to be useful. But remember the Pepsi Jetfighter case. I believe they lost and that’s in the 90s.

    Bait and switch

    That’s a red herring. If BA purposely tried to mislead people then BA would be SOL. I believe most of us are going with the working hypothesis that these are honest errors. Purposeful misdirection is a completely different issue

    Experts in Academia

    Actually the experts are adjunct professiors and lecturers. At most elite schools that means that these guys are only in Academa part time. They have regular private sector jobs. If they were full time academics they’d have the rank of assistant professor or higher.

    As far as quoting attorneys, Chris can quote me. I am a practicing attorney for over 10 years litigatin business cases. Taking advantage of an error is unethical. There, a practicing lawyer stated it.

    Pricing errors

    I’ve made more than my fair share of travel mistakes in the past 20 years of traveling. To date, I have been held for one missed cancellation penalty by one hotel. I’ve had airlines waiver change fees and other fees. And I assume that others have done as well. So we know that there is flexibility.

    Ethics

    As you mother told you, two wrongs…

    Just because some companies act unethically is hardly a license to stoop to similar behaviour.

  • y_p_w

    I’ve gotten some pretty good deals in my day. I don’t travel that often, so I guess my BS meter may not be that fine-tuned.

    I do remember booking a $30 one-way (14-day advance) fare within California specials on Southwest after the Sept 11 attacks. That may have been an extraordinary price, but not one that seemed all that unusual given how much airlines were hurting to put warm bodies on their planes.

    Heck – I once even booked a RT fare between Oakland and OC on Alaska (I don’t think they fly that route any more) for $52 including all taxes and fees. I quizzed a few of my other passengers, who said they paid between $150-200 RT. I remember playing around with the outbound and return flight times, and the key to getting that cheap far was booking a 6:05 AM outbound departure. If I pushed that to any of the mid-morning or afternoon flights, it got bumped up to $150+. I seemed to have a lot of flexibility to book return flights for the same $52 fare. I know it seemed really good, but I didn’t question it, and the fare was easily honored.

  • Robert

    BA should honor the fare. Every airline has a computer system that could be programmed to flag such changes and not allow them to be posted. The fact that BA either can’t be bothered or is too incompetent to program it’s computers properly isn’t the travelling public’s problem.

Previous post:

Next post: