<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New rule: 3 travel policies that should be revived</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/</link>
	<description>Consumer advocate Christopher Elliott&#039;s site.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paula</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-20083</link>
		<dc:creator>Paula</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 15:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-20083</guid>
		<description>I think they should reinstate a (minimum) one hour grace period for car rental return.  With all the other fees and surcharges on rental cars, renters are being bombarded with extras.  One hour &#039;s grace is not too much to ask!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they should reinstate a (minimum) one hour grace period for car rental return.  With all the other fees and surcharges on rental cars, renters are being bombarded with extras.  One hour &#8216;s grace is not too much to ask!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tripso.com &#124; Missed your flight? Your airline may help &#8212; if you know what to ask for</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-20037</link>
		<dc:creator>tripso.com &#124; Missed your flight? Your airline may help &#8212; if you know what to ask for</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 11:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-20037</guid>
		<description>[...] you&#8217;re delayed on your way to the airport because of a summer thunderstorm, you might think you&#8217;re out of luck. Most airlines now gladly charge you a full walk-up fare for the next flight when you don&#8217;t [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you&#8217;re delayed on your way to the airport because of a summer thunderstorm, you might think you&#8217;re out of luck. Most airlines now gladly charge you a full walk-up fare for the next flight when you don&#8217;t [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer (the other one)</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-19825</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer (the other one)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 02:32:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-19825</guid>
		<description>If she arrived more than 2 hours in advance, and still missed the flight due to the long lines, she can&#039;t have been the only one - more than half the passengers would have missed that flight.  The one time this happened to me (due to the airline&#039;s computer system crashing), they ended up holding the flight for several hours in order to allow everyone to check in.  While that was a problem for those with connections, if they&#039;d insisted on taking off on time, 2/3 of the passengers would have been left behind through no fault of their own.  Holding the flight is the only reasonable thing to do in that situation - it seems strange that they didn&#039;t do that here.  Something about this story doesn&#039;t add up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If she arrived more than 2 hours in advance, and still missed the flight due to the long lines, she can&#8217;t have been the only one &#8211; more than half the passengers would have missed that flight.  The one time this happened to me (due to the airline&#8217;s computer system crashing), they ended up holding the flight for several hours in order to allow everyone to check in.  While that was a problem for those with connections, if they&#8217;d insisted on taking off on time, 2/3 of the passengers would have been left behind through no fault of their own.  Holding the flight is the only reasonable thing to do in that situation &#8211; it seems strange that they didn&#8217;t do that here.  Something about this story doesn&#8217;t add up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sevenseat</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-19821</link>
		<dc:creator>Sevenseat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 18:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-19821</guid>
		<description>Jasper has exposed a bigger problem that bringing back Rule 240 may help address. The airlines feel like they have sold you a seat on a specific flight, not transportation from point A to point B. This is very similar to going to a baseball game, if it gets rained out, you may get a seat for another later game, but not the next available game. I think the flying public, especially leisure travelers, feel like flying should be like taking a number at the deli. If I have number 2 and someone else has number 182, they may get to go first because their plane is at the gate while mine is stuck in Syracuse. The problem has become worse and worse as airlines have cut capacity and switched mainline jets for regional carrier props. The hub and spoke system has made it so even large airports are dominated by single carriers.

Just try to invoke a Rule 240 in Newark when your flight to Rochester is canceled. There are no other carriers for them to put you on. You are better off renting a car.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jasper has exposed a bigger problem that bringing back Rule 240 may help address. The airlines feel like they have sold you a seat on a specific flight, not transportation from point A to point B. This is very similar to going to a baseball game, if it gets rained out, you may get a seat for another later game, but not the next available game. I think the flying public, especially leisure travelers, feel like flying should be like taking a number at the deli. If I have number 2 and someone else has number 182, they may get to go first because their plane is at the gate while mine is stuck in Syracuse. The problem has become worse and worse as airlines have cut capacity and switched mainline jets for regional carrier props. The hub and spoke system has made it so even large airports are dominated by single carriers.</p>
<p>Just try to invoke a Rule 240 in Newark when your flight to Rochester is canceled. There are no other carriers for them to put you on. You are better off renting a car.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasper</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-19819</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 17:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-19819</guid>
		<description>I think the flat tire rule and car rental grace period were thrown out of the window by customers themselves. Not all, but those gaming the system. How often have we got up real early to catch an early flight, only to stand in line forever waiting for &#039;late&#039; folks for a flight just a bit earlier. I have literally been laughed in my face by such idiots. &quot;I don&#039;t get up on time, I&#039;m a red carpet member hahaha&quot;.

I agree with Josh thought that the flat tire rule doesn&#039;t apply in Fumiko&#039;s case. The air line was at fault, not the customer.

As for rule 240, that should come back immediately. Even if air lines have to pay each other, things should equal out, if they just use empty seats to get people around. 

However, I think that they dropped the rule, because bean counters have been able to define the product that the airline sells narrower and narrower. As a customer, you want to buy transportation from A to B. That&#039;s it. Preferably, you&#039;d like to indicate when you leave and return, but as a customer you understand you depend on the air lines&#039; flight schedule, so you accept some inconvenience. As a customer you&#039;re also willing to accept some delays, as long as you have the feeling that an air line it trying to get you where you need to be.

Air lines however, have reduced the product to the sale of a specific seat on a specific flight, at a specific point in time, with a specifically defined luggage allowance, a fluid quota and a little responsibility for any hick-ups that they legally can get away with.

The gap between the two is what people get angry and frustrated about. Basically, customers can not buy the product they want anymore, while airlines keep telling customers that that&#039;s really not the product they want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the flat tire rule and car rental grace period were thrown out of the window by customers themselves. Not all, but those gaming the system. How often have we got up real early to catch an early flight, only to stand in line forever waiting for &#8216;late&#8217; folks for a flight just a bit earlier. I have literally been laughed in my face by such idiots. &#8220;I don&#8217;t get up on time, I&#8217;m a red carpet member hahaha&#8221;.</p>
<p>I agree with Josh thought that the flat tire rule doesn&#8217;t apply in Fumiko&#8217;s case. The air line was at fault, not the customer.</p>
<p>As for rule 240, that should come back immediately. Even if air lines have to pay each other, things should equal out, if they just use empty seats to get people around. </p>
<p>However, I think that they dropped the rule, because bean counters have been able to define the product that the airline sells narrower and narrower. As a customer, you want to buy transportation from A to B. That&#8217;s it. Preferably, you&#8217;d like to indicate when you leave and return, but as a customer you understand you depend on the air lines&#8217; flight schedule, so you accept some inconvenience. As a customer you&#8217;re also willing to accept some delays, as long as you have the feeling that an air line it trying to get you where you need to be.</p>
<p>Air lines however, have reduced the product to the sale of a specific seat on a specific flight, at a specific point in time, with a specifically defined luggage allowance, a fluid quota and a little responsibility for any hick-ups that they legally can get away with.</p>
<p>The gap between the two is what people get angry and frustrated about. Basically, customers can not buy the product they want anymore, while airlines keep telling customers that that&#8217;s really not the product they want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-19813</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-19813</guid>
		<description>I believe Josh (especially in his second post) has hit this on the head.  Provided I arrive at the airport and am engaged in the check-in process according to the guidelines that the airline and TSA provide for that airport and time of day/week, it is reasonable to expect that a failure to make my flight is no longer my responsibility--someone (presumably the airline) should accommodate me at their expense.  While there are plenty of unexpected things that can happen that are technically &quot;out of your control&quot; that keep you from getting to the airport, I&#039;m not sure that it is reasonable to ask the airline to step to the plate in those circumstances. So, as Josh says, let&#039;s make a deal:  Give me a time to show up--if I show up by then and miss my flight, that&#039;s on you.  If I don&#039;t, it&#039;s on me.  How does it get any more fair than that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe Josh (especially in his second post) has hit this on the head.  Provided I arrive at the airport and am engaged in the check-in process according to the guidelines that the airline and TSA provide for that airport and time of day/week, it is reasonable to expect that a failure to make my flight is no longer my responsibility&#8211;someone (presumably the airline) should accommodate me at their expense.  While there are plenty of unexpected things that can happen that are technically &#8220;out of your control&#8221; that keep you from getting to the airport, I&#8217;m not sure that it is reasonable to ask the airline to step to the plate in those circumstances. So, as Josh says, let&#8217;s make a deal:  Give me a time to show up&#8211;if I show up by then and miss my flight, that&#8217;s on you.  If I don&#8217;t, it&#8217;s on me.  How does it get any more fair than that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sevenseat</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-19812</link>
		<dc:creator>Sevenseat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 15:32:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-19812</guid>
		<description>I have see a lot of comments about how Ms. Seguchi should have done something different, but it seems she followed the rules and still got shafted.

First of all, even domestic segments of international itineraries are considered international and you have to show your passport when checking in, I just experienced that a couple of weeks ago. I could not check in online, even for the 45 minute flight to Newark. Online check in is often not available for international flights, or you can only check in so far, and then still have to stand in line to show your passport to a person before you can get a boarding pass. I only fly internationally three or four times a year, and this seems to be different every time. The one nice part of this rule is that the international rules on compensation for lost baggage apply to even the domestic segments. 

This case is completely American&#039;s fault for not having enough staff to check in the flight, especially since they know how many people are on that flight, how many have printed out boarding passes early, and how many are or are not US citizens. There is no way we as travelers can know how long the lines are going to be at an airport, especially a strange airport, so we follow the guidelines that the airlines have given us and show up two hours early. Should we now show up three, four, five hours early just in case American didn&#039;t feel like paying some employees and is understaffed? While she should have spoken up, or been on the phone to American&#039;s customer service from the line, this is entirely American&#039;s fault.

Now, for the rental car question. If I rent a movie and they tell me that it has to be back by noon or I get charged for an extra day, I have it back by noon or I pay for the extra day. This is much more within the control of the customer than the airline issue.

Ah, rule 240. There seems to be a lot of nostalgia for it, but that era seems to have gone the way of white wall tires and native English speaking call center operators. I would be happy with having one set of rules to follow for all airlines, but that too is probably wishful thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have see a lot of comments about how Ms. Seguchi should have done something different, but it seems she followed the rules and still got shafted.</p>
<p>First of all, even domestic segments of international itineraries are considered international and you have to show your passport when checking in, I just experienced that a couple of weeks ago. I could not check in online, even for the 45 minute flight to Newark. Online check in is often not available for international flights, or you can only check in so far, and then still have to stand in line to show your passport to a person before you can get a boarding pass. I only fly internationally three or four times a year, and this seems to be different every time. The one nice part of this rule is that the international rules on compensation for lost baggage apply to even the domestic segments. </p>
<p>This case is completely American&#8217;s fault for not having enough staff to check in the flight, especially since they know how many people are on that flight, how many have printed out boarding passes early, and how many are or are not US citizens. There is no way we as travelers can know how long the lines are going to be at an airport, especially a strange airport, so we follow the guidelines that the airlines have given us and show up two hours early. Should we now show up three, four, five hours early just in case American didn&#8217;t feel like paying some employees and is understaffed? While she should have spoken up, or been on the phone to American&#8217;s customer service from the line, this is entirely American&#8217;s fault.</p>
<p>Now, for the rental car question. If I rent a movie and they tell me that it has to be back by noon or I get charged for an extra day, I have it back by noon or I pay for the extra day. This is much more within the control of the customer than the airline issue.</p>
<p>Ah, rule 240. There seems to be a lot of nostalgia for it, but that era seems to have gone the way of white wall tires and native English speaking call center operators. I would be happy with having one set of rules to follow for all airlines, but that too is probably wishful thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicky</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-19790</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-19790</guid>
		<description>Or, if at ALL possible, check in online the night before and print your boarding passes! I don&#039;t know if this is possible on international flights such as Ms. Seguchi&#039;s, but it&#039;s worth trying to find the business center of a hotel or a local library to try to do this, if you can. That way, you go straight through to security. I think this even works if you have bags to check. It&#039;s worth it to pay even $10 for the privilege of printing out boarding passes to avoid the check-in lines. 

However, airlines and rental companies should certainly have a little wiggle room built into their rules. Some things are completely beyond a passenger&#039;s control. Ms. Seguchi was at the airport on time, doing what she was supposed to do. AA took shameful advantage of her and should have allowed her to go ahead and check in. 

P.S. If online check in won&#039;t work and the airline provides the little e-kiosks, USE THEM! If you don&#039;t have changes to make to your ticket, you&#039;ll still get through in about a third of the time versus standing in line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, if at ALL possible, check in online the night before and print your boarding passes! I don&#8217;t know if this is possible on international flights such as Ms. Seguchi&#8217;s, but it&#8217;s worth trying to find the business center of a hotel or a local library to try to do this, if you can. That way, you go straight through to security. I think this even works if you have bags to check. It&#8217;s worth it to pay even $10 for the privilege of printing out boarding passes to avoid the check-in lines. </p>
<p>However, airlines and rental companies should certainly have a little wiggle room built into their rules. Some things are completely beyond a passenger&#8217;s control. Ms. Seguchi was at the airport on time, doing what she was supposed to do. AA took shameful advantage of her and should have allowed her to go ahead and check in. </p>
<p>P.S. If online check in won&#8217;t work and the airline provides the little e-kiosks, USE THEM! If you don&#8217;t have changes to make to your ticket, you&#8217;ll still get through in about a third of the time versus standing in line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve Rabin</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-19769</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve Rabin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:17:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-19769</guid>
		<description>In response to Carrie:

It wasn&#039;t an int&#039;l flight--flying from Orlando on AA would be domestic to Chicago or Dallas or somewhere else.  She did exactly what she was supposed to do.  This one was AA&#039;s screw-up.  They should have let her jump the line.

I&#039;m a regular United passenger, and at busy times at airports like SFO, the agents often ask &quot;is anyone going to such-and-such city&quot; when the time grows near and moving those folks forward (or opening an another line if possible).  This is the way it should be--it&#039;s just good business.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to Carrie:</p>
<p>It wasn&#8217;t an int&#8217;l flight&#8211;flying from Orlando on AA would be domestic to Chicago or Dallas or somewhere else.  She did exactly what she was supposed to do.  This one was AA&#8217;s screw-up.  They should have let her jump the line.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a regular United passenger, and at busy times at airports like SFO, the agents often ask &#8220;is anyone going to such-and-such city&#8221; when the time grows near and moving those folks forward (or opening an another line if possible).  This is the way it should be&#8211;it&#8217;s just good business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-19724</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 17:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-19724</guid>
		<description>&quot;Too bad his flight wasn’t on Southwest.&quot; His flight to Amsterdam? Really? Last time I checked, Southwest didn&#039;t fly to Europe. Maybe it&#039;s too bad that in order to fly internationally, we are forced to choose a carrier that couldn&#039;t care less about its passengers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Too bad his flight wasn’t on Southwest.&#8221; His flight to Amsterdam? Really? Last time I checked, Southwest didn&#8217;t fly to Europe. Maybe it&#8217;s too bad that in order to fly internationally, we are forced to choose a carrier that couldn&#8217;t care less about its passengers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-19713</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 16:34:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-19713</guid>
		<description>My daughter missed her connection in Madrid going to Sevilla and was stuck in the airport for 12 hours.  When I called to request that she be re-scheduled to give her enough time on the return flight they said only 1.5 hours is required and wanted a $200 fee.  They also wanted specifics on why she had missed the flight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My daughter missed her connection in Madrid going to Sevilla and was stuck in the airport for 12 hours.  When I called to request that she be re-scheduled to give her enough time on the return flight they said only 1.5 hours is required and wanted a $200 fee.  They also wanted specifics on why she had missed the flight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mort B</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-19690</link>
		<dc:creator>Mort B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 18:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-19690</guid>
		<description>RegularGuy is dead wrong on this one.  American Airlines should have moved Ms. Seguchi to the head of the line when she requested it so as not to miss her flight, or else they should have delayed the departure of her flight until all passengers who were there had been checked-in.  AA is entirely to blame in this situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RegularGuy is dead wrong on this one.  American Airlines should have moved Ms. Seguchi to the head of the line when she requested it so as not to miss her flight, or else they should have delayed the departure of her flight until all passengers who were there had been checked-in.  AA is entirely to blame in this situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travel-Writers-Exchange.com</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-19687</link>
		<dc:creator>Travel-Writers-Exchange.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 17:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-19687</guid>
		<description>Wow!  And the TRUTH is finally revealed.  I had no idea about the &quot;240 Rule or the Flat Tire Rule.&quot;  All these rules just to travel.  Nice!  Who knew that the Flat Tire Rule was dropped after 9/11?  It makes sense because people were paranoid about flying.  FYI:  you may want to arrive 2 1/2 - 3 hours for an international flight.  Yeah, it sucks but if you want to make you&#039;re flight -- do it!

Running gas is a driver&#039;s fault...if you&#039;re going towards empty, find a gas station.  It&#039;s a shame that responsible travelers are punished because of their fellow travelers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  And the TRUTH is finally revealed.  I had no idea about the &#8220;240 Rule or the Flat Tire Rule.&#8221;  All these rules just to travel.  Nice!  Who knew that the Flat Tire Rule was dropped after 9/11?  It makes sense because people were paranoid about flying.  FYI:  you may want to arrive 2 1/2 &#8211; 3 hours for an international flight.  Yeah, it sucks but if you want to make you&#8217;re flight &#8212; do it!</p>
<p>Running gas is a driver&#8217;s fault&#8230;if you&#8217;re going towards empty, find a gas station.  It&#8217;s a shame that responsible travelers are punished because of their fellow travelers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-19683</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 15:56:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-19683</guid>
		<description>Re: Regularguy

I agree about running out of gas -- that is generally the driver&#039;s fault (that&#039;s one reason I never take the &quot;purchase the tank&quot; rental option; it&#039;s too tempting to try to return completely empty).  Although again, we give the airline some leeway for delayed/cancelled/misconnecting flights, so I think a little low-cost-to-them accomodation is appropriate.

But checkin lines?  Of course everyone knows there will be a line, but *how long* varies greatly -- Most of the time, there&#039;s no more than 5-10 minutes delay at many airports; how exactly am I supposed to know that they&#039;re short-staffed on a particular day and it&#039;ll be 3 hours?  Am I supposed to show up 6 hours early, just in case?  Just pick a time and let people build that into their schedules (and if airline A says be there 3 hours early, and B says 2 hours early, people can build that into their price/convenience shopping).

The airline completely controls the throughput of those lines -- the number of agents and how efficient each checkin is (remember the old days when even a standard checkin on a paper ticket resulted in 2-3 minutes of furious typing?  That&#039;s gotten a bit better now, but sometimes you get stuck behind others with weird problems)

Just tell me when to show up at the airport and I&#039;ll be there (and take responsibility for anything up to then); after that IMHO it&#039;s the airline&#039;s job to get me where I&#039;m going...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: Regularguy</p>
<p>I agree about running out of gas &#8212; that is generally the driver&#8217;s fault (that&#8217;s one reason I never take the &#8220;purchase the tank&#8221; rental option; it&#8217;s too tempting to try to return completely empty).  Although again, we give the airline some leeway for delayed/cancelled/misconnecting flights, so I think a little low-cost-to-them accomodation is appropriate.</p>
<p>But checkin lines?  Of course everyone knows there will be a line, but *how long* varies greatly &#8212; Most of the time, there&#8217;s no more than 5-10 minutes delay at many airports; how exactly am I supposed to know that they&#8217;re short-staffed on a particular day and it&#8217;ll be 3 hours?  Am I supposed to show up 6 hours early, just in case?  Just pick a time and let people build that into their schedules (and if airline A says be there 3 hours early, and B says 2 hours early, people can build that into their price/convenience shopping).</p>
<p>The airline completely controls the throughput of those lines &#8212; the number of agents and how efficient each checkin is (remember the old days when even a standard checkin on a paper ticket resulted in 2-3 minutes of furious typing?  That&#8217;s gotten a bit better now, but sometimes you get stuck behind others with weird problems)</p>
<p>Just tell me when to show up at the airport and I&#8217;ll be there (and take responsibility for anything up to then); after that IMHO it&#8217;s the airline&#8217;s job to get me where I&#8217;m going&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RegularGuy</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/new-rule-3-travel-policies-that-should-be-revived/comment-page-1/#comment-19674</link>
		<dc:creator>RegularGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 16:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=6510#comment-19674</guid>
		<description>How is running out of gas a circumstance &quot;completely beyond [one&#039;s] control?&quot;  Most cars these days have this nifty little gadget that lets the driver know exactly how much gas he has left in his tank.  

&quot;couldn’t have anticipated the long check-in lines at the airport&quot;  -- really?  Has she not been in an airport recently?  ever?  Again .. NOT beyond her control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How is running out of gas a circumstance &#8220;completely beyond [one's] control?&#8221;  Most cars these days have this nifty little gadget that lets the driver know exactly how much gas he has left in his tank.  </p>
<p>&#8220;couldn’t have anticipated the long check-in lines at the airport&#8221;  &#8212; really?  Has she not been in an airport recently?  ever?  Again .. NOT beyond her control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

