<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Good airline fees? Some are worth the money</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/</link>
	<description>Consumer advocate Christopher Elliott&#039;s site.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: “Airlines continue to insult my intelligence” &#124; Slinking Toward Retirement</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-57719</link>
		<dc:creator>“Airlines continue to insult my intelligence” &#124; Slinking Toward Retirement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2010 03:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-57719</guid>
		<description>[...] more to this story, and in order to tell it, I have to rewind to an earlier column about good airline fees and bad airline [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more to this story, and in order to tell it, I have to rewind to an earlier column about good airline fees and bad airline [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: “Airlines continue to insult my intelligence”</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-57457</link>
		<dc:creator>“Airlines continue to insult my intelligence”</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-57457</guid>
		<description>[...] more to this story, and in order to tell it, I have to rewind to an earlier column about good airline fees and bad airline [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more to this story, and in order to tell it, I have to rewind to an earlier column about good airline fees and bad airline [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of MJ on Travel: Ancillary Revenue - Marshall Jackson on Travel</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-51519</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of MJ on Travel: Ancillary Revenue - Marshall Jackson on Travel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 02:24:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-51519</guid>
		<description>[...] in unanimous agreement with Chris Elliott&#8217;s take on the airlines.  That said, I think his piece on the airlines&#8217; hunt for ancillary revenue is close to spot on.  Except at the end where the word &#8220;re-regulation&#8221; appears, which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in unanimous agreement with Chris Elliott&#8217;s take on the airlines.  That said, I think his piece on the airlines&#8217; hunt for ancillary revenue is close to spot on.  Except at the end where the word &#8220;re-regulation&#8221; appears, which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: This Week in Travel #51 &#8211; Chris Elliott Strikes Back &#124; The Amateur Traveler Travel Podcast - best places to travel</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-46705</link>
		<dc:creator>This Week in Travel #51 &#8211; Chris Elliott Strikes Back &#124; The Amateur Traveler Travel Podcast - best places to travel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 16:33:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-46705</guid>
		<description>[...] Good airline fees? Some are worth the money [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Good airline fees? Some are worth the money [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Best of MJ on Travel: Check Out This Take on Ancillary Revenue - Marshall Jackson on Travel</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-43341</link>
		<dc:creator>Best of MJ on Travel: Check Out This Take on Ancillary Revenue - Marshall Jackson on Travel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 14:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-43341</guid>
		<description>[...] in unanimous agreement with Chris Elliott&#8217;s take on the airlines.  That said, I think his piece on the airlines&#8217; hunt for ancillary revenue is close to spot on.  Except at the end where the word &#8220;re-regulation&#8221; appears, which [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in unanimous agreement with Chris Elliott&#8217;s take on the airlines.  That said, I think his piece on the airlines&#8217; hunt for ancillary revenue is close to spot on.  Except at the end where the word &#8220;re-regulation&#8221; appears, which [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moof</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-34718</link>
		<dc:creator>Moof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-34718</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve seen my share of strange fees - my personal bugbear is being levied a &quot;Fuel surcharge&quot; - something I&#039;ve seen TUI airlines do before - as it makes their fares seem cheaper on price comparison sites. I am booking transport from A to B - surely the fuel should come included?

I&#039;ve had european airlines play on my fears by trying to charge me &quot;cancellation insurance&quot; - by European law, airlines are required to refund or exchange any flight cancellations, and feed me or put me up in a hotel if the flight is delayed beyond a certain number of hours. (Air Europa, I&#039;m looking at you)

I don&#039;t know if the European rules regarding liquids and gels are that dissimilar to the TSA ones, but I don&#039;t mind paying extra for checking bags in on what are basically commuter flights. The mere existence of these charges makes people less likely to check luggage in, and so having to handle the luggage is more costly per passanger now. However, I do object to ludicrous excess weight fees, and I find some airlines&#039; idea that you can pay for extra bags, but that doesn&#039;t allow for extra weight quite unfair (easyJet, I&#039;m looking at you) - similarly, using non-standard measurments for allowable hand luggage in the hope that people will be forced to check cabin-sized bags in for extra fees downright insulting (Ryanair, I&#039;m looking at you).

Whilst others seem to be happy to pay for extra legroom, as a tall man, I&#039;m in two minds. I think of it as discrimination - and whilst I can vaguely accept it from so-called &quot;low cost&quot; airlines, I find it despicable that big traditional airlines such as Iberia are now decreasing seat pitch to whatever the minimum allowable is. Especially, as you cannot necessarily reserve these seats online, the class separator moves around enough that sometimes (on some airbusses with emergency exits at row 9 or 10) you&#039;re unsure even of which class to get to find a wide legroom exit seat, and anyway, population in Europe is getting taller on average.

Finally, some schemes have worked well in the past and have just mutated into hollow shells of themselves. easyJet has a priority boarding fee which allows customers who pay for it to use the short queues for checkin, and also be &quot;first onto the plane&quot;. Unfortunately, this has proved so popular that between people who pay the fee, and people who have purchased their frequent flyer card, which basically gives the same benefit, half the plane is now eligible for &quot;speedy boarding&quot; - which makes a mockery of it all. This isn&#039;t in all routes, mind you, but certainly a lot of the more business-flyer heavy ones.

So, yes, there are fees, and I don&#039;t mind paying some of them, and I genuinely prefer good value ones. But some companies do seem to like extracting the urine - somethign apparently Ryanair wants to charge for soon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve seen my share of strange fees &#8211; my personal bugbear is being levied a &#8220;Fuel surcharge&#8221; &#8211; something I&#8217;ve seen TUI airlines do before &#8211; as it makes their fares seem cheaper on price comparison sites. I am booking transport from A to B &#8211; surely the fuel should come included?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve had european airlines play on my fears by trying to charge me &#8220;cancellation insurance&#8221; &#8211; by European law, airlines are required to refund or exchange any flight cancellations, and feed me or put me up in a hotel if the flight is delayed beyond a certain number of hours. (Air Europa, I&#8217;m looking at you)</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know if the European rules regarding liquids and gels are that dissimilar to the TSA ones, but I don&#8217;t mind paying extra for checking bags in on what are basically commuter flights. The mere existence of these charges makes people less likely to check luggage in, and so having to handle the luggage is more costly per passanger now. However, I do object to ludicrous excess weight fees, and I find some airlines&#8217; idea that you can pay for extra bags, but that doesn&#8217;t allow for extra weight quite unfair (easyJet, I&#8217;m looking at you) &#8211; similarly, using non-standard measurments for allowable hand luggage in the hope that people will be forced to check cabin-sized bags in for extra fees downright insulting (Ryanair, I&#8217;m looking at you).</p>
<p>Whilst others seem to be happy to pay for extra legroom, as a tall man, I&#8217;m in two minds. I think of it as discrimination &#8211; and whilst I can vaguely accept it from so-called &#8220;low cost&#8221; airlines, I find it despicable that big traditional airlines such as Iberia are now decreasing seat pitch to whatever the minimum allowable is. Especially, as you cannot necessarily reserve these seats online, the class separator moves around enough that sometimes (on some airbusses with emergency exits at row 9 or 10) you&#8217;re unsure even of which class to get to find a wide legroom exit seat, and anyway, population in Europe is getting taller on average.</p>
<p>Finally, some schemes have worked well in the past and have just mutated into hollow shells of themselves. easyJet has a priority boarding fee which allows customers who pay for it to use the short queues for checkin, and also be &#8220;first onto the plane&#8221;. Unfortunately, this has proved so popular that between people who pay the fee, and people who have purchased their frequent flyer card, which basically gives the same benefit, half the plane is now eligible for &#8220;speedy boarding&#8221; &#8211; which makes a mockery of it all. This isn&#8217;t in all routes, mind you, but certainly a lot of the more business-flyer heavy ones.</p>
<p>So, yes, there are fees, and I don&#8217;t mind paying some of them, and I genuinely prefer good value ones. But some companies do seem to like extracting the urine &#8211; somethign apparently Ryanair wants to charge for soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-34190</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:59:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-34190</guid>
		<description>@Lauren, @Roberto -
While you may be entitled to 4 carryons and 4 personal items with a family of four on purchased tickets (and I don&#039;t think anyone is arguing that), that does means that *all* of those 4 personal items need to go under the seats.  You don&#039;t get to put just the diaper bag under one of the seats, then stuff 4 carryons and 3 personal items up above.  That&#039;s the objection the other posters are making.
And yes, I have 2 kids and each of them started traveling when they were 3 months old.  They are a little older now (7 and 3), carry their own &quot;personal items&quot; (small backpacks) and yes, they go under the seat, as did their diaper bags when they were younger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lauren, @Roberto -<br />
While you may be entitled to 4 carryons and 4 personal items with a family of four on purchased tickets (and I don&#8217;t think anyone is arguing that), that does means that *all* of those 4 personal items need to go under the seats.  You don&#8217;t get to put just the diaper bag under one of the seats, then stuff 4 carryons and 3 personal items up above.  That&#8217;s the objection the other posters are making.<br />
And yes, I have 2 kids and each of them started traveling when they were 3 months old.  They are a little older now (7 and 3), carry their own &#8220;personal items&#8221; (small backpacks) and yes, they go under the seat, as did their diaper bags when they were younger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carver Farrow</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-34133</link>
		<dc:creator>Carver Farrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 00:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-34133</guid>
		<description>@Frosty

I completely agree that the websites could be modified to include optional costs such as luggage.  The airlines are lying if they say otherwise.  Curiously it didn&#039;t take long for them to add fuel charges.  I think the real problem is that if suppose someone buys a ticket and include 2 bags, but only shows up with one. They&#039;ll want a refund for the second bag, which is of course correct. I suspect that the airlines don&#039;t want to manage that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Frosty</p>
<p>I completely agree that the websites could be modified to include optional costs such as luggage.  The airlines are lying if they say otherwise.  Curiously it didn&#8217;t take long for them to add fuel charges.  I think the real problem is that if suppose someone buys a ticket and include 2 bags, but only shows up with one. They&#8217;ll want a refund for the second bag, which is of course correct. I suspect that the airlines don&#8217;t want to manage that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carver Farrow</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-34130</link>
		<dc:creator>Carver Farrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-34130</guid>
		<description>@frosty

Except that business routinely try to get us to use other payment methods.  Been to a gas station lately.  The cash price is cheaper.  Even the grocery store tries to get you to us a PIN instead of a signature based purchase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@frosty</p>
<p>Except that business routinely try to get us to use other payment methods.  Been to a gas station lately.  The cash price is cheaper.  Even the grocery store tries to get you to us a PIN instead of a signature based purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frostysnowman</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-34125</link>
		<dc:creator>frostysnowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 21:20:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-34125</guid>
		<description>That info about pay toilettes on RyanAir is true - I read an interview with the CEO in the WSJ in December and he mentioned it then.  He said if the flights are short, the airline wants to encourage people to go before they get on the plane.  He also said they are thinking of getting rid of some seats and adding a standing room section that would hold more people (not sure about the safety of that one!).

For wireless to be truly worth it on planes, I think the airlines need to think about adding outlets.  I know my laptop battery doesn&#039;t last very long, even on a short flight.

As to charging convenience fees for paying by credit card - the fee that the card companies charge to the airlines is a cost of doing business and has been for years.  It&#039;s not defensible to encourage us to use other payment methods.  How many people in the US honestly go to the airport any pay in cash?  That&#039;s supposed to be a red flag to the airlines, anyway.  The NRF is putting together a big lobbying effort to get transaction fees eliminated or reduced, and if that passes it will affect all companies that accept credit cards.  

I agree that all non-optional fees should just be included in any quoted price.  I think it would be easy for a travel site or airline site to add line item costs for optional items; for example, if you are checking a bag, add X amount.  Then consumers could read the list and add the costs to their ticket price themselves and get a better idea of the total investment in their trip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That info about pay toilettes on RyanAir is true &#8211; I read an interview with the CEO in the WSJ in December and he mentioned it then.  He said if the flights are short, the airline wants to encourage people to go before they get on the plane.  He also said they are thinking of getting rid of some seats and adding a standing room section that would hold more people (not sure about the safety of that one!).</p>
<p>For wireless to be truly worth it on planes, I think the airlines need to think about adding outlets.  I know my laptop battery doesn&#8217;t last very long, even on a short flight.</p>
<p>As to charging convenience fees for paying by credit card &#8211; the fee that the card companies charge to the airlines is a cost of doing business and has been for years.  It&#8217;s not defensible to encourage us to use other payment methods.  How many people in the US honestly go to the airport any pay in cash?  That&#8217;s supposed to be a red flag to the airlines, anyway.  The NRF is putting together a big lobbying effort to get transaction fees eliminated or reduced, and if that passes it will affect all companies that accept credit cards.  </p>
<p>I agree that all non-optional fees should just be included in any quoted price.  I think it would be easy for a travel site or airline site to add line item costs for optional items; for example, if you are checking a bag, add X amount.  Then consumers could read the list and add the costs to their ticket price themselves and get a better idea of the total investment in their trip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carver Farrow</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-34114</link>
		<dc:creator>Carver Farrow</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 16:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-34114</guid>
		<description>@Steve

Completely agree.

Credit cards make things interesting though.  In theory you can avoid a credit card fee by paying cash.  But paying in cash is highly discouraged.  With walk-up penalties, penalties for in person payment, lack of city offices, etc., its really hard to pay for a ticket with cash.  

But at the same token, the credit card companies charge airlines a fee for accepting credit cards so it is defensible to encourage people to use other methods.

For example, go to any store where you self swipe your credit card.  If its a Visa Debit card, the machine tries its best to get you to use the PIN rather than the VISA because the PIN cost far less to the merchant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Steve</p>
<p>Completely agree.</p>
<p>Credit cards make things interesting though.  In theory you can avoid a credit card fee by paying cash.  But paying in cash is highly discouraged.  With walk-up penalties, penalties for in person payment, lack of city offices, etc., its really hard to pay for a ticket with cash.  </p>
<p>But at the same token, the credit card companies charge airlines a fee for accepting credit cards so it is defensible to encourage people to use other methods.</p>
<p>For example, go to any store where you self swipe your credit card.  If its a Visa Debit card, the machine tries its best to get you to use the PIN rather than the VISA because the PIN cost far less to the merchant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-34109</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 15:35:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-34109</guid>
		<description>&quot;If it’s not something I can legitimately decline, then it should be bundled into the base fare, period.&quot;

Totally agreed.  I also think the fee to simply reserve a seat, or for a window/aisle seat (if it&#039;s a standard seat and not the exit row or one with more legroom) is ridiculous, too, and an example of a pure money grab.

But I don&#039;t have a problem with checked bag fees or any other fee that I can choose not to pay based on not needing a service.  I also don&#039;t buy the argument that TSA restrictions make it necessary to check a bag, because I can easily buy travel-size containers of whatever liquids I need to bring, and even though I&#039;m paying more per ounce the convenience of not having to wait for my bag - if the airline didn&#039;t lose it - is well worth it.  I check a bag when the amount of stuff I&#039;m bringing makes it necessary to, and I fly whatever carrier is cheapest after I&#039;ve factored in the bag fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;If it’s not something I can legitimately decline, then it should be bundled into the base fare, period.&#8221;</p>
<p>Totally agreed.  I also think the fee to simply reserve a seat, or for a window/aisle seat (if it&#8217;s a standard seat and not the exit row or one with more legroom) is ridiculous, too, and an example of a pure money grab.</p>
<p>But I don&#8217;t have a problem with checked bag fees or any other fee that I can choose not to pay based on not needing a service.  I also don&#8217;t buy the argument that TSA restrictions make it necessary to check a bag, because I can easily buy travel-size containers of whatever liquids I need to bring, and even though I&#8217;m paying more per ounce the convenience of not having to wait for my bag &#8211; if the airline didn&#8217;t lose it &#8211; is well worth it.  I check a bag when the amount of stuff I&#8217;m bringing makes it necessary to, and I fly whatever carrier is cheapest after I&#8217;ve factored in the bag fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jasper</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-34102</link>
		<dc:creator>Jasper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-34102</guid>
		<description>@ Ryanair fees: I think it&#039;s cheap and easy to hit Ryanair for their fees. I hate these fees as much as most people, and do not understand the economics, because my guess is that a lot of the fee goes to paying for the collection and administration of the fee. 

However, Ryanair is a different case. Their business model is different. Their flights are pretty much free. Seriously, check these fares. Five quid to fly from Liverpool to Krakow. Try and find me a flight from Key West, FL to Kansas City for $7, including taxes and fees (oooh, evil regulation). For me the difference between Ryanair and all other airlines is that al the other airlines forgot to eliminate their ticket pricing, while adding fees.

Having paid nothing for a ticket, I kinda expect being nickeled and dimes. Having paid $359+taxes and fees, I kinda get pissed of when I get nickeled and dimed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Ryanair fees: I think it&#8217;s cheap and easy to hit Ryanair for their fees. I hate these fees as much as most people, and do not understand the economics, because my guess is that a lot of the fee goes to paying for the collection and administration of the fee. </p>
<p>However, Ryanair is a different case. Their business model is different. Their flights are pretty much free. Seriously, check these fares. Five quid to fly from Liverpool to Krakow. Try and find me a flight from Key West, FL to Kansas City for $7, including taxes and fees (oooh, evil regulation). For me the difference between Ryanair and all other airlines is that al the other airlines forgot to eliminate their ticket pricing, while adding fees.</p>
<p>Having paid nothing for a ticket, I kinda expect being nickeled and dimes. Having paid $359+taxes and fees, I kinda get pissed of when I get nickeled and dimed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-34096</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-34096</guid>
		<description>@Lauren, @Roxy, et al -- as someone who flies with the wife and 2 kids (and sometimes my wife flies alone with the kids), we are generally able to fit everything for the flights into carryons that can fit under the seat.  We did always purchase seats for the kids and use the carseats when they were under 2.  Everything else gets checked.

Usually the only thing I put in the overhead is my coat, and I&#039;ve managed to leave 2 on the plane (different times!); my wife taught the kids to say &quot;Daddy, don&#039;t forget your jacket&quot; as soon as we land.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lauren, @Roxy, et al &#8212; as someone who flies with the wife and 2 kids (and sometimes my wife flies alone with the kids), we are generally able to fit everything for the flights into carryons that can fit under the seat.  We did always purchase seats for the kids and use the carseats when they were under 2.  Everything else gets checked.</p>
<p>Usually the only thing I put in the overhead is my coat, and I&#8217;ve managed to leave 2 on the plane (different times!); my wife taught the kids to say &#8220;Daddy, don&#8217;t forget your jacket&#8221; as soon as we land.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/good-airline-fees-some-are-worth-the-money/comment-page-1/#comment-34095</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 04:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=10835#comment-34095</guid>
		<description>One thing that needs to be enforced (by the FTC or FAA if necessary) is that the fees correspond to *delivered* services:

If you pay $15 for a seat assignment, and that seat is not available for whatever reason, the fee should be cheerfully refunded.  A reasonable substitute (another window a few rows away) might be acceptable; a middle seat in the back, or separating a couple who paid the fee is not.

Same for bag fees -- if the bag isn&#039;t delivered on that flight, the checked-bag fee should be refunded.  I&#039;d certainly dispute the charge immediately, and consider small claims court if the credit card company didn&#039;t side with me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thing that needs to be enforced (by the FTC or FAA if necessary) is that the fees correspond to *delivered* services:</p>
<p>If you pay $15 for a seat assignment, and that seat is not available for whatever reason, the fee should be cheerfully refunded.  A reasonable substitute (another window a few rows away) might be acceptable; a middle seat in the back, or separating a couple who paid the fee is not.</p>
<p>Same for bag fees &#8212; if the bag isn&#8217;t delivered on that flight, the checked-bag fee should be refunded.  I&#8217;d certainly dispute the charge immediately, and consider small claims court if the credit card company didn&#8217;t side with me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

