What's the book corporate America doesn't want you to read? Find out now -- or you could get scammed.

Forget flying – take the train

February 9, 1998

For business travelers, taking the train used to be only slightly more popular than hitchhiking. Unruly passengers, dilapidated stations and slow service made rail travel extremely uncomfortable.

But times are changing. With Northwest and Continental planning to merge, and Delta eyeing US Airways for purchase, airline ticket prices are bound to continue orbiting into the stratosphere. Corporate agency Rosenbluth Travel predicts an almost 10 percent jump in unrestricted coach fares this year.

Meanwhile, Amtrak is getting its act together. The National Railroad Passenger Corporation is making improvements to its facilities and adding new high-speed links between major business-travel cities.

Attitudes are changing along the way. You can hear it in travelers like David Stephen of Duluth, Minn., who was so disenchanted by a recent flight from Minneapolis to New Orleans that he vows, “Next time, I’ll take the train.”

He might save some money. Flying generally costs more than twice as much as the train, and in some cases, like Chicago-Detroit, way more than that. How much? Try $545 more.

Amtrak suggests there are a lot of road warriors like Stephen out there, and that more of them are riding the train. On stretches such as Oakland- Bakersfield in California, for example, traffic was up 21 percent last year over 1996.

“If the price of airfares get high enough, people will take the train,” says University of Portland (Ore.) finance professor Richard Gritta, an expert on the economics of the transportation business. “I’m just not sure when the American public is going to wise up.”

Perhaps when the trains get back on track-and air fares soar even higher. At the rate the airlines are hiking prices, it looks as if flying on business will be prohibitively expensive by the turn of the century, giving trains an easy opening to attract hordes of angry travelers.

It’s all a question of money and time. Amtrak is getting a much-needed $344 million in federal subsidies in the fiscal year that ends Sept. 30 and has asked for $376 million for fiscal 1999. It recently persuaded Congress to earmark $2.3 billion in capital funding for upgrades to its trains, tracks and other equipment.

What’s more, trains are getting faster. And when the trip between Milwaukee and Chicago takes about an hour by rail, what’s the point of schlepping your stuff out to O’Hare?

“I think there’s more interest in high-speed rail projects than there ever has been,” says Mark Dysart, president of the High Speed Ground Transportation Association in Washington. “Maybe we’re just becoming more aware of our options as we suffer more gridlock and winglock.”

Could it be that the harder the airlines squeeze business travelers, the more high-revenue passengers they lose? We’ll see.

Christopher Elliott is the author of Scammed: How to Save Your Money and Find Better Service in a World of Schemes, Swindles, and Shady Deals. Critics have called it “eye-opening” and “inspiring” — it’ll “grab your attention and won’t let go.” Order your copy now on Amazon, Barnes & Noble or iTunes.

4 comments

  • John V.

    While trains trips are too long for transcontinental markets (Chicago-New York, for example,)they make sense in some markets. Downtown Washington, DC, to New York Penn Station is 2hours and 45 minutes– a lot faster than flying when you factor in getting to/from the airports, security check-in times, delays in the air, etc. It’s definitely a mode that more travelers need to explore. And they can save a lot of money, as you point out!

  • Carrie C.

    A couple of weeks ago, I went from EWR to BWI by train. I arrived 20 minutes before departure, enjoyed ample leg room during my trip and was free to “move about the cabin” whenever I felt like it. The return trip took place during high winds and heavy rain. I’m sure I would have been delayed hours at the airport, but my train arrived only 5 minutes late. I also decided to take this trip at the last minute and saved big bucks over flying.

  • Jerry Mandel

    Parking is a problem when riding trains. Airports have massive parking both onsite and with offsite paces. So, when travelling round trip on trains, where do you leave your car and at comparable costs?

  • Catherine Elliott

    I have researched train travel as an alternative for a semi annual trip my family takes from Phoenix to NY. Not only was I hoping to find better prices but I thought it could be a fun way to see the country. Unfortunatly, the routing from our location would require traveling significantly out of the way and the whole trip would take up to 5 days each way and require changing trains with wait times around 12 hours or more. When you factor in meals and a sleeper car for the family the price jumps to more than 4 TIMES the cost of an airline ticket. The cost and the amount of time currently makes train travel unreasonable. I would welcome improvements in the railway system – anything to avoid the nightmare of flying!!

Previous post:

Next post: