<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ban the bins?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/ban-the-bins/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/ban-the-bins/</link>
	<description>Consumer advocate Christopher Elliott&#039;s site.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carver</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/ban-the-bins/comment-page-1/#comment-46357</link>
		<dc:creator>Carver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 05:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.elliott.org/photos/ban-the-bins/#comment-46357</guid>
		<description>As usual, some well meaning but utterly clueless folks want to use a sledgehammer to solve a problem that requires a scalpel

@Chris

&quot;It doesn’t take a mathematician to extrapolate that the number of UFO-related injuries in the United States is vast.&quot; 
------------------
Or perhaps it does

@Chris

Robison estimates that 12 people a day are hurt by falling carry-ons.
----------------------------

Sounds like a lot. Perhaps. Until we add a little math to the problem.  US airlines carry about 650 million passengers annually.  That average to about 1.8 MILLION passengers.  Of that 1.8 MILLION passengers, (That&#039;s MILLION with an M) most of whom have a carryon, only 12 were injured by carryon luggage.  Hardly seems like a vast number.

IF we consider this to be a real problem, then obvious solutions present themselves.

1.  Enforce carryon restrictions to preent injury, materials, weight etc.
2.  Add better latches to prevent premature opening</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As usual, some well meaning but utterly clueless folks want to use a sledgehammer to solve a problem that requires a scalpel</p>
<p>@Chris</p>
<p>&#8220;It doesn’t take a mathematician to extrapolate that the number of UFO-related injuries in the United States is vast.&#8221;<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;<br />
Or perhaps it does</p>
<p>@Chris</p>
<p>Robison estimates that 12 people a day are hurt by falling carry-ons.<br />
&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;&#8212;-</p>
<p>Sounds like a lot. Perhaps. Until we add a little math to the problem.  US airlines carry about 650 million passengers annually.  That average to about 1.8 MILLION passengers.  Of that 1.8 MILLION passengers, (That&#8217;s MILLION with an M) most of whom have a carryon, only 12 were injured by carryon luggage.  Hardly seems like a vast number.</p>
<p>IF we consider this to be a real problem, then obvious solutions present themselves.</p>
<p>1.  Enforce carryon restrictions to preent injury, materials, weight etc.<br />
2.  Add better latches to prevent premature opening</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sally</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/ban-the-bins/comment-page-1/#comment-46350</link>
		<dc:creator>sally</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.elliott.org/photos/ban-the-bins/#comment-46350</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d say do away with the bins when airlines can guarantee that the checked luggage will arrive intact.  No pilferage by employees. Until then, they can&#039;t seriously expect us to check the valuables we must travel with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say do away with the bins when airlines can guarantee that the checked luggage will arrive intact.  No pilferage by employees. Until then, they can&#8217;t seriously expect us to check the valuables we must travel with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dina g.</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/the-travel-critic/ban-the-bins/comment-page-1/#comment-1350</link>
		<dc:creator>dina g.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 22:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://beta.elliott.org/photos/ban-the-bins/#comment-1350</guid>
		<description>Air New Zealand is pretty strict about their 7 kilos only for overhead-bin luggage.  I was able to get my carry-on (I hate checking luggage -- my luggage has been lost/delayed 3 times) down to 7 Kilo by putting on a few sweaters and transferring a book to my purse.  If the US starts enforcing their weight restrictions, guess I&#039;ll be traveling even lighter!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Air New Zealand is pretty strict about their 7 kilos only for overhead-bin luggage.  I was able to get my carry-on (I hate checking luggage &#8212; my luggage has been lost/delayed 3 times) down to 7 Kilo by putting on a few sweaters and transferring a book to my purse.  If the US starts enforcing their weight restrictions, guess I&#8217;ll be traveling even lighter!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

