What's the book corporate America doesn't want you to read? Find out now -- or you could get scammed.

With air security, travelers are flying blind

November 29, 2009

IMG_9923The Transportation Security Administration likes to keep terrorists guessing. Apparently, it likes to keep travelers guessing, too.

And we do. Shoes on — or off? Laptop computer in the bag — or on the conveyor belt? And tickets: middle name, middle initial or just first and last? Oh, and are they going to pull you over at the gate for additional screening?

“We don’t want to be consistent,” TSA spokeswoman Lauren Gaches told me. “We want to be flexible. We don’t want a checklist mentality. If we are predictable, it could become easier for someone who wants to do us harm to figure out the system.”


A little context is in order. Gaches and I were talking about TSA officers’ essential ability to use their discretion during the screening process, and why some of them, for example, allow a half-empty tube of Crest in a carry-on bag to slide through but will pull aside travelers for no reason other than that they think they look suspicious.

There’s no denying that air travelers are often perplexed by the screening process.

Last year, for instance, TSA officers at North Dakota’s Grand Forks International Airport told Susan Jean Schostag that she could pack a few jars of peanut butter in her carry-on luggage. (Why on Earth would anyone bring 16 ounces of Skippy on a plane? Schostag, an administrative assistant who lives in Grand Forks, was flying to Germany. And if you’ve ever lived in Germany, you know it’s almost impossible to find good peanut butter there.)

But this fall, a TSA agent at the same airport told her that peanut butter was verboten in carry-on bags. “We know about the liquid rule, of course,” Schostag said. “But this is just stupid.”

Or how about Kenneth Akin — actually, make that Kenneth Alexander Akin Jr., a retiree from Sierra Vista, Ariz. His name is the problem. “I’m not really sure what the hell TSA is asking for and what the airlines are doing,” he told me. He’s flying to Mexico this month and can’t figure out what name should be on his airline ticket.

In preparation for TSA’s Secure Flight program, which is intended to streamline the watchlist matching process and is now being put into effect, his airline asked him to update his frequent flier accounts with his full legal name as it appears on his ID. But that’s easier said than done. The name fields allowed him to revise his account only to add a middle name, but no “Jr.” “When I tried to do ‘Akin, Jr.’ I got a minus on my report card,” he said.

Airlines grading passengers? What’s this world coming to?

“So TSA wants full name, but the airlines do not develop the form to input the full name,” Akin said.

There are perfectly good explanations for both of those apparent inconsistencies. Secure Flight, the TSA will tell you, is a work in progress, and the agency’s liquid-and-gel rules are clearly spelled out on its Web site. (How they’re interpreted — well, that’s another story.)

I asked security expert Bruce Schneier, one of the TSA’s most outspoken critics, why air travelers continue to be confounded by the rules. “Because,” he said, “they’re confusing.”

He doesn’t see the point to the airport screening theater. “If you try to figure out the point, you’ll be frustrated,” he told me.

Maybe the TSA is a little confused, too. Try working for an agency where you have to be transparent, yet at the same time opaque; where customers expect consistency but you need to stay unpredictable; and where the only real measure of success is when nothing happens. No wonder the agency has an alarmingly high turnover rate among senior executives, according to a recent U.S. Government Accountability Office report.

I can’t be objective or even consistent on the subject of the TSA and the way it treats air travelers. I’ve been covering this agency from the beginning, and in the eight years since its creation, I’ve criticized it, praised it, ridiculed it, called for more funding and for it to be de-funded. If TSA has been consistent about one thing, it’s the way in which it mystifies the travelers it’s supposed to protect.

You want a quick fix? Sorry. My best advice is to expect the unexpected when you arrive at the airport. Give yourself more time than they say you need. Put everything on the conveyor belt. Be prepared for a secondary screening, a frisking, a game of 20 Questions.

That’s how the TSA likes it.

(Photo: Alex E. Proimos/Flickr Creative Commons)

Christopher Elliott is the author of Scammed: How to Save Your Money and Find Better Service in a World of Schemes, Swindles, and Shady Deals. Critics have called it “eye-opening” and “inspiring” — it’ll “grab your attention and won’t let go.” Order your copy now on Amazon, Barnes & Noble or iTunes.

13 comments

  • Sean

    On a recent flight, my shoes caused quite the consternation for one TSA screener. I fly weekly and wear the same shoes, however this day, the screener at the x-ray had my shoes scanned twice, explosive wiped twice, then proceeded to take the insole out and scan and wipe the shoes again. He handed them back to me and said “I guess they are fine, but the sure do look strange under x-ray.” There is apparently some “gel” type substance in the heel of the shoe for comfort . . . I guess I’ll have to make sure it’s less then 3.4 oz for the next time I fly. I’ve never had an issue before, I guess it’s some of that unpredictability that should be expected.

  • http://wheelstraveler.blogspot.com Darryl Musick

    Hi Chris,
    I really enjoy your website and have used the information there to smooth the way when I travel. In fact, just last week I used some of the information I learned to settle a $250 dispute I had with my latest hotel.

    I’d like to invite you to take a look at our blog. My son and I produce a site that records our travelogues as we go around the country and the world using a wheelchair. It’s at http://wheelstraveler.blogspot.com/ and, if you like it, maybe you can put in a link to it.

    Thanks for your time and the job you’re doing.

    -Darryl Musick
    The World on Wheels

  • Thomas Brenneman

    I just flew out of Las Vegas last week. The couple in front of me were stopped at the end of the conveyor. Seem the TSA agent found a lighter in their carry-on. They explained it was a gift. The agent told them is was forbidden to bring a lighter through security, but it was o.k. for them to buy another one from a gift shop and carry it on the plane once they had passed through security. ??????????????????????????

  • Brian C

    The TSA just hung itself with its own words. The rules have to be consistently enforced, not based on what the traveler looks like or how they act. If liquids and “things that can be spread” are going to banned, they have to be banned for everyone. Otherwise, you get enough people trying, and someone is going to get something dangerous through.

    Checklists are exactly what they need, with the understanding that officers can go “beyond the checklist” to adapt to new threats and evaluate anyone they think may be suspicious. Pilots use checklists to ensure that they have checked everything they need to so our planes fly safely. If lists are good enough to ensure that 300 ton hunks of metal are safe to hurtle through the air at 500 mph, I don’t see why lists, and the consistent application of rules, aren’t good enough to ensure the people on those hunks of metal don’t pose a threat.

  • KF

    I’ve had problems with my TSA-approved laptop sleeve – apparently approved is a loose term and before my last flight I had to take off the sweater I was wearing over a tshirt – and both were fitted, so there wasn’t a question of me concealing something.

  • Don

    I used to carry a very small swiss army style pocket knife – it had a blade about an inch long and a pair of tweezers – I forgot I had it in my pocket once at JFK and of course had to throw it away – only to purchase it again on the other side of TSA.

  • Adrian Shadowmoss

    Want REAL airport security screening? Try Ben Gurion Int’l Airport in Isreal.
    It has got to be the most thorough of all I’ve ever been through. They screen and do some things that we would never allow in the U.S. (profile, for example).
    Anyway, TSA could take a lesson or two from them.
    APS

  • Liz

    To give TSA a tiny bit of credit (which may be more than they deserve), they have gotten better about consistency on some things – I think that all travelers know that shoes come off, liquids go in a ziploc and laptops are to be removed from their bags. I haven’t encountered a deviation from those in a while.

  • Lisa Skier

    But do shoes go on the conveyor belt or in the bucket?

  • frostysnowman

    @ Lisa Skier – that depends on the airport. In ATL, it’s the belt. In Omaha, it could be either. In Richmond, it’s the bucket. We definitely need some consistency there.

    I completely agree with what Ben C and Adrian have to say. I know people who’ve been to Isreal and they’ve said the same things about security there.

  • Jeanne

    @Lisa Skier and frostsnowman: The last time I flew out of Eppley (Omaha’s airport) I asked about the shoes – belt or bucket? They told me that some shoes placed directly on the belt have had problems entering or exiting the machine, because of straps, laces, buckles, etc. catching. TSA there told me they know about the belt directive, but it goes against common sense and experience, so they still use the bucket.

    In Rome, I got to keep my shoes on while going through the screening process. Everywhere I’ve flown in the US, it’s been shoes off.

    I just smile pleasantly and do what they tell me to do and thank them for their help. I’ve had the additional screening for the oddest things in my carry-on. At Eppley, my husband’s corkscrew with foil cutter didn’t pass muster the last time (although having passed many times before). The TSA agent there was kind enough to tell him about an airport shop that would mail it back home, and gave me his carry-on to watch while he ran back and mailed the corkscrew to the house. He had to go through screening again, but the agent watched for him and waved him over to her to let him get through quickly. We thanked the agent and made our flight with no problem – but had to buy a cheap corkscrew once we reached our destination! Which of course we left behind when we packed . . .

  • Lianne

    Tampa I’ntl also lets you put shoes in the bucket. And I have to say that TPA has probably the nicest TSA I’ve ever dealt with.

    I thought there was a rumor that the stupid liquid ban was going to be lifted sometime in 2009 tho…I guess no such luck.

  • Ames

    In answer to why pack peanut butter or why I have packed Cains’ mayonaise, Vermont maple syrup or salsa from a special restaurant – this is why one travels. To enjoy special things that are not available everywhere and either bring some home or bring some of home to some one else. I have double plastic bagged, taped and labeled so things could travel in my checked luggage – even throwing in extra bags and a roll of tape with a note to the TSA explaining what the item is and asking for special care in rewrapping if it had to be opened. So far so good, nothing lost, nothing opened. But watching my daughter enjoy the salsa she cannot find anywhere else is well worth all the planning.

Previous post:

Next post: