• What's elliott?
• About elliott
• Contact us

t o p i c s

• Business
• Commentary
• Destinations
• Help
• Leisure
• Technology
• Vault

Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information, call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail to us.

Do New Laws Persecute Wireless Travelers?
The Travel Technologist · July 19, 2001

These aren't the best of times for travelers who use cell phones.

A few weeks ago, a woman on a Czech Airlines flight landed on the wrong side of the law when she whipped out her wireless device in midair, despite repeated warnings from a flight attendant. According to a police spokesman, the call temporarily disrupted the turboprop's navigation devices and jammed communication between the plane and the tower. She faces one year in jail if convicted.

And earlier this month, the New York state Assembly approved a measure that would make New York the first state to ban of the use of hand-held cell phones while driving. Motorists caught in the act of chatting while steering a car could get fined up to $100. The legislation does not address the issue of dialing while driving and tickets can be dismissed if you show the judge a receipt that proves you've bought a hands-free cell phone system.

To road warriors who depend on cell phones, the clampdown looks like the beginning of witch-hunt. Travelers like John Getter are frustrated with the turn of events and want to stop the cell phone persecution before it goes too far.

"This is all about petty power trips, not safety," he says. "Since distracted driving is already illegal, let's outlaw driving altogether. Far more people die in cars than aboard 'public' transit. Let's ban doctors. They kill thousands more than cell phones. Let's ban alcohol and tobacco - big killers. And let's outlaw risk and simply mandate that everyone, everyplace must stay inside and safe so they will never die."

His rage is not unusual among jet setters. Already trapped in a microcosm of outrageously expensive air fares, dwindling service levels, overcrowded airport terminals, hotels and car rental companies that add surprise surcharges to bills, and technology that rarely works the way it's supposed to, many business travelers are perilously close to flying off the handle.

"I think the airlines and the authorities need to get very clear on what technology truly creates problems," says Henry Mensch. "They keep broadening the list of technologies which are deemed troublesome, and many of these technologies have never actually been proven to cause trouble."

Mensch wonders how much of a hazard a cell phone actually is after a plane lands, for example. The reason: a British Midland flight attendant recently gave him "grief" after he tried to make a call before reaching the gate. "Would the pilot suddenly have trouble finding the gate because my phone was on?" he asks.

Bob Trimble, a Vancouver, Wash., pilot who is also a telecommunications expert, says cell phones shouldn't affect communications on the ground but can affect an aircraft's ability to communicate in the air. Still, airlines have a set of rules that could put a passenger like Mensch at odds with the cabin crew. Are a few minutes of waiting on the tarmac really worth getting arrested for?

Before I continue, a disclaimer: Eight years ago I was run off the road by a truck whose driver was using a cell phone, so I'm sympathetic to those who say we should restrict wireless devices. I also practice what I preach. I won't answer a cell phone while I'm driving, won't make a call while I'm steering a vehicle, won't phone home from a plane. It's not always easy, but I think it's the safe thing to do.

When I hear from readers like David Deehl, I am convinced that I'm on the right side of the argument. Deehl is trial lawyer who is representing a woman whose husband was killed by a high school student speeding in an SUV while dialing her cell phone. "I asked [the student] if she was using her cell phone, and she denied it. I subpoenaed her cell phone records and she was on the phone at the exact time - 2:20 p.m. - that the crash occurred," he says.

Deehl believes that the combination of a novice driver operating a sports utility vehicle, using a cell phone and not paying attention to the road, resulted in his client's husband's death. "She actually crossed the centerline and hit [him] when he was already in the other lane of traffic at an intersection. [The deceased] was a wonderful man who was working to help an orphanage in Haiti, and serving meals as a volunteer at a homeless shelter. His widow and family miss him terribly," he told me.

I'm not the only one who thinks that limiting cell phones - whether on a car or on a plane - is a good idea. Business travel expert Jonathan Meigs, who has been following this issue a lot longer than I have, believes restricting some wireless devices is reasonable.

"As far as the cell phone crackdown goes, I'm all for limiting the use of cell phones, especially in the close confines of an airplane cabin - safety issues aside, and they are open to question - I hate listening to some yahoo bond trader or salesman bragging about himself loudly while I'm trying to work or read or even talk to an associate. Talking on the phone while driving is very dangerous. I've lost 30 to 60 seconds of time at 70 mph concentrating on a phone conversation while driving," he says.

And yet some of us remain on the line, figuratively speaking. We know that the rules make sense on one level, but we're also opposed to the idea of more laws. We're responsible technology users, after all. We would never do something to endanger the life of another driver or a fellow passenger. Can' t the airlines, the state governments, just trust us?

Ken Krause sees parallels to another time in American history when the public overreacted to a problem. "All these headline-grabbing legislators are going to find out what the well-meaning Prohibitionists did in the 1920s - once the genie is out of the bottle, you can't put him back in," says the Arlington Heights, Ill., account manager for a technology company.

Have we gone too far? Have we not gone far enough?

The answer to both questions is "yes." We've gone too far in the sense that we've created a patchwork of new laws designed to treat the symptoms, but not cure the disease. Because wireless technology is constantly evolving, it's practically impossible for rules to keep up with it. What happens, for example, when 3G technology lets us videoconference? What good will "hands free" laws be for drivers when their eyes aren't on the road?

We have also not gone far enough because the wireless industry is fighting government regulation instead of collaborating with governments on ways to educate customers about responsible use - in a car or a plane. The disease, if you'd like to call it that, is that a dangerous minority of cell phone customers lacks the common sense to know right from wrong when it comes to technology.

We ought to prefer education to legislation. Only when that doesn't work should we pass laws that restrict our freedom to use cellular phones.

Christopher Elliott is a travel commentator based in Annapolis, Md. All e-mailed questions may be edited, condensed or republished at the site's discretion. The Travel Technologist appears weekly on this site. This story was also published on Biztravel.com.