|
What's
elliott?
About elliott
Contact us
t o p i c s
Business
Commentary
Destinations
Help
Leisure
Technology
Vault
Read
back issues. Like what you
see? Now you can become an underwriter.
a l s o
Referring sites
Public relations
Visit Tripso
Home
s e a r c h
Find a story.
Copyright Elliott Publishing. All rights reserved. For more information,
call (305) 453-4781 or send e-mail
to us.
|
|
Mad As Hell
and I'm Not Going to Tech it Anymore
The Travel Technologist · August
9, 2001
What ticks you off
about technology when you travel?
Is it those surprise hotel phone surcharges that no one told you about
when you checked in? How about your crash-prone computer operating system?
Maybe it's your crappy cell phone?
You know. But do you know what your fellow road warriors think? If you're
interested - and don't lie to me, I know you are - then skip those statistically
meaningless polls and ignore the tidy sound bites delivered by the overpaid
analysts in cheap suits. Just click through this
column's archives.
A pointless exercise? Not if you want to have a better trip.
This is the only weekly column about travel and technology - online or
offline. Nowhere else will you find a more tightly focused or timely feature
on the topic. But what you don't see is the other half - the thousands
of e-mails that I get from readers. It's these missives that offer a rare
glimpse into the soul of the road warrior.
I'm sure the marketing mavens of the world would pay big bucks for these
insights, but this week, they're yours for free. Why? Because knowing
what travelers don't like about their technology means you can better
avoid the hassles and headaches of going places with your gadgets. Or
at least try to.
The trouble with cell phones. We love them. We hate them. But
mostly, we can't live without them. They're our connection to the outside
world, our lifelines, and even our virtual security blankets. It's difficult
to exaggerate what cell phones have become to frequent travelers, which
may also explain why some of the angriest e-mails I get are about mobile
phones. Responding to a recent column on the mysterious nature of roaming
fees, reader Donna Baldinger irately denounced the surcharges as "a rip-off."
She quickly added that carriers should be allowed to make a profit - but
not by being deceptive. "To do things sneaky is not the American way,"
she wrote. "We are competitive, not underhanded."
Cheryl Brownstein, a consultant from Marco Island, Fla., got a "$500 shock"
when AT&T bought out her Cellular One contract recently. "My bill more
than quadrupled," she remembers. "That was the last straw."
Solution? She switched to another carrier.
But roaming fees are only part of a much broader problem with wireless
devices. In the past, readers have ranted about the lack of cellular connections
at airports (we spent two columns on that subject), dropped calls (another
two columns), airline crews who disdain wireless callers (three columns,
at least) and callers distracted by doing something really important,
like driving. And it's no stretch to say that I've written half a dozen
columns on motorists and cell phones.
Put differently, a good place to start when you're trying to figure out
what travelers love to hate is the cell phone.
The OS mess. Microsoft unveils its eagerly-anticipated Windows
XP computer operating system in a few weeks. Meanwhile, Mac users are
still trying to figure OS X out and let's face it, the Palm OS could use
an update (it might help the company's lackluster earnings, you know).
Regardless of how you slice or dice it, the operating systems we use when
we travel aren't made for us; they lack many of the basic features that
road warriors need and they're scripted by engineers who think they know
what travelers want but who rarely darken the door of an aircraft.
"Windows ME sucks," declared reader Kirk Short of Truckee, Calif., in
response to a column about whether the Microsoft OS was any good for travelers.
(My conclusion: it isn't.) "It is impossible to get any support satisfaction
from Microsoft. Its $35 per-incident charge is offensive. It echoes a
Dilbert cartoon that says, 'We have a new business plan. We will ship
defective products and make our money on tech support.'" (For the record,
Microsoft doesn't divulge its income from tech support in its annual report.)
Bad connections. Another annoyance: anything having to do with
an Internet connection, from unexpected phone charges to high-speed connections
that don't work. It took two columns to get to the bottom of a reprehensible
practice of billing business travelers for Internet connection time by
the minute. That's a practice that cash-strapped hotels are, if anything,
doing more often now. "It's outrageous," quipped reader Deborah Terrill
from Eugene, Ore., who managed to rack up more than $400 in phone charges
at a Crowne Plaza property in Toronto. She was mostly surfing the Internet.
Ditto for high-speed Internet access. I've lost count of how many articles
I've written that have either mentioned high-speed access or have been
the sole focus of it. In one, I interviewed John Patrick, an IBM manager
who lamented the lack of any reliable connection - let alone a
high-speed one.
I never bothered to question the economics of high-speed connections in
this column until I heard from Greg Salloum, the general manager for a
Best Western property in Kelowna, British Columbia. The reason many hotels
don't offer high-speed connections - or ones that don't work right - is
that they haven't paid for it. "The system is provided at no charge [to
the hotel] so the service company could then profit-share with the hotel
- something like a long-term lease," he explained. "I didn't like the
idea of being beholden to a lease company, so I bought a high-speed Internet
system from a local software provider and gave it away guests as an amenity."
Unlike most of the technology developers, hoteliers and airline executives
I cover in this column, Salloum is part of the solution, not the problem.
But problems remain.
While these aren't necessarily the top three technology-related annoyances,
it's a safe bet that they're near the top. That's based on nearly four
years worth of columns and day-to-day contact with frequent travelers
like you. Unless I'm being lied to, I would say that there are a lot of
very irritated travelers out there who wish someone would just give them
what they want: a cell phone that works, a reliable Internet connection
and an OS that doesn't constantly crash.
Is that asking too much?
Christopher Elliott is a travel
commentator based in Annapolis, Md. All e-mailed questions may be edited,
condensed or republished at the site's discretion. The
Travel Technologist appears weekly on this site. This
story was also published on Biztravel.com.
|
|
|