Should a glitch in Lufthansa’s website cost me $840?

When Laura Dovalo tried to book tickets on Lufthansa for herself and her children, she received an error message — twice. She tried to rebook her flights, and the third time was a charm – until she discovered that she had booked “overlapping flights” that cost her $840 more than she had intended to pay.

“How is it even possible to purchase overlapping flights?” Dovalo asks.

Unfortunately, sometimes consumers who self-book flight or hotel reservations run afoul of websites that seem to reject initial bookings. When that happens, they often change booking sites or alter their reservations slightly, by changing travel dates or payment methods — only to find themselves with two or more sets of reservations. Dovalo’s story is a warning to self-booking travelers to not hurry to rebook travel reservations if online bookings don’t seem to go through — and not to change travel plans. Otherwise, you may end up charged multiple times for similar reservations.

Dovalo’s story begins with her initial attempt to book three round-trip “Economy Light” tickets from Santiago de Compostela, Spain, to Helsinki via Frankfurt, Germany, on Lufthansa’s website. After selecting the flights and completing the booking screens, she clicked the button to complete the purchase. A red error message flashed on the screen, asking Dovalo to change her payment method. It did not contain a confirmation message or reservation number.

She tried again, only to receive the same request that she change her payment method. And again, the website did not provide any confirmation of her purchase or reservation number. So Dovalo began the booking process again from the beginning. But this time, she couldn’t find any available flights for the same departure date, so she made a third attempt to book tickets, now on flights with a departure date a few days later than the flights she had originally tried to book.

Related story:   Happy holidays? JetBlue slams grieving grandson with booking fee, walk-up fare

Using still another payment method, she successfully booked the reservations and received a confirmation with a reservation number.

Then Dovalo checked the payment account that she had tried to use on the two failed booking attempts. It showed two charges pending. She then called Lufthansa and found that both the first and the third purchase attempts had resulted in completed reservations.

Don’t worry, Lufthansa’s agent told her, the charges were not “real” and would eventually disappear. The next day, Dovalo called her bank and was told the same thing — don’t worry, no funds had been transferred.

But five days later, Dovalo’s bank account was debited for the first “failed” purchase attempt. She then called Lufthansa’s customer service and was told by an agent that no funds had been transferred.

At this point, Dovalo checked her email and was shocked to find confirmation letters for the two overlapping sets of flights. She called Lufthansa’s customer service yet again, but was told by the same agent to whom she had previously spoken that yes, she had purchased overlapping flights.  And when Dovalo explained the error messages again to the agent, she “was met with rudeness and disbelief.”

The agent told Dovalo that there was nothing Lufthansa could do, because Dovalo had not canceled the extra flights within 24 hours of the issuance of the tickets. Dovalo responded that she had called Lufthansa that same day, only to be told that the transactions were “not real.” The agent then accused Dovalo of not having mentioned the two different departure dates to her colleague, who would have seen that she had been issued two sets of tickets.

Related story:   How much does my airline owe me for a broken seat?

After a third call to Lufthansa’s customer service, a supervisor told Dovalo the same thing: she should have canceled within 24 hours of the purchase.

Dovalo filled out a form on Lufthansa’s website asking for a transcript of the first call she had made to Lufthansa’s customer service, in which she had mentioned the different dates and given a detailed description of her transactions to the agent to whom she had spoken. She asked for full reimbursement of one of the two sets of flights, and indicated that as an alternative, she was willing to pay for an upgrade from “Economy Light” to “Economy Classic” seats.

Lufthansa sent Dovalo a “Form reception email” in response, assigning her an identification code. She replied to the email, attaching the two statements of her first two purchase attempts, and also made a claim against her bank for reimbursement of one of the charges. The bank wanted to wait for a reply from Lufthansa, suggesting that she could file a claim on travel insurance available through her credit card if Lufthansa refused.

Dovalo might have escalated her complaint to executives of Lufthansa using the contact information on our website.

But, worried that Lufthansa would keep her waiting indefinitely for a response to her request, Dovalo posted in our forum about her case.

Our forum advocates advised Dovalo to write letters to Lufthansa’s customer service and executives, explaining what happened and requesting a refund for one set of tickets. Unfortunately, Lufthansa rejected her request, reiterating that she did not cancel her reservations within the 24-hour window and pointing out that her tickets were nonrefundable. The forum members suggested to Dovalo that she hadn’t presented her case properly to Lufthansa’s agents and that the delay in checking her email for the confirmations hurt her case. Dovalo then turned to our advocacy team for assistance.

Related story:   Her credit card didn't run. Whose fault is that?

Lufthansa’s general conditions of carriage” provide that to change tickets,

Should you wish to change any aspect of your transportation you must contact us in advance. The fare for your new transportation will be calculated and you will be given the

option of accepting the new price or maintaining your original transportation as ticketed.

But this provision assumes that the tickets are refundable, which Dovalo’s were not.

Lufthansa also posts terms and conditions for the use of its website. But nowhere in the general conditions of carriage or the terms and conditions does it guarantee that information provided by the website is correct (it carries a disclaimer for information posted by third parties) or address  instances of duplicate or near-duplicate reservations caused by glitches such as Dovalo experienced.

So the lack of any language addressing the consequences of glitches in the online booking process, together with the nonrefundability of Dovalo’s tickets and her delay in checking her email, pose some doubt that any attempts by our advocacy team to assist Dovalo will succeed in securing her a refund for the extra reservations.

On the other hand, the whole business was the result of Lufthansa’s website incorrectly advising her that the original booking was rejected. And its agents’ first informing her “not to worry” followed by accusatory treatment compound the poor customer service stemming from that rejection.

Jennifer Finger

Jennifer is the founder of KeenReader, an Internet-based freelance editing operation, as well as a certified public accountant. She is a senior writer for

  • Reporter1

    So this says, “Should I take the case?” However, there’s no option to answer that question because there is no question at the end of the post.

  • Annie M

    And what is this asking? I think you should help her.

  • Bill___A

    This is a common sense issue – of which Lufthansa is displaying none. Please help her and also Lufthansa should note that they need to apply some common sense to their “rule”. Do they think this is going to help their brand by doing something like this? It just makes them look bad, and it is very frustrating to deal with a company that is inflexible like that. Would Lufthansa like passengers to treat them that way if the situation were reversed? I don’t think so.

  • AAGK

    I maintain this should be an easy case but no one, including the OP, will change her position with the airline. She called to cancel within 24 hours (the call where the agent mentioned “not real” charges). That was the 24 hour cancellation call and that the OP won’t explain this to Luft and will only talk about the glitch and the bank, suggests this call never occurred. Instead she focused on this 5 day later call.
    If that 1st call occurred then she is entitled to a refund, even if she didn’t say the magic words.

  • Alan Gore

    Like British, Lufthansa is on my “use with caution” list of system carriers, and in Lufthansa’s case it’s because they never under any circumstances apply common sense in resolving a problem. It’s all about Zee Rules, my way or the autobahn.

  • Harvey-6-3.5

    Hopefully you can help and Lufthansa will listen.

  • greg watson

    Take the case, although something smells fishy.

  • Bill___A

    Yeah upon further thought, something does sound fishy. I have used the Lufthansa site several times without any such problems. However, they should be able to do something and maybe the OP should use the phone or a travel agent in the future.

  • Hanope

    How does someone not check their email for five days? Do you leave your mail sitting on the table unopened and don’t look at it for five days?

  • michael anthony

    Absolutely! Life is busy and we all have weeks where work is a bear. When the majority of email is not urgent and sales oriented, I don’t dash in every day to read it. Likewise with the US Mail. 95% of it is usually tossed and if it’s a bill, most people generally know that the bill isn’t due the next day. Many people, myself included, will wait until I have time and do it all at once.

    In this case, you may fault for not checking email daily, but after being reassured by both parties, I would have waited a few days and checked with bank first. I’m booking with BA, I’ve found the tickets charged to the bank as pending, then disappear, then show up 5 days later as paid. It makes no sense at all,

  • Nathan Witt

    At some point, you have to be able to rely on what a business tells you. Yes, there are rules about whether tickets can be canceled, but this is not a case about someone having full information about the fare rules and wanting to be exempt. This is a case where the success of the transaction was unclear, and the OP relied upon what she was told by Lufthansa, first by its website and then by its customer service agent. Both turned out to be incorrect, and she wants them to fix it. This really isn’t a situation where the “rules” are at issue.

  • cscasi

    Is there a last paragraph missing here? Did you try to advocate for her and fail? Did you put this in the “closed” file as being unable to help? What?

  • Hanope

    Well, if you know you recently purchased or tried to purchase airline tickets and imputed your email, and then you don’t check it for 5 days, that’s on you. Its easy enough to do a quick review of your inbox at least once a day. If she had checked her email even once to make sure she got the ‘confirmation of purchase’ email to make sure names/dates were all correct (which everyone should do), she would have seen the others as well.

    And IMO, most email (that is not sales oriented) is somewhat urgent. That’s why its sent email and not snail mail. Certainly for work, I’m expected to respond to emails promptly, which doesn’t mean letting them sit for over day (without good reason), let alone five. I treat my personal email the same way.

Get smart. Sign up for the newsletter.