What’s up with Interval International’s timeshare “upgrade fees per unit”?

By | August 13th, 2016

Charles Cummings says he and his fellow owners at Interval International are being charged “upgrade fees per unit” of $99 without warning.

Can timeshare companies do that?

And what do these extras cover? Do the companies have any responsibility to give their members a heads-up on new fees or any information about their purpose?

Cummings isn’t looking for a refund for the fees. He contacted our forum advocates to ask these questions and to warn other Interval members, current and potential, about these upgrade fees.

Interval, an operating division of Interval Leisure Group, is a timeshare company based in Miami, with a network of more than 3,000 resorts in more than 80 countries. According to its website, “Interval provides its members — vacation owners from around the world — with comprehensive exchange services and a variety of other exciting benefits that offer value and convenience at home and on the road.”

Timeshares, including Interval, issue “points” to their owners, as opposed to deeds to the properties. The owners are supposed to be able to use these points to stay at any resort operated by the timeshare company and are responsible for maintenance and property taxes.

Participation in an Interval timeshare involves acquiring an initial Interval membership and a “Vacation Interest,” which is defined in Interval’s Buyer’s Guide as “possessory rights, occupancy rights, or usage rights in accommodations and related facilities for a period of time during any given year.” An Interval member in good standing is then eligible to participate in Interval’s “Exchange Program,” in which members request and make deposits to confirm accommodations at Interval’s resorts.

Related story:   Of course they're scams, but how do you end them?

On June 26, Interval instituted unit-size upgrade fees with no notice and no explanation. Interval members who were trying to exchange timeshares found themselves paying $99 per unit for each additional room added to their booking. A member trading up from a studio to a three-bedroom unit would be billed an extra $297 [sic] (the actual exchange fee of $179 plus the $99 upgrade fee) [plus an unexplained difference of $11].

According to Yvette Battalla, a spokeswoman for Interval, the following notice was posted in a forum on Interval’s website in response to complaints about the fees:

We have heard your concerns and apologize for not providing advance notice about the new unit-size upgrade fee. We assure you that we will improve our communications in the future.

Prior to launching this fee, we reviewed data and conducted member research to better understand member behavior and inventory utilization. We learned that members often confirm larger units than are necessary to accommodate their travel party.

This finding, along with the fact that points-based members already relinquish more points when receiving a larger unit, the trend toward shorter booking windows, and other factors, influenced the introduction of the unit-size upgrade fee. As always, if a unit-size upgrade is offered during Flexchange, there is no additional fee. [Flexchange is a service offered by Interval for vacation exchange requests within 59 days of the desired dates of stays.]

The unit-size upgrade fee supports Interval’s commitment to providing comparable exchanges to members around the world. Our inventory control and optimization processes are designed to create the greatest number of exchange opportunities possible for members, while maintaining fairness across the system.

According to this notice, Interval is charging more for upgrades because it found that its members are confirming larger units than it thinks they need. A family of four might be confirming bookings and paying for three-bedroom units, only to be charged the upgrade fee because Interval thinks they only need two bedrooms. But since when is it up to a company, even a vacation rental company, to decide for its customers what their needs are? Shouldn’t the company be listening to its customers explaining their needs and working to accommodate them?

And neither the notice nor anything else on Interval’s site indicates exactly what the fees cover. Are they being used to pay higher utility bills or for renovations to common areas? Do they cover higher salaries, benefits and perks for employees of Interval? We don’t know — and more importantly, neither do the members.

In addition to the lack of transparency about why these fees were imposed, the lack of advance notice to Interval’s members that they would be charged these fees is troubling. Interval’s Buyer’s Guide indicates that:

All fees may be increased from time to time by II [Interval International], at its sole discretion. Members will be advised of any such increases through II’s regular publications or on II’s website, IntervalWorld.com.

This provision notwithstanding, Interval should have notified its members about the upgrade fee prior to invoicing them for their stays, and it needs to be specific about what those fees actually cover. If its inventory of larger units is smaller than its members are confirming, then it should adjust its marketing and clearly indicate how many units are available rather than second-guessing its members’ needs.

What we have here is a failure to communicate – and Interval’s customers are the ones paying for it.

Should timeshare companies be legally required to communicate to their members reasonable notice of the assessment and an explanation of the purpose of additional fees?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

  • mbods2002

    I would definitely challenge this if I were a timeshare owner of Interval properties. I see no difference in what they did vs my apartment complex adding a new, unexplained fee to my rent next month..surprise! I don’t think so…

  • AAGK

    In real life I’ve never encountered a time share but I hate them. However, in business it is not unusual for a company to monetize something they once did for free- think bag fees, etc, once they listen to the consumer and learn of its popularity. Similarly, if no one were booking hotel suites, the hotel would issue a promotion to attract folks. To the extent the company now wants to charge for something already granted in the contract it drafted, that’s a huge problem and it may not do this.

  • Annie M

    And? What’s the rest of the story? Do the owners have any recourse? Perhaps they are having issues with people booking 2 bedrooms and then inviting others to fill a third? But if there are no rules against how many people the owner can travel with, this would seem to be none of their business. Or perhaps they are getting complaints from others who need more bedrooms that they can’t get them?

    This is another reason why people really need to think before they buy a time share. They promise much at sales meetings but if it isn’t in writing it never happened. There should be full disclosures in any paperwork that buyers need to read about how they would be notified of price increases and what their legal rights are.

  • AAGK

    That’s smart. I didn’t think of it about the extra rooms thing. There was obviously an issue with the bookings, or they simply proved too popular. Like you say, it all goes back to the agreement.

  • El Dorado Hills

    The article above says that Interval will charge a $99.00 upgrade fee “per room” so going from a studio to a three bedroom unit, thus adding 3 rooms at $99.00 each, if your total of $297.00. If someone part of this program with Interval has to pay an exchange fee this would be on top of the upgrade fee. I know if you own a timeshare unit (deeded ownership) with another organization (as I do) and that organization works with Interval, you can transfer that week (or weeks) to Interval, bank them, and then use them later, up to so long in the future) to exchange for a unit someplace that Interval has in its inventory. There is an exchange fee for doing this. Whether or not the upgrade would apply in this situation I do not know.

  • Byron Cooper

    Interval came as a freebie with a timeshare we own. It is an exchange service whereby you can trade weeks from a timeshare you own for some other property. It is like RCI. I have never used it, but I just checked their website. They have numerous properties throughout the world that participate. It would be an option to use a week that I already paid for and go somewhere else. They do not own properties or timeshares and there are other exchange programs including RCI.

  • cscasi

    Thanks for mentioning that. If they read your comment, they just might considering adding that in the future. :-)

We want your feedback. Your opinion is important to us. Here's how you can share your thoughts:
  • Send us a letter to the editor. We'll publish your most thoughtful missives in our daily newsletter or in an upcoming post.
  • Leave a message on one of our social networks. We have an active Facebook page, a LinkedIn presence and a Twitter account. Every story on this site is posted on those channels. The conversation ranges from completely unmoderated (Twitter) to moderated (Facebook and LinkedIn).
  • Post a question to our help forums or ask our advocates for a hand through our assistance intake form. Please note that our help forum is not a place for debate. It's there primarily to assist readers with a consumer problem.
  • If you have a news tip or want to report an error or omission, you can email the site publisher directly. You may also contact the post's author directly. Contact information is in the author tagline.