“Is there anything I can do against the injustice?”

By | August 7th, 2016

After Daniela Martucci’s recent experience with Ford, she will probably never rent or purchase a Ford vehicle again. That’s because Ford apparently did everything in its power to drive her away as a customer.

First she says Ford leased her a bad car. Then it refused to pay for damage to the car that occurred while the car was in Ford’s care. And finally, it refused to cover the cost for the rental car Martucci was forced to use.

One month after Martucci leased a 2016 Ford Explorer Platinum, its transmission broke while Martucci was driving it from Miami to Orlando. The car was still under warranty. Ford’s Roadside Assistance service gave her a tow to the closest dealer, Tropical Ford in Orlando, where Martucci was told by a customer service representative that Tropical Ford would arrange for a rental car from Hertz to replace the Explorer while it was repaired.

The rental replacement car turned out to be a Ford Transit commercial use van — not a vehicle for personal use. And it had an exhaust problem. Martucci had to request a replacement for the rental vehicle — which turned out to be a Kia.

Martucci had to wait 27 days for her Explorer to be repaired. And when the Explorer was finally returned to Martucci, it had a dent in the rear passenger door and right rear wheel. According to written notation by the tow truck driver, Tropical Ford had told him that the dents were caused by the tow truck provided by Ford’s Roadside Assistance when it towed the Explorer to the dealership.

Related story:   What should we do about this adoption nightmare?

But Martucci had documentation from Tropical Ford indicating that there was no damage to the car other than the broken transmission — and she had never received any notification from Tropical Ford of any damage caused by the tow truck.

Ford refused to pay for the second rental car because it was not a Ford, and to take any responsibility for the damage caused by the tow truck.

According to Ford’s Warranty Guide for the 2016 Explorer, “You [the owner/lessee] will not be charged for repairs covered by any applicable warranty during the stated coverage periods, unless specifically stated elsewhere in this guide.” It also holds that

You may have some implied warranties. For example, you may have an implied warranty of merchantability (that the car or light truck is reasonably fit for the general purpose for which it was sold) or an implied warranty of fitness for a particular purpose (that the car or light truck is suitable for your special purposes), if a special purpose was specifically disclosed to Ford itself not merely to the dealer before your purchase, and Ford itself not just the dealer told you the vehicle would be suitable for that purpose.

These implied warranties are limited, to the extent allowed by law, to the time period covered by the written warranties, or to the applicable time period provided by state law, whichever period is shorter.

Thus, Martucci should have had an implied warranty that her Explorer was reasonably fit for general use, including a road trip from Miami to Orlando one month after she acquired the vehicle. Also, the warranty specifically covers repairs to the transmission and roadside assistance, including the cost of towing the vehicle to the nearest Ford dealership.

But the warranty continues with: “Ford does not assume or authorize anyone to assume for it any other obligation or liability in connection with your vehicle or these warranties.”

So Ford made Martucci a number of promises. But because there are different possible interpretations of the language Ford used in its warranty, it isn’t clear whether Ford will honor those promises or disclaim responsibility for any or all of them.

Under Florida’s Lemon Law, “if the manufacturer fails to conform the vehicle to the warranty after a reasonable number of attempts to repair these defects, the law requires the manufacturer to buy back the defective vehicle and give the consumer a purchase price refund or a replacement vehicle….If the manufacturer does not provide a refund or a replacement vehicle, consumers may invoke their rights through one or two arbitration programs.”

Since Martucci hasn’t received a new Ford Explorer or a refund, she could submit her dispute with Ford to a state-certified arbitration program in Florida. If the program doesn’t issue a ruling in 40 days or she isn’t satisfied with the program’s ruling, her next step would be to escalate her claim with Ford to the Florida New Motor Vehicle Arbitration Board, which is administered by the Florida Office of the Attorney General.

Martucci contacted our advocacy team to help her get reimbursement from Ford for the damage caused by the tow truck and for the rental car costs — as promised by Tropical Ford’s representative. And after everything she went through with Ford, that seems like the least they can do for her. As she asked us in her request for assistance, “Is there anything I can do against the injustice?”

Should we advocate with Ford for Daniela Martucci?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Update: After sending a certified letter and email to the CEO of Ford, Mark Fields, Martucci finally got a reply from his office. Ford will be paying for the repairs to Martucci’s Explorer and will send her a reimbursement check for the rental.

  • Bob Davis

    Bas ed on our experience with 2 successive Windstars this is Ford”s normal way of operation.

  • After moving to Europe and renewing my CA license the maximum number of times that was possible without returning to the DMV, my license expired. I have been without one for over ten years now and I am thrilled that I cannot drive, especially when reading stories like this. Sure, it limits me a bit, but we have been to 71 countries and never needed a car.

  • Altosk

    I had a terrible experience with Ford in 2000 and will NEVER buy another one of their junk products. I bought my first “brand new” car–a 2000 Ranger Truck. I had the thing maybe 3 months and the transmission blew. (It was an automatic; this bird doesn’t drive a stick).

    Had it towed to the dealer and told them I wanted a new transmission. They wanted to charge me…claimed it wasn’t under the bumper to bumper warranty. Long story short–I ended up getting them to buy back their POS after 3 months of arguing and going to state authorities.


  • Rebecca

    So a car that is 1 month old needs the transmission rebuilt? Am I reading that correctly? They took 27 days to fix it, and returned it with dents? I wouldn’t want the car fixed, I’d want my money back. There’s something wrong and it will never run right.

  • Steve

    The last Ford that I bought (in the 1990s), I had for 6 months when the water pump failed and the timing belt broke, at 16,000 miles. I traded that car in for a Chevy, and after driving it for a few months, the gas pedal broke off and there was just a metal rod sticking out of the bottom for me to step on to drive to the dealer for repairs. I traded that car in for a Honda Accord and have been driving Hondas, Toyotas and Subarus for years without any issues. Maybe the Fords are better now, but I won’t be checking them out.

  • DAVE

    I had an 89 Ford E-250 that died after only 225,000 miles and now a 98 E-250 that is still going at 280,000. I hope I never have to buy another Ford but I know this one won’t last forever

  • Carchar

    My daughter and son-in-law still own their first car, which was bought in 1987. It is a Honda Accord with over 300,000 miles on it.

  • NotThatBrooklynGuy

    So, the transmission is not somewhere between the bumpers???

  • DChamp56

    Not really enough information to go by here for me.

  • John Baker

    And I had a Toyota with a bad radio that took 3 months to get fixed… Not to mention the Toyota defect hiding scandal.

    Every brand has issues.

  • joycexyz

    Do you know what FORD means? Found On Road Dead.

  • scoosdad

    Fix Or Repair Daily?

  • Altosk

    That was my response to those idiots, too. XD

  • Tricia K

    We were all set to by a Ford Explorer last year after my cousin bought hers and loved it. Then I got my Consumer Reports magazine in the mail, where they not only said it wasn’t a good vehicle, but that they didn’t consider it reliable enough to endorse at the time. My cousin’s Explorer seems to be doing ok, but after battling Subaru for a new engine for my husband’s Legacy (it used over a quart of oil every thousand miles), I didn’t want to part with that kind of money to find ourselves in the same hole again. Does anybody make a reliable, dependable car or for that matter, do any of them care about their customers any more?

We want your feedback. Your opinion is important to us. Here's how you can share your thoughts:
  • Send us a letter to the editor. We'll publish your most thoughtful missives in our daily newsletter or in an upcoming post.
  • Leave a message on one of our social networks. We have an active Facebook page, a LinkedIn presence and a Twitter account. Every story on this site is posted on those channels. The conversation ranges from completely unmoderated (Twitter) to moderated (Facebook and LinkedIn).
  • Post a question to our help forums or ask our advocates for a hand through our assistance intake form. Please note that our help forum is not a place for debate. It's there primarily to assist readers with a consumer problem.
  • If you have a news tip or want to report an error or omission, you can email the site publisher directly. You may also contact the post's author directly. Contact information is in the author tagline.