<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Yuck! 5 most disgusting cruise ships in the world</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.elliott.org/blog/yuck-5-most-disgusting-cruise-ships-in-the-world/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.elliott.org/blog/yuck-5-most-disgusting-cruise-ships-in-the-world/</link>
	<description>Consumer advocate Christopher Elliott&#039;s site.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 05:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/blog/yuck-5-most-disgusting-cruise-ships-in-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-21469</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 19:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=7284#comment-21469</guid>
		<description>You included Pride of Aloha but it is no longer Pride of Aloha.  It was reflagged last year as Norwegian Sky and retested with a much higher score.

And you fail to mention that if they do fail the inspection, they must correct the deficiences and be reinspected.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You included Pride of Aloha but it is no longer Pride of Aloha.  It was reflagged last year as Norwegian Sky and retested with a much higher score.</p>
<p>And you fail to mention that if they do fail the inspection, they must correct the deficiences and be reinspected.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bela Fleck</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/blog/yuck-5-most-disgusting-cruise-ships-in-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-21362</link>
		<dc:creator>Bela Fleck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=7284#comment-21362</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not too impressed with the age of most of these reports.  Only one was more recent than 6 months ago.  Three of the five are a year or more old.  More than enough time to make corrections.  Show me recent inspections with these problems and I&#039;ll be more concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not too impressed with the age of most of these reports.  Only one was more recent than 6 months ago.  Three of the five are a year or more old.  More than enough time to make corrections.  Show me recent inspections with these problems and I&#8217;ll be more concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sheila</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/blog/yuck-5-most-disgusting-cruise-ships-in-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-21361</link>
		<dc:creator>Sheila</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 22:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=7284#comment-21361</guid>
		<description>When reviewing complete reports, I found myself wondering how you selected which violations to report.  Some of ones not included in your report seem much more serious to me and the number of incidents cited seem  more representative of the score then the ones in your report.  Are these inspections scheduled or unscheduled?  If scheduled, the violations are more serious - indicating poor preparation for an inspection (ie not taking inspections seriously).  If unscheduled, it&#039;s much harder to ensure compliance with all requirements given the number of employees (thousands) involved.  Not meaning to make excuses just being more objective than your headline  indicates</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When reviewing complete reports, I found myself wondering how you selected which violations to report.  Some of ones not included in your report seem much more serious to me and the number of incidents cited seem  more representative of the score then the ones in your report.  Are these inspections scheduled or unscheduled?  If scheduled, the violations are more serious &#8211; indicating poor preparation for an inspection (ie not taking inspections seriously).  If unscheduled, it&#8217;s much harder to ensure compliance with all requirements given the number of employees (thousands) involved.  Not meaning to make excuses just being more objective than your headline  indicates</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leigh</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/blog/yuck-5-most-disgusting-cruise-ships-in-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-21346</link>
		<dc:creator>Leigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=7284#comment-21346</guid>
		<description>These are just snippets, far from the full report.  If you actually click over to the report you&#039;ll see that several of them DO have insect and mold problems.  Remember too, that the report is focusing on the food service areas (storage, preparation, and serving).  This isn&#039;t an inspection of the entire ship!

I don&#039;t know what the CDC protocol is for inspecting cruise ships, but I *hope* that those with failing grades are re-inspected within a &#039;reasonable&#039; amount of time for corrections.  I wonder what action is taken if they fail again?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are just snippets, far from the full report.  If you actually click over to the report you&#8217;ll see that several of them DO have insect and mold problems.  Remember too, that the report is focusing on the food service areas (storage, preparation, and serving).  This isn&#8217;t an inspection of the entire ship!</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t know what the CDC protocol is for inspecting cruise ships, but I *hope* that those with failing grades are re-inspected within a &#8216;reasonable&#8217; amount of time for corrections.  I wonder what action is taken if they fail again?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Friday Round Up: Twitter Travel Edition &#124; Budget Travel Tips - EuroCheapo</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/blog/yuck-5-most-disgusting-cruise-ships-in-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-21336</link>
		<dc:creator>Friday Round Up: Twitter Travel Edition &#124; Budget Travel Tips - EuroCheapo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=7284#comment-21336</guid>
		<description>[...] Meanwhile, we couldn&#8217;t believe some of Christopher Elliot&#8217;s reports about the 5 most disgusting cruise ships in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Meanwhile, we couldn&#8217;t believe some of Christopher Elliot&#8217;s reports about the 5 most disgusting cruise ships in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.elliott.org/blog/yuck-5-most-disgusting-cruise-ships-in-the-world/comment-page-1/#comment-21333</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jul 2009 15:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.elliott.org/?p=7284#comment-21333</guid>
		<description>These inspections don&#039;t exactly sound like they uncovered a pit of festering filth do they? You hear a lot worse when they go into local restaurants, what with the flies, mould and rats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These inspections don&#8217;t exactly sound like they uncovered a pit of festering filth do they? You hear a lot worse when they go into local restaurants, what with the flies, mould and rats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

