Will the long airport lines of spring break 2016 be back again this year?

By | April 3rd, 2017

If you’re already bracing for a long airport security line during the spring break travel season, then you must remember last year.

You do, don’t you? That’s when Transportation Security Administration screening wait times doubled under the weight of tighter security and swelling crowds. On just one day in mid-March, 6,800 American Airlines customers reportedly missed their flights, thanks to the lengthy TSA lines.

The agency assigned to protect America’s transportation systems responded with a 10-point plan to speed up airport lines, and the lines abated by the end of the summer. During the winter holidays, the agency estimates that 99 percent of air travelers waited in security lines for less than half an hour and that 95 percent waited less than 15 minutes.

But with spring break 2017 in our sights, air travelers are wondering if history will repeat itself. And if there’s anything they can do to avoid getting stuck in line.

They’re air travelers like Beverly Byrum, a nurse from Louisville, who got a little preview of a worst-case scenario when she returned from a trip to Mexico through Atlanta in January.

“The immigration lines were 500 travelers deep, then another long line for TSA,” she says. “The anger in the crowd was growing. Many people missed connections.”

Although Byrum doesn’t entirely blame the TSA for the slowdown, she says it was a contributing factor. The TSA hasn’t announced any new efforts aimed directly at easing lines during the busy spring travel weeks. Then again, this is a different spring and there’s a new administration in Washington.

Related story:   "The woman seemed mad that we had made the reservation through Travelocity"

Change is definitely in the air. One of the solutions that could be quickly put into place if new lines crop up: private security screeners. “That has long been a GOP-backed solution for inefficiency in the security process,” says Anthony DeMaio, a lobbyist with O’Neill and Associates in Washington. He expects to see a renewed push for increased privatization of TSA screeners. Already, more than 20 airports participate in the TSA’s Screening Partnership Program, which allows private companies to conduct airport security screening.

Agency observers also expect a renewed push to promote TSA PreCheck, the agency’s expedited screening program. And while hyping the pricey program during a busy travel season may seem opportunistic, PreCheck’s advantages are undeniable.

Bryan Cunningham, who owns an aviation services company in Fort Lauderdale, Fla., and is a frequent air traveler, says PreCheck membership, which costs $85 for five years, is “absolutely, definitely” worth the money. TSA’s internal metrics indicate that 97 percent of passengers with PreCheck clearance waited less than five minutes in line during the last holiday period.


“When you’re checking in, it cuts the wait time down by 80 percent, compared to a conventional line,” Cunningham says. “Plus, you don’t have to take off your shoes or remove your computer most of the time.”

The benefits are especially clear to inbound international travelers, who can use a kiosk and bypass the lengthy lines after immigration — the same lines Byrum had to contend with in Atlanta.

The TSA says it is taking the threat of longer lines seriously. Although its plan to ease congestion, put in place almost a year ago, has worked so far, “we continue to expand on some of the initiatives,” says Bruce Anderson, a TSA spokesman. For example, the agency plans to utilize overtime and expedite the hiring of screeners this spring. It also plans to deploy more K-9 teams and, over the long term, to invest in research and development in technologies that will speed up screening.

Related story:   Grade the Transportation Security Administration -- you know you want to!

Will it be enough? Kevin Mitchell, who runs the Business Travel Coalition, an advocacy group in Radnor, Pa., that represents corporate travel managers, thinks we may be headed for a replay of spring break 2016 unless more is done quickly. In fact, he wants the National Guard deployed during the busy air travel weeks to help move things along.

The only thing that would permanently reduce the lines is to remove the clutter — specifically, the carry-on bags passengers try to drag through the screening area in an effort to avoid checked-baggage fees.

“To encourage travelers to check bags and reduce the number of items TSA agents need to inspect, Congress should pass legislation that would require airlines to temporarily reduce baggage fees by 50 percent,” Mitchell says.

That’s a long shot, but Congress has an opportunity to do just that in the upcoming Federal Aviation Administration Reauthorization Bill. While it may be too late for this year, there’s always spring break 2018.

Until then, passengers flying in March and early April should consider arriving at the airport at least a half-hour earlier than they normally would. “If you can, fly during nonpeak hours, and check your bags,” advises Paul Hudson, the executive director of Flyersrights.org, a nonprofit organization that advocates for air travelers.

Unlike last spring break, the TSA, airlines and their passengers are flying into this busy travel period fully aware of what could happen. And if all goes as planned, the screening experience will be the least memorable part of your vacation.

Related story:   I had a panic attack and it ruined my honeymoon


  • tim scales

    Small inaccuracy in the article – the kiosks you can use to avoid the lines in immigration are for travelers who have Global Entry; if all you have is PreCheck, you’re stuck in the cattle chutes with everyone else. Global Entry includes PreCheck, but is a separate program (if you travel internationally, you’re better off spending a few extra dollars for Global Entry).

  • Alan Gore

    How long is this going to go on, anyway? I thought spring break was already over for this year.

  • Hanope

    Whether to get PreCheck or Global Entry definitely depends on your ‘most often’ flying needs. For example, if most of your flighs are domestic and you have kids, Precheck may be better because you don’t have to pay for the kids (under 13). Global Entry must be obtained for each person, even kids.

  • ctporter

    I flew from a small regional airport on Friday, sadly, the passenger in front of me had no clue. Her checked bag was overweight so the she had removed several items from her checked bag and put them in her carryon. Unfortunately what she removed were several bottles of liquids all well over the 3.4oz limit. She ended up having to toss out all the liquids (full size bottles of moisturizers, shampoos, conditioners, etc) in order to get through security. An expensive lesson as her checked bag was already under airport control and a long wait to get through security for all the rest of us. Just one passenger can make moving through a security line much longer than normal.

  • Jeff W.

    The spring break for college students may have come and gone, but grade/high school breaks (when some families take their vacations) marches on.

    Ours was last week. I know some school districts are this week. Then there are some that wait for the week following Easter. First week of March thru mid-April is a good rule of thumb

  • PsyGuy

    Private Security Screeners? Isn’t that what we had before TSA, and then someone flew some planes into buildings> I remember that time, they wore red jackets and ties that kind of matched the airline, and they were paid by the airline. I miss those days.
    Thirty minutes, no plan an extra hour to get through security during peak demand.

  • PsyGuy

    Depends on the cost of the bottles, but you can get big bottles of conditioner lotion etc, for under $5. It’s very likely it wasn’t that expensive of a lesson.

  • PsyGuy

    Depends on the schools and colleges. It’s actually about 6 weeks long.

  • PsyGuy

    I have Global Entry, LOVE IT.

  • ctporter

    trust me, what she threw out was not your cheap drug store brands, I felt for her as I recognized what she was tossing out. She was in tears (silent though, trying NOT to aggravate security), but it was not as costly as what I saw years ago, with a group of young women having to toss out VERY expensive perfumes (over $100 each). The weirdest thing I ever saw though, was a HUGE bottle of laundry detergent!

  • michael anthony

    Two things I’ve been thinking about regarding TSA.

    1. With the new ban on electronics onboard on flights from certain countries. It’s because of reported new advances in bomb making that allows a bomb being put into electronics that escapes detection by scanners used at pax screening. If an attempt was made, I can see the Feds changing the policy to more locations and in the US, TSA Precheck included.

    2. Inconsistency: Shoes allowed to be on thru TSA at ORD, but not in MSP. There was confusion at MSP because of this, so ORD wasn’t the only airport allowing shoes. End result? Lines long at MSP and bunched up at the scanner area. (The same Airport that TSA thought 2 checkpoints were better than 3)

  • joycexyz

    How irritating! Where has that clueless woman been hiding all these years? Newspapers and magazines have long been full of articles describing the TSA process. Perhaps people like her need to go to the back of the line.

  • joycexyz

    Ah, yes. Privatization rears its ugly head. Equates to poorly paid and poorly vetted.

  • joycexyz

    That electronics ban is nothing short of insane. Does it really matter whether something blows up in the passenger section vs in the cargo hold???

  • PsyGuy

    Don’t forget poorly trained, poorly supervised, and a lot of other poorly’s.

  • PsyGuy

    That is weird? The weirdest I ever saw was a 1.5L bottle of mouthwash.

We want your feedback. Your opinion is important to us. Here's how you can share your thoughts:
  • Send us a letter to the editor. We'll publish your most thoughtful missives in our daily newsletter or in an upcoming post.
  • Leave a message on one of our social networks. We have an active Facebook page, a LinkedIn presence and a Twitter account. Every story on this site is posted on those channels. The conversation ranges from completely unmoderated (Twitter) to moderated (Facebook and LinkedIn).
  • Post a question to our help forums or ask our advocates for a hand through our assistance intake form. Please note that our help forum is not a place for debate. It's there primarily to assist readers with a consumer problem.
  • If you have a news tip or want to report an error or omission, you can email the site publisher directly. You may also contact the post's author directly. Contact information is in the author tagline.