Why doesn’t travel insurance cover dad’s illness?

January 26, 2012

When Jessica Kamzik’s father was diagnosed with stomach cancer last summer, there was no question about what she had to do. Dad’s prognosis was “grave” — the doctors said he probably wouldn’t make it to the holidays — and, “as any loving daughter would do, I immediately cancelled our vacation to stay closer to him,” she says.

Good thing she had travel insurance through Access America, she thought. At least she wouldn’t have to worry about losing the cost of her trip.

But she thought wrong.

Kamzik make a claim on her policy, confident that it would help her recover the $1,400 she’d spent on her vacation. After all, her travel insurance covered the “illness of a family member” and specifically one that “is considered life threatening or requiring hospitalization” — which is what her father’s illness was.

But Access America didn’t see it that way.

She explains,

They refused to pay based on what they say is a “pre-existing” condition. They made this claim based on a doctor’s note that was first sent in, which stated that my father had symptoms two months prior to when he was diagnosed.

Their insurance policy says that if the client had symptoms 120 days prior to when the policy was bought (July 19th 2011), the refund was void.

Now, I understood this, so asked for verification from his doctor. His doctor sent in all the notes, explicitly stating that my father was very healthy prior to his cancer, and that any symptoms he had were not necessarily related to cancer.

Yet, the travel insurance company still refuses to refund our money.

As I reviewed her case and examined the fine print in her contract, I thought Access America was taking a very narrow view of what constituted a “pre-existing” condition. Had her father been diagnosed with cancer, or had his doctor’s suspected he had cancer and were in the process of testing him for it when she bought the policy, then they’d have a valid reason for denying her claim.

But stomach pain? I get that whenever I eat grandma’s spaghetti (but it’s a good kind of pain). Is my travel insurance going to deny a claim because I had a little heartburn? I thought this was worth bringing to Access America’s attention. Maybe one of its adjusters had failed to see the big picture.

Access America reviewed its decision. Here’s what it had to say:

We are very sorry that Ms. Kamzik’s father is ill and we wish him and his family the best. We had our claims department investigate the status of Ms. Kamzik’s claim.

The travel insurance policy that Ms. Kamzik purchased excludes claims for existing medical conditions. Existing medical conditions are defined as any illness occurring to a family member during the 120 days prior to and including the effective date of the purchased insurance for which: a) medical diagnosis or treatment by a Physician has been sought or advised or for which symptoms exist, which would cause a prudent person to seek diagnosis, care or treatment.

A review of Ms. Kamzik’s father’s physician’s notes from July 28 indicate that he had constant stomach pain for the past one and a half months. As these symptoms of illness occurred within 120 days of Ms. Kamzik’s purchase of her travel insurance policy, any subsequent claim based on a stomach illness or condition would be excluded from coverage.

I’m very sorry that we could not cover Ms. Kamzik in this situation, but we do wish her the best in her future travels.

That’s really too bad. I asked Kamzik for her reaction.

That’s disappointing. I will continue to fight this, however, because I believe that Access America will do everything they can to scam buyers out of their money.

They already gave me this answer (multiple times), so I went back to each of my father’s doctors and had them confirm that my father’s symptoms were not related to his current condition (a terminal illness). Even with both doctors backing me up, Access America refuses to do the right thing.

I’m moving Kamzik’s case into my “dismissed” file, but I’m not happy, either. Too many travelers are getting snagged by what seems to be a strict interpretation of the pre-existing conditions clause. It’s definitely something to be aware of the next time you buy travel insurance.

(Photo: Free and happy/Flickr)

  • Anonymous

    The doctors don’t say that the symptoms aren’t related to the cancer, they say the symptoms aren’t NECESSARILY related the cancer. If they didn’t think they were related, they’d say so. 

  • Anonymous

    Who sold her the Access America Travel Insurance?

    If you buy an airline ticket [or vacation package] through an Online Travel Agency (OTA), you’ll probably get an opt-in box for travel insurance. The problem is that this is usually the worst policy to buy.

    When human travel agents (TAs) quote travel insurance, they have to enter the State, Date of Birth, Travel, Purchase and Deposit Dates and purchase price, etc. Only after these are entered will the quotes for different kinds of policies come out. The cost of the policy is so dependent on the age of the insured (especially above 60). Most of the plans sold
    by regular TAs often have pre-existing medical condition waivers if they are paid for in full within ~14-15 days. In addition, the TA will usually upsell the better plans if the passenger needs them.

    However, the OTA websites obviously don’t have the time to interview the passenger so IMO they just sell the cheapest [and most profitable] plans. IMO they don’t even take into consideration the age of the passenger [even if they ask for it for the TSA's Secure Flight Data]. So, because of this wholesale “click the box” approach to selling travel insurance, there is a huge chance the passenger is not buying the correct insurance.

    Also I noticed that “bundled” travel protection or insurance plans usually have the same “defect”. Take the case of that 78 year old lady who bought the Vantage India tour with the Tripmate travel protection. Linda Bator made an excellent recommendation – call your travel insurance first whenever you have a problem. If the passenger bought insurance from TravelGuard, she could have called 24/7 and use their Emergency Travel Assistance to rebook her flights . I checked Tripmate’s website, while they offer a 24/7 One Call Solution, it does not say they will help rebook your flights.

    http://www.tripmate.com/Tmwebsite/index.php/c_main/ProdPg#

    So the 78 year old lady hit a dead end. Vantage didn’t answer their phones and even if she called Tripmate, they might not offer flight re-bookings. No wonder she just went back home to FLL.
     
    The lesson learned here is that not all sellers of travel insurance will offer the travel insurance you need. Next time talk to a human being who sells a good one.

  • Anonymous

    In the insurance company’s reply after reviewing the denial…

    “A review of Ms. Kamzik’s father’s physician’s notes from July 28 indicate that he had constant stomach pain for the past one and a half months.”

  • Anonymous

    “A review of Ms. Kamzik’s father’s physician’s notes from July 28
    indicate that he had constant stomach pain for the past one and a half
    months.”

    1 1/2 months of constant stomach pain in an otherwise-healthy man for which no other diagnosis was ever found (stress, gastric reflux, ulcer due to a bacterial infection, celiac disease, whatever…) it sounds quite reasonable to connect it to a diagnosis of stomach cancer soon afterwards.

    And exactly who would be suing the doctor if they stated the stomach pain was unrelated to the cancer?  And what would the doctor be sued for?

    Neither the insurance company nor the policyholder has to prove anything 100%.  But it sounds like here where the doctor states: “It wasn’t necessarily related” sounds like it was more likely to be connected than not.

  • Anonymous

    I always suspected that travel insurance was a big rip off.

  • Anonymous

    A headache could be brain cancer, but a prudent person cannot be expected to think that way.  

    It’s unreasonable to deny a claim solely with the benefit of hindsight when the doctors wouldn’t make the connection you’re suggesting with foresight, and EVEN WITH THE BENEFIT OF HINDSIGHT they’re still not convinced that there was a connection.

  • Linda Barbone

    Hold on a minute.  When I bought travel insurance I thought that “preexisting conditions” referred to MY preexisting conditions.  Do I now have to be concerned about the preexisting conditions of my immediate family members?  Sheesh.  How about old age?  Is that considered a preexisting condition? 

  • Anonymous

    Still not buying it.

    My mother’s colon cancer came with not a lick of lower abdominal pain that couldn’t didn’t actually come from pre-existing conditions she had.  Because it stayed small in her colon and metastasized like wildfire.Her particular cancer was such a monster that a routine abdominal scan 16 months before her diagnosis (a regular scan done to check on one of those pre-existing conditions) showed a clear abdomen. When they diagnosed it, the same type of scan showed her abdomen was utterly filled.  The worst pain she had came from the metastasis; her right shoulder that gave her pain – her liver had been nearly doubled in size and the utter weight of it was pulling down on all the muscular structure of her shoulders.  That’s ALWAYS the first place you look for colon cancer.  *snort*

    It must be nice to sit back, look at a medical history and say “Oh, well, yeah, NOW it’s obvious s/he had cancer.”  But when you’re in the middle of a diagnostic process (which could take as long as six weeks with the state of the US healthcare system), it’s utter BS to day “sorry, it’s pre-existing”.  Real-life medicine is not an episode of “ER” or “House”; real medicine is filled with things that have to be ruled out.

    It hadn’t been diagnosed by a medical professional.  Medical professionals admit they were slow to diagnose.  That should be enough.

  • Anonymous

    That’s NOT what the doctors said. What they said was that the symptoms “were not necessarily related to the cancer” (thereby not ruling out that they were). The daughter’s the one who says they were unrelated.

  • Anonymous

    Re-read my post.  

    They’ll never be able to definitively say otherwise.  

    The body is very inter-connected.  Swollen toes might foreshadow a stroke or heart attack.

  • Anonymous

    Pre-existing condition exclusions aren’t written that way.  If you see a physician for symptoms, or experience symptoms that would cause a prudent person to seek care, a later diagnosis that can be reasonably connected to those symptoms is excluded.  (It has to be reasonable, not 100% certain.)

    It doesn’t matter what you thought could be the cause at the time; if the eventual diagnosis (that causes you to file a claim) can be reasonably connected to the earlier symptoms, than the earlier symptoms are excluding.

    Again, this is NOT unique to trip insurance, this is how pre-ex exclusions work.

  • Anonymous

    Then the policies  are worthless.

    Unless you get hit by a bus,  practically every illness was foreshadowed with the benefit of hindsight.

  • Anonymous

    But the doctors aren’t “not making the connection”. What they’re  admitting is that other things COULD have caused the pain, not that the cancer didn’t. If the doctors were 99% sure teh pain came from the cancer, their statement is still valid.

  • Anonymous

    Hence the reason why Chris should have an
    AskAdvocateElliott site [or section].

    We keep on discussing all these problems AFTER they happen. How about preventing a couple of them from happening by simply being smart and buying or doing the right things? How about a guide, Chris?

  • Helena Kurpaska

    You may be correct, but I’m curious about whether you’ve ever had the opportunity (if you call it that) to test what you, versus the insurance company thinks is covered? Really, the Devil is in the details. I had a policy with the late, but not lamented Trip Assured several years ago, and I thought that I was fully covered in the event that my Mother’s health deteriorated…until my Mother passed away, and Trip Assured disagreed with my right to claim reimbursement.

  • Anonymous

    You ‘thought’ or you ‘know’?  Did you read your policy before posting?  Does it have preexisting coverage just for your or for family members as noted in the policy?  Did you call the insurance company before you purhcased the policy and ask questions? After the purchase is not when you start to question your coverage.

  • Anonymous

    Unfortunately, her doctor’s first note stated he already had suffered from stomach pain for a month and a half, and was then diagnosed with stomach cancer.  To then turn around and say the stomach pains had nothing to do with the cancer would not be very truthful, and does lay the groundwork for a pre-existing condition.  That’s why we sell insurance with a waiver for pre-existing conditions.  I have asthma, and if my medication even changes 120 days prior, all bets are off.  Insurance is stringent, and why they follow up with doctors (who is the one who sent in the original notes to them).  I am sorry to hear about cases like this, but she may not have had the right policy, or waited too long to take it out, in which case all pre-existing conditions will apply.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_SYR4YYOAPY4X3UUYLPCADARF3Q emanon256

    So it’s the insurance company saying it was constant for 1.5 months.  Not Chris’s client.
     
    I have a few doctors in the family and their malpractice insurance policies forbid them from ever saying anything with certainty or they will not be covered should they be sued as a result.  If the doctor says the stomach pain is not related, the travel insurance company could sue the Dr. for making an absolute statement.  Or the OP could sue the insurance company and the Dr. will be subpoenaed.  Ask any Dr. and I guarantee you they will tell you that they will never write a note that says anything with absolute certainty.  They will only use words like not necessarily related, or most likely related.  Those are how they say yes and no.  Not necessary means more than likely not, most likely means, probably related.

  • Anonymous

    The exclusions are there for a reason:  What the insurance company doesn’t want to happen (because it’s very expensive and would drive up premiums):  Previously-healthy [Relative] has been bedridden with weakness for the past week and heart disease runs in the family… while it COULD just be the flu, let me go and purchase a trip insurance policy today before she goes to the doctor tomorrow, because she might be diagnosed with a heart condition. 

    This is called “adverse selection” and if not prevented, makes insurance so expensive as to be unaffordable (since it’d be too expensive for healthy policyholders to want to purchase.)

    If a reasonable (if not certain) connection can be made between symptoms serious enough to seek medical treatment and a later serious diagnosis, then it is excluded.  Certainty is required for neither the insurance company nor the policyholder.  (i.e. If you sprain your ankle, and then later suffer from a heart attack, while it’s theoretically possible that the two are connected, it’s not reasonable to exclude on that basis.)  1 1/2 months of otherwise-unexplained stomach pain CAN be reasonably connected to a later diagnosis of cancer.

    The thing is, if you (or somebody in your family) is in poor health, it is literally trivial, and often free, to avoid pre-ex exclusions with trip insurance.

    All you have to do is be able to travel on the day you buy the policy, purchase the policy within a certain window, and cover your whole trip.  The purchase time limits limit adverse selection enough to keep the premiums reasonable.

  • Anonymous

    And let’s be honest — a month and a half of constant pain, and you don’t think one thing applied to the other?  How do you think the doctors FOUND the stomach cancer – they went looking for it based on the symptoms.  This is an unfortunate case!

  • Anonymous

    I think all insurance is a rip off but it seems to be a fact of life in today’s world.  With travel insurance, purchasing ‘the right’ coverage is very important.  Do your homework before hand as after the fact you are SOL.

  • Anonymous

    Which contradicts the note the physician sent in referring to the pre-existing stomach pains for over a month and a half.  Not a single incident, but ongoing.  That lays the groundwork for pre-existing condition.  Heart disease, asthma or diabetes conditions which have had changes in treatment within that 120 days ALSO qualifies for pre-ex.  That’s why I don’t believe she had a pre-ex waiver on her insurance, or this would not have been an issue.

  • Anonymous

    But the terms of the coverage DO say laying a groundwork for pre-ex is any treatment sought out, and /or change in treatment or medication.  As an asthma patient whose medications have changed several times, I am well aware of this, and ensure I immediately take out insurance with a pre-ex waiver.

  • Anonymous

    But seeking treatment for over a month and a half of CONSTANT stomach pain, and then being diagnosed with STOMACH cancer is not the same a single incident.  She purchased the wrong coverage in this case, and since the doctors thought enough of the original pains to include it in their report, it is reasonable to assume they thought there might be a link.

  • Anonymous

    *sigh* This is all such BS.  It’s like if anyone in your family is sick with anything, you can’t get trip insurance.  

    My in-laws are planning a brief trip to WDW with my brother-in-law and his kids in March.  My MIL was thinking she would buy trip insurance, because the elderly relative they live with (but who isn’t going on the trip) could conceivably get sick.  Reading up on it, we convinced her it probably wasn’t worth it, as I’m sure they could just pore over the medical history of the relative and call anything pre-existing.  When you’re 90, just about anything is pre-existing.

    Maybe you should just appeal to decency and common sense.  That worked when my mother got sick (well, halfway – NWA completely refunded fares my parents had bought a week or two before her diagnosis without hesitation and well-wishes for my mother’s health; the same act shamed UA into doing the same after they first offered vouchers, despite the fact my mother probably wouldn’t be able to fly ever again).  Bureaucracy will always find a box to check to protect their derrière.

  • Anonymous

    :)  And I have sold TravelGuard and TravelEx and seem them cover all SORTS of claims – from missed flights, missed connections, catch up flights for a cruise, changes due to a need to return home when a loved one fell ill, medical evacuations and even re-patriation of remains with a death abroad.  But a lot of claims are for lost or delayed baggae, stolen or lost items, etc.  So NOT all travel insurance is the scam most folks here think it is – it is just that some folks do not purchase the correct poliy, or utilize the company as soon as there is a problem.  I really feel sorry for this lady and her father. 

  • Anonymous

    I did re-read your post and I think you’re making an assumption for which facts aren’t evident. You say the doctors aren’t convinced there was a connection but there’s no proof of this. They may very well be convinced yet still have to admit that there exists the possibility of other or additional causes for the pain. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

    Unless you are a doctor, you cannot state that stomach pains are related to stomach cancer.  Is that how doctors determine that someone has stomach cancer. I don’t know, and I’m sure you don’t either.

    The OP stated that , ” I went back to each of my father’s doctors and had them confirm that my
    father’s symptoms were not related to his current condition (a terminal
    illness).”

    IF that is true then we should abide by the doctor’s opinions, and not try to play physician.

    If I were the OP I would sue and attach the doctor’s note as evidence.

  • Anonymous

    “anyone” is defined in each policy under family members.  If the family member type isn’t listed, then no, coverage would not be applicable.  But if the family member type is listed, taking a policy out ‘within’ the allowed time for pre-exisiting coverage would work.  Now many policies are priced based on the amount of the travel paid and age. As we get older, these policies can get very expensive.

  • Anonymous

    No, it’s the doctor’s notes saying it’s constant for 1.5 months. 

    And in my experience when a doctor says “not necessarily”, they usually follow it up with “but to be on the safe side” which indicates (to me) belief. When they say “not likely”, they’re trying to convince me against a course of action. But I’m guessing that varies from doctor to doctor.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_OEPJGQPIEB75YYDE5CJY6R3VFE Carver Clark Farrow II

    AB

    That’s not how you should read the language.  Pre-existing is defined.  It doesn’t matter if the cancer existed beforehand, but rather did he seek treatment for cancer or some indicia of cancer.  He did not, he sought treatement for stomach pains, which the OP stated her doctors said is unrelated to the cancer.

  • Anonymous

    My MIL was thinking she would buy trip insurance, because the elderly relative they live with (but who isn’t going on the trip) could conceivably get sick.

    The elderly relative must be a Family Member as described in the policy. Example (from TravelGuard)…

    “Family Member” means the Insured’s or Traveling
    Companion’s spouse, Domestic Partner, Child, daughter-in-law, son-in-law, brother, sister, mother, father, grandparents, grandchild, step-child, step-brother, step-sister, step-parents, parents-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, aunt, uncle, niece, nephew, legal guardian, Caregiver, foster child, ward, or legal ward, or spouse or Domestic Partner of any of the above.

    Usually (better check), if the Insured must cancel or interrupt his/her Trip due to Injury or Sickness of a Family Member not traveling with the Insured, it must be because their condition is lifethreatening, as certified by a Physician or because they require the Insured’s care.

    Generally, if the 2 above conditions are met, and she buys a travel insurance policy that waives pre-existing medical conditions, then cancellation and trip interruption will protect her.

  • Anonymous

    Who sold you your travel insurance? Online probably?

  • Anonymous

    If you read the first statement from the OP you’ll see that she states the doctor’s note indicated that the symptoms “were not necessarily related to cancer”. It’s only in her response to the insurance company’s second denial that she says the doctors say the symptoms and cancer are entirely unrelated. Since it sounds as if she’s changing the details of the story to make it more favorable to her side, I’m more inclined to believe her first statement and that a month and a half’s constant stomach pain for which he sought treatment is, indeed, an indica of cancer.

  • Anonymous

    Re-quoting:

    I went back to each of my father’s doctors and had them confirm that my father’s symptoms were not related to his current condition (a terminal illness).

  • Anonymous

    You’re making several assumptions that are not grounded in Chris’ article.

  • Anonymous

    Which was her response to their second denial. Her story has changed to suit her side. 

  • Anonymous

    Does anyone know of any case where someone developed a terminal illness, without any prior symptoms whatsoever that might be construed to be linked to the illness with the benefit of hindsight?

    I imagine it’s theoretically possible, but extraordinarily rare in practice.  

    How many people tend to be private about discussing their health in general, even with those who are close to them?  And doubly so when it comes to bringing attention to what are typically symptoms of very minor ailments?  

    Does Access America really expect their insured travelers to interrogate every single member of their family about every ache and pain before they plan a trip and take out a policy?  

    I understand that there are pre-existing condition waivers available.  

    In that case, how dare they sell policies that advertise family member illness protection without a pre-existing condition waiver?  If the pre-existing condition clauses are interpreted as narrowly as Access America interprets them in this case, then the clause is  practically worthless and no one would ever buy this insurance product if they actually understood how it would be interpreted.

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_BJF5ZSELUNU6HQJWYESV6AQTWA Linda Jordan

    This is an unfortunate circumstance and I can see both sides.  It is so hard to get through the fine print on travel insurance carriers only to be denied when needed.

    Side note:  I would like to know if there is a company that based on your travel plans can tell you which insurance carrier would be best for your needs.  There are people that can go over a hospital bill for you and find all kinds of unnecessary charges, so knowing all the different kinds of travel insurance’s available would be nice.  Is there such a “clearing house?”  I’ve used the website that Chris has available, but it is still difficult to get through all the fine print on each policy.

    I always buy insurance because you just never know and if my 79 year old mother is with us I want to make sure we have all the insurance needed in case of an emergency. 

  • Anonymous

    Although to be fair, hasn’t Chris done a series on how to buy travel insurance?

    Not to be snide, snarky, etc., but how do you imagine he’s going to answer the question:  “My dad’s been seeing the doctor for the past couple of months about his stomach pains.  How does that affect MY vacation and what kind of travel insurance should I buy?”

    If her dad is anything like my f-i-l or husband, he probably *didn’t* tell his daughter about his medical problems in any detail, preferring to downplay his condition.  In other words, Ms. Kamzik probably didn’t know what was going on with her dad until the cancer diagnosis was made. 

    My condolences to Ms. Kamzik.

  • Anonymous

    Jeanne,
    You’re right. I actually do remember the article that had the huge graphic  - a pie chart – about the reasons people buy travel insurance.
    However, I still believe people are confused, especially when it comes to buying for themselves.

    For example the OP thought she was covered, and then she was not. So she really wasted her money.

    Perhaps, if she could ask the forum ahead of time – what kind of insurance should I buy because … blah, blah, blah; then she could have gotten some or better advise.

    I think I made a mistake asking for a guide because as you said there are already guides out there. Maybe I should have just stuck to requesting for a place (forum) where folks can ask questions.

  • Anonymous

    There’s an endless discussion here of whether a stomach pain is a pre-existing medical condition. I wanna go back to what Bodega said – if she simply bought a policy with a waiver for pre-existing medical conditions, then she wouldn’t have wasted her money. End of story?

  • Anonymous

    Maybe Chris could add a tab to his site and place his guides there.  After they get “published” to an e-reader, that tab could be available to “Subscribers” for a nominal subscription – kind of like underwriters for his site.  Another tab could be for “AskElliott”, as you suggest.

    This thread is getting pretty skinny!  Wish Disqus didn’t do that.

  • Anonymous

    Why are they advertising and selling the policy without the waiver?  Why would anyone who truly understood it and wanted family member illness protection ever buy it?

  • Anonymous

    I appreciate the info from both of you, but I’m cynical.

    For example, say the relative – in this case an aunt who has lived with them for 30+ years and is marginally independent these days; a different BIL will come stay with her while my in-laws are out of town – suffers a severe stroke.  Which if you asked any doctor, would be life-threatening for a 90 year old.  My in-laws are the ones who manage her medical care, making sure she sees her doctors on schedule and takes the drugs prescribed for her.

    But I’m betting the insurance agency could easily argue that my husband’s aunt – who lives in the area – could act as caregiver.  Because she’s in the area and she’s family.  (They, however, have her sister, 88 years old and a recovered stroke victim in their home already.)  And if she survives the stroke, well, then it wasn’t “life-threatening” was it? *sarcasm alert*

    Like I said, being cynical.  Does anyone EVER get their money back from trip/travel insurance?

  • Anonymous

    Why would they sell it? Because they can.
    If you want to package a real cheap travel insurance policy that still pays a big commission to the seller, you’ll strip out all the goodies. Then you can sell it to unsuspecting clients online using a check-box opt-in system.
    Why would anyone buy it? Because they (buyers) don’t know any better. Knowledge ain’t cheap.

  • Anonymous

    I feel terrible for the OP and think the terms of the policy are horrible. Unfortunately, that doesn’t mean they’re not enforceable. By the time she started arguing that months of stomach pain were somehow unrelated to stomach cancer, I think she’d already lost. 

    To prove they were unrelated, the pains would need to have a definitive cause other than the cancer. If her doctors can prove that, then I think she should collect. However, I think she would have mentioned that if there was a definitive diagnosis of something else.

  • Anonymous

    Unfortunately, their legalese gives them outs in both directions. In your example, they likely would have denied the OP’s claim because a relative having an ulcer isn’t serious enough to warrant a cancellation. As this case played out, they denied the claim because medical assistance was sought and it turned out to be cancer. The only way she was going to collect was if her father had never went to the doctor.  Not agreeing with it, but that’s what the terms spell out.

  • Anonymous

    For TravelGuard, I believe you need to buy at least the SILVER plan to get the waiver as part of it (if you pay within 15 days of the initial trip payment). Otherwise, you need to buy the waiver as extra.

  • Anonymous

    She should contact the Better Business Bureau and file a complaint. 

Previous post:

Next post: