Do air travelers want a Bill of Rights? Apparently they don’t — or at least they shouldn’t — according to the Air Travelers Association, which this morning issued a press release saying that the proposed legislation is “feel good, but ironically will not do good for passengers.” The statement is impeccably timed. Later this week, key players in the bill battle will testify on Capitol Hill.
I probably would have shrugged the statement off as just another effort by the airline lobby to stop the legislation. Indeed, many of the points that the Air Travelers Association makes in its press release are identical to those made by the airline industry. The proposed bill, ATA argues, would increase cancellations, reduce safety and raise air fares.
Except that the ATA purports to represent air travelers. That’s right, it’s supposed to have our best interests in mind.
Which is a little odd, since a vast majority of air travelers I speak with say they want a bill.
All of this raises questions about who the ATA actually represents. I should say I’m not the first to wonder about this. Just a week ago, Conde Nast Portfolio’s new business travel columnist, Joe Brancatelli, observed on his site that ATA’s president had sent out a press release claiming that he was riding the Airbus A380 to “represent airline passengers.”
“Did I miss the election that chose him as our representative?” he wondered.
I note, as did Brancatelli, that ATA currently isn’t offering new memberships. Yet its Web site claims that it is member-supported.
What organization turns away new members — particularly when it relies on members for support?
In recent interviews, ATA has declined to talk about who actually pays the bills.
That’s a shame, because ATA could easily dispel some of its harshest criticism on the Web with a little more openness.
But a closer look at the Air Travelers Association Web site raises even more questions. It notes that its president, David Stempler, was previously the president of two regional airlines and a senior vice president of a jet charter company.
Does that sound like someone who would be sympathetic to the cause of air travelers — or of airlines?
If the Air Travelers Association claims to represent us, then I think it should be willing to answer a few simple questions.
Who are ATA’s current members? How is the organization funded? And when it takes a position such as the one it has on the Passengers Bill of Rights, who did it consult with before reaching that conclusion?
✓ Get the latest travel news, tips and commentary from Elliott’s E-Mail, the subversive newsletter from industry gadfly Christopher Elliott. You’ll travel like a pro. Sign up here. It’s free.
Sign up for my 
{ 2 comments… read them below or add one }
Mr Stempler is first and foremost an attorney and that alone tells us a great deal.
Visit his website and draw your own conclusions. Ask yourself:
Why if the organization purports to represent travelers is it not accepting members.
Why when you poke around the web site the only thing you find is Press Releases generated by guess who? If you said Mr. Stempler, you win a one week all expense paid trip to Camden NJ, Second prize is two weeks.
Only problem with the prize is you have to be a member and right now you can’t join.
Like I said visit his web site and decide for yourself. To me even Stevie Wonder could see right through his antics.
In addition to echoing the airline industry, Mr. Stempler completely rubber stamps any government recommendation concerning passenger information, no matter how intrusive the data collection might be. Have always wondered how the organization came into being and how he was selected to run it.