Travel blacklists: Turning tables on the industry


Maybe you’ve heard about Jason Puerner, or someone like him.

Puerner, a transportation planner from Lakewood, Colo., says he recently rented a Chevrolet Cruze with a pre-existing scratch from Enterprise. After returning the vehicle, he refused to cough up $412 for repairs and ended up on the company’s infamous “Do Not Rent” list.

“They also threatened collections or legal action if I don’t pay my bill,” he says.

Blacklists are common in the travel business. Airlines keep lists of passengers who are forbidden from flying, hotels have comparable do-not-stay lists, and most prominently, car rental companies have no-rent lists.

Here’s something you probably haven’t heard: Some industry organizations are starting to keep tabs on companies that misbehave. And they’re reporting them publicly. The results could help you have a better travel experience.

Puerner’s blacklisting was a mistake, as indeed some listings are. Who can forget the government report that found more than one-third of the names on the federal government’s terrorist watchlist are based on outdated information?

After I contacted Enterprise on his behalf, it rechecked its records. Sure enough, a previous renter’s records verified that the scratch was there before he rented the Chevy.

“We sincerely apologize for the confusion, inconvenience and misunderstanding,” an Enterprise representative told him.

When it comes to tracking the bad players, one of the most progressive trade groups is the American Society of Travel Agents (ASTA). For years, it kept a list of “logo violators” — companies that claimed to be ASTA members but weren’t.

The process behind the list is noteworthy.

“When a consumer sends us a question or complaint about a company, I always start by verifying its membership in ASTA,” explains Genevieve Strand, ASTA’s manager for government and industry affairs. “If it is using the ASTA logo and is in fact not a member, that initiates our logo violation process.”

Related story:   What really happens during a tourism disaster?

Typically, that begins with a strongly worded “cease and desist” letter to the agency warning that its unauthorized use of the logo misleads consumers. The logo violators aren’t just falsely claiming affiliation with ASTA; in some cases, they’re also ripping consumers off. I know because I’ve had complaints about a few of them from travelers.

For years, ASTA listed only a handful of companies and almost never spoke openly about the list. Now, under a new emphasis on helping consumers, it actively promotes its roster of rogue agents and its efforts to help travelers.

Some travel organizations are more discreet in outing bad operators, preferring to do it by exclusion. Consider the U.S. Tour Operators Association (USTOA) member list, available on its site. The USTOA requires each member to set aside $1 million of its own funds to protect consumers’ deposits and payments against losses arising from bankruptcy, insolvency or cessation of business of that member company.


I’ve talked with USTOA officials about their member list several times, and although they won’t say the non-members could be problematic, I will. If you’re considering a tour and don’t see a USTOA membership, I’d advise extra steps to protect yourself, such as a good travel insurance policy.

The more interesting question: Which industry organizations don’t name the bad players?

  • Airlines, represented by Airlines For America (A4A), don’t report the carriers that enrage customers with bogus fees and bad service. An A4A representative said reporting on underperforming airlines is best left to the government. (Oh, I know what you’re thinking — if they did, they’d all be on the list. But seriously, wouldn’t it help to name the worst of the worst?)
  • The car rental industry, represented by the American Car Rental Association (ACRA), doesn’t publish lists of ethically challenged car rental locations that ding their customers with bogus claims. An ACRA spokeswoman said that wouldn’t align with its mission to “promote, improve and enhance the motor vehicle rental industry.” Also, it would probably require a full-time staff of investigators working long hours, but it would be an incredible benefit to customers — and a boon to the industry’s credibility.
  • The cruise industry trade group, Cruise Lines International Association, doesn’t name potentially dubious cruise lines. Doing so might make travelers feel more comfortable taking a vacation at sea.
  • Hotels and their trade group, the American Hotel & Lodging Association, are mum when it comes to underperforming properties. Thankfully, we’ve got reader review sites such as TripAdvisor to get real-time report cards on individual lodgings.
Related story:   "We must act now to stop overhead baggage fees before they become commonplace"

For years, companies have tracked their worst customers. Wouldn’t it be nice if someone did the same for them? Although a few trade associations are, there’s a long way to go. When a business tells the truth about itself, everyone wins.

Other lists to watch:

  • Airline: The authoritative American Customer Satisfaction Index tracks airline customer service performance over the years and can offer a reliable indicator of the reputable, and disreputable, airlines.
  • Car rental: This is a difficult industry to track. The best-known list is J.D. Power’s customer service ranking, in its 21st year. Avoiding the low-scoring companies might be a sound travel strategy.
  • Cruise: You can get a pretty good idea which ships are unsanitary by reading the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s Vessel Sanitation Reports before booking your next cruise.

Christopher Elliott

Christopher Elliott is an author, journalist and consumer advocate. You can read more about him on his personal website or check out his adventures on his family adventure travel site. Contact him at chris@elliott.org.

  • SirWIred

    A note on Trip Insurance and Provider Default coverage. Many policies exclude the default of the organization through which you arranged the travel. For instance, if you pay a travel agency, and they are supposed to pass the money on, but don’t, you are not covered. If you book with a provider (such as a cruise line) directly, and they go under, again, not covered with some insurance policies. And no 1st-party policy provides default protection ever.

    The reasoning behind this makes sense; the insurance company does not want shady companies selling product they know they can’t provide and then using insurance polices as a “shield” against angry customers, AG investigations, etc.

    The “no coverage for direct booking” exclusions aren’t as common as they used to be, but the “middle-man” exclusions still are.

  • BubbaJoe123

    “When it comes to tracking the bad players, one of the most progressive trade groups is the American Society of Travel Agents (ASTA). For years, it kept a list of “logo violators” — companies that claimed to be ASTA members but weren’t.”

    ASTA charges fees to be a member. Not surprising that they want to go after agencies that claim to be members, but don’t pay the required fee.

    I’d be more interested in ASTA publishing lists of ASTA members who have behaved badly, or received complaints. I recall that they expelled a couple members a year or so ago, but given the thousands of members, there have to be more bad actors than that. Much like Elliott.org publishes a list of the complaints it gets by company, ASTA should publish a list of the complaints it gets by member agency.

  • Steve Rabin

    Trade groups have really one purpose in mind: to protect their members. Yes, weeding out bad actors would be nice and to the benefit of the members, but they don’t want to anger their members either. So policing them really isn’t in their DNA. (And the comment to leave it to the government–well you can pretty much forget that right now)

  • LeeAnneClark

    “After I contacted Enterprise on his behalf, it rechecked its records. Sure enough, a previous renter’s records verified that the scratch was there before he rented the Chevy. “We sincerely apologize for the confusion, inconvenience and misunderstanding,’ an Enterprise representative told him.”

    Yeah, sure, uh huh. If anyone believes that was an ‘honest’ mistake on Enterprise’s part, I’ve got some hurricane-soaked land in Florida to sell you. Note that it took Christopher’s involvement before they fessed up that the scratch was already there. Obviously they had records showing that to be the case, but the poor customer himself wasn’t able to get them to admit the truth…they even went so far as to threaten him with legal action, and blacklisted him. It wasn’t until Christopher “Corleone” Elliott stepped in that they were forced to back off.

    This was just yer run-of-the-mill fake damage claim scam. They all do it. Car rental companies have turned scratches into repeat profit centers.

  • jdsonice

    The problem is simple. There are no consequences for bad actions. In the case of Puerner, Enterprise said they were “sorry” and moved on. They did not pay a fine, got prosecuted or anything. It is time for the government to step in and go after the bad actors. Of course it will never happen because of political donations the travel industry gives to the political establishment.

  • The Original Joe S

    I like wet lands! Good for watermelons and cranberries!

    Photograph every inch of the car, before and after. THEN make a video. Sides, hood, trunk, TOP, Underneath, Inside. Mileage on speedometer. Snap a shot of the guy who gives you the car. DATE STAMP OPTION TURNED ON FOR IMBED IN THE PHOTOS; don’t just rely on the metadata.

    When Enterprise [ or any other dirtbag ] tries the scam, reply politely with a letter telling them that you are innocent, and have proof. If they ignore you and/or threaten legal action, send a 2nd letter, copy to attorney general, and govt regulators, and Don Elliott, telling them to get ready to watch the games begin. If they turn it over to a dirtbag collection agency, inform them that they will also be on the lawsuit list .Next, if they still are obdurate, file complaints with govt, Attorney General, and Include a draft of the court paperwork you intend to file. $35 is cheap for entertainment. . It’s to be hoped that you live in a Commonwealth from which you ordered the rental, and that Commonwealth makes the vendor subject to its judicial system. Let ’em ignore you again, and lose by default. THEN wait 30 days, and impound their property.

    I like being retired. It leaves me plenty of time to hassle dirtbags who need hassles…..

  • The Original Joe S

    We have the best legislatures and legal systems that money can buy!

Get smart. Sign up for the newsletter.