The Transportation Security Administration today lifted its total ban on gels and liquids carried on planes, replacing an arbitrary prohibition on almost all things fluid (including sandwich condiments) with one that is about as clear as a bottle of hair gel.
Travelers will be allowed to carry toiletries of three ounces or less that fit comfortably in one quart-size, clear plastic, zip-top bag through security checkpoints. Passengers may also bring items, including beverages, purchased in the secure boarding area on-board the aircraft.
Show of hands, please, from anyone who understands this new rule. Yeah, neither do I.
If the TSA is saying what I think it might be saying, and if I were a terrorist, here’s what I’d do: First, I’d pack all of my liquid explosives into a travel-size tube. Then I’d make sure that my accomplices got a job at Starbucks, where they’d whip up one really mean latte for me.
Then I’d board the next transatlantic flight and … well, you can probably guess the rest.
Can’t happen, says the TSA. And I quote Kip Hawley, the agency’s assistant secretary: “After the initial, total ban, we have learned enough from the UK investigation to say with confidence that small, travel size liquids are safe to bring through security checkpoints in limited numbers. We have also taken additional security measures throughout the airport that make us comfortable allowing passengers to bring beverages and other items purchased in the secure area onboard.”
I want to believe the government. But when security is so porous that a man can fly with his two-year-old daughter’s passport, and when mysterious luggage can make a flight without a passenger, I really have to wonder.
My concerns are shared by other bloggers, who correctly point out that the TSA’s latest ruling raises more questions than it answers.
The TSA needs to take a hard look at its prohibition on gels and liquids and do what it should have done weeks ago: Lift its ban on carry-on fluids. Completely.
The terrorists will surely come up with another way of bringing down a plane that doesn’t involve combustible sports drinks.
Hmmm. Perhaps the TSA issued the wrong press release?
✓ Get the latest travel news, tips and commentary from Elliott’s E-Mail, the subversive newsletter from industry gadfly Christopher Elliott. You’ll travel like a pro. Sign up here. It’s free.
Sign up for my 
{ 3 comments… read them below or add one }
I disagree. I think a well balanced approach to liquids is needed. If we were to remove the ban on liquids, then the terrorists, or copycat wannabees, will have an obvious opening.
The nature of an emergency is to first overreact then scale back towards normalcy. This is what we are seeing now.
First order of business for potential terrorists: get a job with the TSA. Just think what you could put INTO
luggage while you’re taking other things out.
Easiest way to take down an aircraft.
Park on a public road near the end of the runway and aim some lightweight rockets into the wing as it takes off, same as the Mudjahadeen did to the Russians at Kabul airport when the Russians invaded Afghanistan.
No TSA checkpoint involved…
Until someone secures the ground around the airport for at least a 5km radius then this could happen.