What's the book corporate America doesn't want you to read? Find out now -- or you could get scammed.

New TripAdvisor whistleblower claims: some reviews are “totally fraudulent”

June 23, 2009

In the wake of the recent TripAdvisor rating scandal, two travel industry insiders are claiming reviews about their businesses have been faked, either by competitors or by themselves.

John Walker, who runs the Hotel Los Castaños — described as an intimate hotel of quality in Cartajima, a small village near Ronda, Spain, “with rooms ranging from stylishly economic to purely luxurious” — says rivals planted a bad review of his property.

They managed to get a number of reviews removed from our listing and posted a totally fraudulent review which has ruined our ratings. TripAdvisor seems to be refusing to remove it, despite what you quote April Robb as saying, that suspect reviews are immediately taken down. This shows that their site is open to abuse from not just owners but also of general users and competitors, which makes life more difficult in these very difficult times.

Walker is referring to the following review, posted by a contributor named Dwronda.

Reality check. The Los Castanos Hotel is 18 kilometers, 25+ minutes* from Ronda. Calling ‘Cartajima’ ‘Ronda’ is like calling the city of ‘Oakland,’ ‘San Francisco’. Last year, it took my family about about 30 minutes up and down some narrow mountain roads to travel from Ronda to Cartajima. There are some fine local artisans in Cartajima who weave cloth and rugs, so Cartajima is definitely worth a visit. But there are few restaurants or hikes around Cartajima. Los Castanos is a comfortable rural hotel, a two-star property by most standards. Simple rooms, no pool, lacks a full-service restaurant.

Walker responded to the complaint on TripAdvisor:

Los Castanos is not in central Ronda as one can see from the Tripadvisor map, but Ronda is our nearest town. We are located in a tiny village about 14 minutes drive down a major highway and 6 minutes along a fairly narrow well-paved mountain road. Our guests come to us because they want to be in the Ronda area but not in the town.

Unfortunately, Cartajima does not boast any artisans or weavers.

We have a small, spectacularly located pool on our rooftop terrace (see photo at the top of this page) and we have a restaurant for our guests only (see other reviews).

A recent Daily Telegraph reporter described the hiking in this quiet valley as ‘the best I have ever done’, and we have a contract with a walking company for week-long walking holidays.

Regarding the amenities in the hotel, I would advise readers to look at the other reviews.

Did this review “ruin” the Los Castanos’ rating? Hardly. A vast majority of its guests rated it as “excellent.”

All of which brings me to the next complaint from William, a former restaurateur who told me about how he leveraged TripAdvisor to increase his business.

I just wanted to give you my input on my experience as a business owner who artificially “upped” my own rating.

I live in Costa Rica and used to own a very popular restaurant in a resort town on the pacific coast. My restaurant was a huge success, and for the most part my advertising was word of mouth. Any time you get a group of gringos together, they WILL compare notes on the must do’s and must don’ts. We quickly became a must-do.

I began tracking feedback about my restaurant on TripAdvisors “rants and raves” page. It very quickly occurred to me that I could right in glowing reviews about my own restaurant and up my ratings numbers. Luckily, that wasn’t necessary at first. We had some great reviews from actual real life clients and we maintained a 4 to 4.5 rating.

After a period of time, I began to see my rating slide a bit after some not so positive postings by supposedly “real” customers. The complaints that were written about seemed somewhat contrived, and as I was owner and general manager I would have become aware very quickly about these types of complaints.

Were they posted by my competition?

Perhaps, but I didn’t let it concern me too much. I simply got on TripAdvisor and bombarded them with glowing reviews about my own restaurant! Within days, I was rated a perfect 5!

During that same time my competitors ratings mysteriously declined, and the negative reviews for their restaurants came from all over the US — including Debby from Dallas! No joke.

I still use TripAdvisor for my travels around the globe, but I always throw out the high and the low score and rely on what lies in the middle. Usually the truth.

These claims are disturbing, to say the least. But in talking with TripAdvisor, which admits it is unable to catch every fraudulent review, it seems this may expose an active community of travel insiders who successfully doctor some of the site’s reviews.

There has to be a better way to get authentic reviews about hotels and restaurants.

Christopher Elliott is the author of Scammed: How to Save Your Money and Find Better Service in a World of Schemes, Swindles, and Shady Deals. Critics have called it “eye-opening” and “inspiring” — it’ll “grab your attention and won’t let go.” Order your copy now on Amazon, Barnes & Noble or iTunes.

37 comments

  • Phil

    I agree that there should be away to receive more authentic reviews, but then you could say this about any web site that reviews anything, products, or services, I am sure that TA is not the only web site where fraudulent reviews are posted. Again, when I use TA I then match their reviews with reviews from other web sites to get a better idea of the hotel, restaurant I am reading about.

  • Jasper

    Sigh. web2.0 applications like Tripadvisor are filled with user-generated content. And everybody should realize that those users are not only nice well-educated folks who write reasonable pieces. Real users can be anybody, including fringe lunatics.

    As long as you use common sense and do not rely on individual comments, but on the whole of all comments, you will be fine.

    If you see confusion about location, then there are plenty of mapping sites where you can check your data. Ignore the raves and rants. Then look at what’s left in the middle.

    Here’s the problem. People who criticize web2.0 websites, such as Tripadvisor, and Wikipedia, often silently assume that the printed information on the subjects is flawless and perfect. It is not. Many travel writers get free stays. Restaurant critics get free meals. Encyclopedia writers have a certain expertise angle on subjects, but not necessarily a complete view of the subject.

    In short. No source of information is perfect. Print stuff has a certain authority, because they make you pay for their info, so it must be good, right? Not always. Web2.0 is free, however, it does allow many more people to participate in the process. So the question is who you trust more. An fairly anonymous and redacted print writer, that you know nothing about, but who has been vetted and paid for his review. Or hundreds of writers that all have given their honest opinion, without any filter, and without any payment.

  • Jay

    “have delivered a devastating blow to the Expedia-owned site.”:
    “recent TripAdvisor rating scandal, ”

    And what does this amount too? 92 reviews with warnings! To say this is so much hyperbole would be an understatement.

    Sorry Chris, but I don’t see 92 suspect reviews a “devasting blow” or “scandal” Let me know when you have a REAL story!.

    As a regular user of Trip Advisor (bpdogs), I have yet to have a bad experience. I’ve had some disappointments, but those were at hotels that had a mixed bag of reviews.

  • Joe R

    So we have two accounts here: one proudly boasting he’s basically cheating and lying to improve his rating rather than actually *doing* something to improve his customers’ experiences, and another whose point seems to be that anyone with a negative review should be able to simply ask TA to remove it because it’s fraudulent.

    Professional writers should have integrity and training on how to report things in an honest and factual way. It’s why you *buy* a book with reviews that you should be able to trust.

    Anything written by common folk is suspect. It’s a combination of opinions, ignorance, and manipulation. The vast majority of reviews on TA are probably honest accounts of what happened or what the person thinks of a property. But of course there are dishonest people. Not everyone will report will report their stay accurately or honestly.

    What can TA do? It can go the eBay route and just not allow any negative feedback to be left. It can start charging for access to the site so they can pay people to investigate every one of the reviews. Or they can do what they’re doing, and just let people know it’s not a perfect system.

    Think for yourselves, people. Don’t any of these folk get tired of letting other people decide things for them?

  • Carver

    I think the real problem that some have with TA is that they cannot control the content. Like Jasper said, the print publications are not exactly unbiaed. Hoteliers routinely give freebies to industry folks for the purpose of “education”. One reviewer friend of mine turned down over 3k worth of amenities at a posh hotel as he was reviewing that property.

  • Jay

    PLUS, since I have the time I checked out dwronda’s profile on Trip Advisor. He seems like a legitimate local who is a bit of an opinionated blowhard. Though he has written a lot in a fairly short time.

    In regards to the comment “Cartajima does not boast any artisans or weavers” that the hotel owner made, I found this rug seller website from the area talked about:

    http://www.andalucianrugs.com/Contact%20us.html

    and this:

    “26 April 2009 – Artisans market …..just outside Ronda, situated in the lovely courtyard of the Hotel/Restaurant Molino del Puente, ” which is in, Cartajima!

    AND in regards to that “spectacularly located pool on our rooftop terrace”, looking at the photo, it looks more like an over sized jacuzzi. Some of the positive reviews actually seem more suspect , like ““The best Hotel ever!” and “experience not to be missed!””

    So, what I think we have here is just a local who thinks the place is overrated and a hotel owner with hurt feelings C’mon Chris, you’re trying to create a story where there is none. Stop beating up Trip Advisor!!

  • http://gaylesbianretiring.org Veronica St Claire

    My partner and I have used TripAdvisor for dozens of recommendations and have always posted there as well. We posted an inaccurate account of a hotel (same name, same town but different owners). It was a glowing report but “our” hotel pointed out that we were in error with the duplicate name. I contacted TripAdvisor and they changed the address and particulars immediately. Now the cute, adorable, owner-involved hotel is listed and not the class C hotel with the same name.

    We have had a lot of use from this website and feel that the seasoned traveler can, for the most part, pick out the made up items.

  • Brian

    I don’t think Dwronda’s review looks at all strange. I grew up in the San Francisco Bay Area and that review seem completely realistic to me.

    If a rival hotel was posting reviews I doubt the english would be as good and the reference to a US city is pretty obscure.

    I think the hotel just wants the negative review off the site and doesn’t want travelers to realize how far their hotel is from the city center.

    I agree with the other poster that the positive reviews seem suspect and we have a hotel owner who is mad because they couldn’t game the system.

  • Allison

    I echo the comments about TA never being a perfect system and I think that is OK for my purposes. I stumbled upon TA about 5 years ago while researching a trip to New Zealand and booked a boutique hotel in Queenstown based on the TA reviews. I found the positive reviews very close to my own experience and then started posting hotel reviews of most hotel properties I’ve stayed at over the last several years. I generally use TA as a guidepost to avoid a clear “stinker” of a property but feel that I can generally get an honest picture of the hotel from the vast majority of reviews. My own reviews tend to be rather nuanced–I rarely announce a “best ever” or “worst ever” and I try to tailor my expectations to the type of property (three star vs 5 star, for example).

    So what’s so frustrating for me about TA? Three times I’ve had reviews rejected by the site for downright odd reasons.

    The first time involved a stay at a Four Seasons. I commented that this particular property did not appear to live up to the standards of other Four Seasons I have stayed at, or the property I had a summer job (while in college) at over 15 years ago (different Four Seasons, different city). Yes, a summer job while in college over a decade ago now bans me from commenting on any Four Seasons hotel. Even though my review was neither a shill nor a torpedo.

    Second review involved a Homewood Suites property in which I disagreed with a prior reviewer about the location of the property. Bottom line, this reviewer was completely wrong about the location (a quick Google search could confirm this for anyone) and my attempt to correct this clear error was rejected as being “hostile” to another reviewer. I responded to the rejection with a bit of incredulouty, especially since there are a lot of truly down right mean and hostile reviews on the sight. TA eventually posted my review as originally written.

    My third rejection was the most bizarre. I wrote about a Hampton Inn in a small town. I had several odd occurrences at the property, including electrical problems, no satellite tv, things being moved around in my room, including all of my toiletries being dumped in the sink while I was out for the day. I happened to meet someone at a local restaurant who used to work at the property. When I told him about my odd stay, he joked that the “word” at the property was that the place was haunted. My review, which noted the odd occurrences and my “haunted” conversation was initially accepted by TA and remained on the site for many months before being suddenly pulled. I received an email saying my review did not conform to TA’s rules. Not sure if TA is afraid of ghosts, or of guests speaking to randomly encountered former employees or what.

    Bottom line, to have these types of reviews pulled means someone is reading reviews pretty closely and thinking long and hard about them. So why can’t they pull the obvious shills or bad apples?

  • Noah

    I’ve never seen somebody speak with so much pride about committing fraud as William the former restaurant owner does in this post.

  • John Walker

    OK so dwronda is a legitimate local but his review is far from it. He/she/they have never been here, either as a visitor or a guest. His description of our hotel beggars belief as anyone of the reviews on our listing should tell you.

    Recent visitors have said that they are sceptical about such good reviews but in this instance..

    And as for Andalusin Rugs. They are woven in Andalucia but not in Cartajima as dwronda claims to have seen

    If you look at their website it says this in so many words and look at the pictures on the home page. Two of them are of Los Castanos!!

    And by the way ‘I grew up in San Francisco’, no Brit would use American language or examples and the Hotel Molino del Puente is the other side of Ronda not in Cartajima.

    Oh and we have already responded to the location and we don’t claim to be ‘in Ronda’. Please be good enough to look at our website too!

  • Pingback: On TripAdvisor, Oyster and Professional Hotel Reviews: My Totally Reasonable Solution « Travel

  • Jay

    Mr. Walker,

    Move on with your life. A local didn’t like you. It happens.

    In regards to “the Hotel Molino del Puente is the other side of Ronda not in Cartajima”, the website said it was, So my bad.

    “And by the way ‘I grew up in San Francisco’, no Brit would use American language or examples” WHO the heck is claiming they are British??

  • Paulette

    Scandal? What scandal? Chris, you’re way over the top here! So some of the TA postings are fraudulent. You look at an array of postings, ignoring the gushing or damning, and figure things out from there.

    Everything I’ve ever posted on TA has been listed accurately, but I know that someone with a personal beef can skew things to the negative. I barely recognized a hotel I visit annually from a couple of horrible reviews. In fact, some of what these reviewers wrote were outright lies, as the accommodations / facilities they described don’t even exist at that particular hotel. When I took a closer look, I noticed very similar language in the two reviews. They were from two women who live in the same town — coincidence? I think not. They were traveling together and something didn’t go right during their visit — who knows what ; even the best-run establishments has off days — but rather than one or the other writing a review, they wrote two to do double damage. Instead of writing an honest review of their unsatisfactory experience, their intention was to punish the hotel by discouraging potential visitors.

    So, yes, you need to take any review on TA with a grain of salt; compare with other sites/sources, and make an informed decision.

  • Jay

    BTW Mr. Walker, how do you know he’s never been to your hotel??!!

  • John Walker

    Hi Jay, because we rarely have families and certainly didn’t when he claims to have been here. With 6 rooms you get to know all guests pretty well and if someone was this disatisfied we would certainly have known about it.

    If ,as he claims, dw has been to 103 destinations how come has has never reviewed anywhere other than Ronda and Jerez?

    If dw is real perhaps he would like to say who he is!?

    On the positive side dw thanks for the raising of Cartajima’s profile!

    JW

  • Al B

    I just spent an hour on the new Oyster.com site, and I must say it has lots of potential. Their reviews are written by hired reporters and I found a pretty good balance of positive and negative in what I saw.

    They offer lots of photos and good navigation.

    They name their reporters on the site and provide headshots, which could prove problematic once hoteliers recognize them. Until then, it will be my go-to guide for Miami and the Caribbean (they say New York and Las Vegas will be posted in July).

  • http://www.hoteldesigns.net Patrick Goff

    We provide HotelReviews looking at the relationship between the design and operational criteria of hotels on our website, lavishly illustrated with photographs and some video. For Reviews we stay in the hotel for two nights to both experience and photograph. For Miniviews we photograph without staying spending half a day walking around the hotel taking our own photographs. We serve the design industry and take no money from hotels. We are only interested in efficient design and how design relates to brand and star ratings. We add about 4 Reviews or Miniviews a month to the site covering the US, Europe,Africa and Asia. Access is free. We have 126 hotels – 98 full Reviews and the rest Miniviews, both of which use around 25 images of the interiors.

    We used to be linked to by Tripadvisor but they changed their policies and stopped linking to external sites last July since when our reader numbers and pages read have grown considerably…

  • dwronda

    I won’t address the fake outrage. But I believe my review was 100-percent accurate. I flagged bad location information on Trip Advisor. Never criticized his hotel. The operator listed a “Cartajima Ronda, Malaga” address. In reality, Cartajima and Ronda are separate towns, 18K and 30 minutes apart. Did inn keeper game the system? I won’t go there. But to me, TripAdvisor made the right call, correcting his address and reclassifying his property. The former Ronda hotel is now a Cartajima B&B.

  • The Good Doctor

    As a TA user, reviewer, and Destination Expert, I’ve learned to take reviews with a grain of salt. It’s an open website, for crying out loud, not the Michelin Guide or a scientific study.

    Reviews that are too glowing are disregarded, as are reviews that are extremely critical (anybody can have a bad day). Reviewers with a proven history of reviews or those who post their actual photos of the place get a lot more credibility in my book.

    Do your own homework and don’t believe everything you read on TripAdvisor – the site is only as reliable and responsible as its users.

  • Jim

    TA is TA. I find most of the reviews say more about the reviewer and their expectations than it does about what they’re reviewing. It’s just one tool, of many, to help make travel decisions.

  • Pingback: Follow me Friday « SixSuitcaseTravel

  • Dan

    The hotel in question only has totally fawning reviews on TripAdvisor – and an overall score of 4 1/2 stars:

    http://www.tripadvisor.com/Hotel_Review-g1462719-d534998-Reviews-Los_Castanos-Cartajima_Costa_del_Sol_Andalusia.html

    What is this guy whining about? Do you guys check before you give these people a soapbox?

  • Sandy

    Has anybody else noticed these anoymous and shadowy ‘ Tripadvisor Contributor’. Check out the review of Les Marissons restaurant in Amiens , France as an example of one of these. The first ever reviewer, this generic ‘TripAdvisor Contributor’ gives the restaurant 5 stars and calls it the best restaurant in Amiens.

    What on earth is “A TripAdvisor Contributor”. The mouse hover over explains it is a trusted member of the community. Trusted by who??? What criteria are they using to measure and allocate trust?

    I think there is a story there. I really don’t think it is appropriate for an impartial review website to allow some users to be completely anonymous like this and also to then go on to suggest they are in some way more trustworthy than others.

    In case you were wondering, I know Amiens and the restaurant and I would be surprised to hear someone say it was the best restaurant in Amiens.

  • Bijay J Anand

    There is another issue here. What if TripAdvisor itself manipulating ratings to benefit certain Hotels? What if it has a vested interest in the success or failure of certain properties? What has happened to me certainly points to that direction.
    My wife & I are avid travelers. We like to consider ourselves retired though I’m 39 & she’s 30 because our love for travel is so great that it is all that we want to do for the rest of our lives.
    One of the most important tools that aid us in our journeys is (was) Tripadvisor.com. It did happen a couple of times that we read rave reviews about certain hotels & decided to stay there only to find the place terrible. Whatever might have been the case I, being a loyal tripadvisor follower felt it my duty & obligation to post my own reviews to help my fellow travelers in their choice of hotels.
    We stayed at one such highly recommended hotel in Rome called Welrome based on the amazing tripadvisor reviews & recommendations. When we actually checked in this property was so terrible that there are no words that I can use that would be strong enough to elucidate our horror. We promptly checked out & moved in to a better & cheaper property across the road.
    Upon returning home I felt duly obliged to post our review on this terrible hotel on tripadvisor so as to warn other unsuspecting travelers about this hellhole. I received the confirmation of my damning review having been posted by tripadvisor.com.
    When we had a similar experience at Tongsai Bay in Koh Samui (Thailand) last week where I found the reviews much more glorifying of a non-deserving hotel I had a niggling and worrying doubt, was tripadvisor manipulating reviews to suit their interests? It was out of this curiosity that I accessed the reviews of Welrome Hotel & to my horror I found that my review had been deleted. Why?
    I could understand if certain cronies of Welrome had posted fake reviews to unjustifiably glorify this sad & disgusting property. What baffles me is that why would tripadvisor delete a genuine review from a regular patron of their website like myself.
    This episode has shattered my faith in Tripadvisor & I would like to share my increased suspicion with everyone that reviews on Tripadvisor might need to be taken with a sackful of salt.

  • Hotel Employee

    As an employee of the travel industry, I’ve seen my share of reviews on TA. One, in particular, I know for certain was faked as I was working that afternoon when the “guest” claims to have come to the front desk to complain. My property isn’t concerned with this review as we know that it would be darn near impossible to have it removed.

    The one that we do want removed isn’t even wrong in what happened. I remember the guest in question and her problem was legitimate. Now, before anyone gets upset, our hotel has no problems with people voicing their opinion. We don’t even want the entire thing removed. The part that we have problems with is the very end. The review contains a racial slur and states that everyone should save their money instead of handing it to a towelheaded foreigner.

    We believe that that is over the top and just plain rude. Furthermore, the owner of the hotel was not only born in America but has never even left this country!

    However, when I contacted TA to have this one line removed they cited that nothing would be done about it because it expressed the views of the writer. They went on to say that just because our property received a negative review and we didn’t like it didn’t mean that we had the right to have it removed. I emailed them back stating that we didn’t want the review removed, only the one line containing the slur. They ignored all further emails.

  • Chrissie

    Our small inn was just slandered on TripAdvisor. They allow anyone to write anything about all hotels and inns. It is obviously a competitor or just plain malicious. All of our 78 guests have loved our inn. Our rooms are not small as they claimed. They are all well over 500 square feet. Does anyone know how to get these fraudulent reviews removed? TripAdvisor is doing nothing for the hotel community with this type of review. They need to screen more closely. Our fraudulent review states they are from Minnesota and stayed in November of 09. We only had 5 guests in Nov of 09 and they were all from IL and one from WI. We have all of the Nov 09′s written reviews and they all loved our inn. The tripadvisor fraudulent postings have got to stop!

  • Pingback: TRIPADVISOR Travelers’ Choice 2010 | buzzhype

  • Jose Tropicana

    Its time Tripadvisor gets a really nice class action lawsuit – they enable people to defame and libel businesses – and there is no verification – especially when you see the difference between reviews – some wonderful, some awful – who do you believe? Who is the lier? Tripadvisor also does not give the business owner the same right and freedom to respond as they do the “revierwer.” They will loose big time in a court of law. I’m working on it at this end.

  • Pingback: » Just how useful are service reviews? Yet Another Skeptic's Blog

  • marty

    I have done some investigation here about Tripadvisor. I have worked with hotels for many years and this is what I can say for sure.
    Hotel owners, mostly independant hotels, have lost control of their industry. Third parties have taken over while having little or no investment. These third parties, i.e. Tripadvisor, Hotels.com, Expedia and Hotwire, all of which are owned by Barry Diller have turned the independant owner into a pawn by having the ability to manipulate the reveiws in such a way that they can actually redirect customers without them even knowing it.
    How so? O.K. Go to Tripadvisor pick a city and see what you find. A list of hotels in a rating system from one to whatever number. If we believe the reveiws some might have 15 reviews and are rated # 1, 2 or 3 (often these hotels have only recently signed up with these third paties). Then one will have 100 reviews and be rated somewhere in the so so area. Yet the 100 reveiws have 75 very good ratings. The highest rated one could very well be an old hotel under new management and it might have been a dump in its previous listing life. The new hotel owner swiftly loads his fake reviews by having his family and associates post fake 5 star reveiws. Tripadvisor can not stop these fakes if they are loaded in by differant computors with differant i.p. addresses. Think Kinko’s, UPS stores, etc. or even Office Depot while appearing to be looking to purchasing a new laptop.

    This also applies to the other side of the picture. Someone loads bad reviews of their competitor. Or a crazy customer that did not get a discount and just creates new email accounts and looks like 30 differant people. This all happens on Tripadvisor every day. Because they do not require proof of you even having stayed at the hotel.

    Now lets look at how Tripadvisor makes money. They make a % of every unit booked on Hotels.com, Expedia, Hotwire or an affiliate. No you say tripadvisor does not get a commission. Well kind of? They get a pay per click fee from most of their links. So the more they keep you going in circles the better. More clicks.
    However Expedia, Hotwire and Hotels.com are owned by the same person that owns Tripadvisor. 25-35% of the hotel rate is what they get. Some hotels have contracts that are better for Expedia, etc. so you are now very cleverly directed to these hotels. How? By manipulating the reveiws that is how. They remove negative reveiws or hold back positive ones. Do they write them? No, they just manuver them. Which is the same thing in my book.
    Also, most of the time there is no discount at all. You just think you got one. Just check the room rate or call the hotel before booking and you will see that.

    Now in the beginning these third parties were great for independant hotels because it got them in with the big boys on the web. Where can a small independant advertize. They could not take ads in every city in the world. So that was good in the start. However, when Barry Diller saw the manipulation that was possible he began to purchase these companies and here we sit today all arguing with one another while he rakes in the cash.
    The last thing that no one gets is this. Third parties have raised the price of rooms over the years. Hoteliers have adjusted prices to include their third party’s commissions. Just a fact of doing business. As usual the angels become the devil and that what third party bookers have become.
    Always call the hotel before booking. Because third party bookings get the worst rooms in a hotel because your booking is classified as a bargain hunter. If you book direct you get treated better and you have a direct relationship with the hotel not some third party that holds the hotel, less commision, funds for up to 30 days or more. Many times if there is a problem the hotel will tell Expedia to refund a guest payment. In that event what sometimes happens is the guest is told that the hotel would not refund the money. Then the hotel does not get the funds and Expedia keeps it all.
    No you say! They would not do that! Well let me show you how far they will go. Lets say you book a $100.00 + tax and the Hotel is paid $70.00 + tax. Where do you think the tax on $30.00 goes. Nowhere, Expedia keeps it. Now if a company will cheat every city in the world out of sales taxes what do you think they will do to you. “BARRY DILLER” you are a piece of work!

  • Marty

    also my spell check sucks! Barry did you do that as well?

  • Pingback: Camelot Castle Hotel Tintagel and Scientologists John & Irina Mappin and Ted Stourton - Page 13 - Why We Protest | Activism Forum

  • imominous

    When you look at a series of reviews on TripAdvisor, the ones with the greatest disparity between satisfied and disgruntled raises a red flag.

    For example, have a look at reviews for Camelot Castle Hotel in Cornwall.
    Reviews are either hyperbolic and written by someone who really, really likes the word ‘magical,’ and people who had a miserable time being hounded by their hosts to purchase bad paintings and admire the “creativity” of owners John Mappin and Ted Stourton, the perpetrator of the aforementioned paintings.

    Reports of mold, leaks, holes in walls, fiberglass pod bathrooms, drafts and inadequate blankets are common.

    From the sound of it, these two hoteliers are more concerned with self promotion and spreading the word of L. Ron Hubbard (did I mention they’re Scientologists?) than catering to their customers’ needs.

    In fact, this would be a heck of a story on its own. Camelot Castle Hotel is weird with a beard. Her name is Irina.

  • James Tough

    Is there a way you can force Trip Advisor to remove your hotel from its website?
    I am so sick of the lies on Trip Advisor I would rather not be on it at all.

  • http://www.troisj.com Jay
  • Andyrduggins

    i have just experienced the same thing with tripadvisor, we had some customers at my resort ,not actually staying there , and they where purchasing drinks at the beach bar and adding them to our own actual customers room bills, this was spotted very quickly by our staff and they where asked to leave the premises,they didnt so they had to be escorted off the premises, and now there is a vendetta against the resort with the 2 men in question asking all there friends to write a review as if they have been customers and now our ratings are sliding, trip advisors answer ? write a management response,they make sure we hoteliers stick to the rules and we do but when any other tom dick or harry wants to write slanderous rubbish they dont want to know …….TRIP ADVISOR……………..sort it out 

Previous post:

Next post: